Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kea Wong

:{{la|Kea Wong}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Kea_Wong Stats])

:({{Find sources|Kea Wong}})

Her most notable role according to the article is a cameo, barely noticeable. JDDJS (talk) 03:53, 17 May 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:42, 17 May 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:42, 17 May 2014 (UTC)

---

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar ♔ 17:13, 24 May 2014 (UTC)

---

• Delete Subject appears to fail WP:NACTOR. A Google did not yield anything that rings the notability bell. -Ad Orientem (talk) 00:33, 26 May 2014 (UTC)

---

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, j⚛e decker^talk 00:44, 1 June 2014 (UTC)

---

• Keep Her IMDB profile appears to list enough roles to meet the notability threshold for an actress. Rreagan007 (talk) 18:35, 1 June 2014 (UTC)

:*Two quick points... First IMDB is not considered a reliable source on Wikipedia. Secondly WP:ACTOR requires multiple significant roles. I don't see any. If RS sources can be found that point to those multiple significant roles I will happily change my !vote. -Ad Orientem (talk) 19:43, 1 June 2014 (UTC)

• Delete. But weak delete. My take is Wong is a competent actor who works rather steadily, who has not had major roles, has zero contact with the press, or does not cultivate the press. I looked through twenty (20) SERP pages, using the minimal "web" filter (not the "news" filter) and basically found a few filmography-like sources from the NY Times, a film database, but not much else. No film reviewers commenting on how well she acted, no comments by her about film or TV or anything really, almost like she is an invisible actor? Does that make sense? So I am sensing she does not meet the general notability guideline, although her filmography suggests she is a steady actor. Still, any admin closing this debate ought to take a good look at these [http://stats.grok.se/en/latest90/Kea_Wong pageview statistics], with eyeball counts over 1000 in one day recently, so there may be protest from fans if this article gets axed. Glad I'm not making the final call.--Tomwsulcer (talk) 00:43, 11 June 2014 (UTC)

:*That's why Admins get those big salaries. -Ad Orientem (talk) 00:54, 11 June 2014 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.