Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Iguana Bird (fictional creature)

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. SarahStierch (talk) 17:23, 24 October 2012 (UTC)

=[[Iguana Bird (fictional creature)]]=

: also nominating: Iguana Bird (disambiguation)

:{{la|Iguana Bird (fictional creature)}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Iguana_Bird_(fictional_creature) Stats])

:({{Find sources|Iguana Bird (fictional creature)}})

Non-notable alleged internet meme, unsourced, probable hoax. Nothing on Google; alleged indicator of notability (something about "google trend") seems bogus. Fut.Perf. ☼ 22:46, 17 October 2012 (UTC)

Delete Iguana Bird (fictional creature). I can't find any evidence that this is a notable meme. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 03:22, 18 October 2012 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:16, 19 October 2012 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:16, 19 October 2012 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:16, 19 October 2012 (UTC)

Delete Iguana Bird (fictional creature) as non-notable. Speedy Delete Iguana Bird (disambiguation) as G6. Except for this AfD, {{tl|db-disambig}} would have been appropriate for it. -- JHunterJ (talk) 12:56, 20 October 2012 (UTC)
Delete. Obscure meme with no coverage by reliable sources. A [http://www.google.com/search?q=%22Iguana+Bird%22&hl=en&gl=us&tbm=nws&source=lnt&tbs=ar:1&sa=X&ei=8FCHUNbNMM-v0AGNxIGgAw&ved=0CBcQpwUoBQ search] for news articles doesn't bring up anything. Fails to meet the general notability guideline.--xanchester (t) 02:24, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
Delete. Not a lick of coverage could be found in a search. It may have been a meme, but it didn't attract significant coverage in reliable sources and hence fails WP:GNG. --Batard0 (talk) 17:10, 24 October 2012 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.