Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joyce Mack

{{AFD help}}

:{{la|1=Joyce Mack}} – (View AfDView log | edits since nomination)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=Joyce Mack}})

AI generated article, with only one source (an obituary). Could not find any other sources that aren't obituaries. LR.127 (talk) 16:14, 11 June 2025 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women, California, and Nevada. LR.127 (talk) 16:14, 11 June 2025 (UTC)
• Delete - I've seen 5 AI-generated article related AFDS in the past month alone. Prior to that, I had not seen one. Honestly kind of scary if you ask me. ロドリゲス恭子 (talk) 03:50, 12 June 2025 (UTC)
• Delete per WP:NOTMEMORIAL. Without any other sources this is just a rephrasing of an obituary. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 22:25, 11 June 2025 (UTC)
• Delete per WP:TNT. ChatGPT makes terrible articles. I only use AI for spell-checking. Bearian (talk) 17:17, 12 June 2025 (UTC)
• :Shouldn't AI be avoided at all costs? If we keep using AI, WP's credibility would sink like a battleship, as if there werent enough credibility problems. ロドリゲス恭子 (talk) 18:40, 12 June 2025 (UTC)
• Delete, purge AI with extreme prejudice, and no compelling reason to "start over" cf. WP:TNT. Geschichte (talk) 12:20, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
• Delete No notability and only one source. But how can you be sure it's AI-generated? (Honest question - couldn't it just be badly written?) Lijil (talk) 20:23, 17 June 2025 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.