Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kobolediator
:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. per WP:SNOW, there is no point in dragging this on. Eddie891 Talk Work 09:00, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
=[[:Kobolediator]]=
:{{la|1=Kobolediator}} – (
:({{Find sources AFD|title=Kobolediator}})
Subject fails GNG where no significant coverage from independent and reliable sources where the sources talk above the subject in length and depth for verification Cassiopeia talk 23:42, 18 April 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. Cassiopeia talk 23:42, 18 April 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements and Video games. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:07, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
:Delete, no indication of importance or any coverage whatsoever. No suitable redirect target as parent work is also not notable. ~ A412 talk! 04:19, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
- Delete per above. This is an unsourced page about a video game character, which gives us no allegations of notability. Borderline speedy. Bearian (talk) 05:41, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
:Speedy delete per others. No notability present in this at all. Magneton Considerer: Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) 06:11, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
:*Speedy delete. Too ridiculous to even need the AfD process. MimirIsSmart (talk) 10:27, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
::I don't think this is speedyable. Video game content isn't A7 eligible, and it's not A11 eligible as it's not a product of the article creator. ~ A412 talk! 15:12, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
:Delete, no indication of importance let alone notability, although doesn't fit WP:A7 (video game characters aren't in the list) so speedy deletion isn't an option. Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 10:56, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
:* Delete - per above.
:WormEater13 (talk • contribs) 18:34, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
- Delete no notability jolielover♥talk 06:19, 21 April 2025 (UTC)
:WP:SNOW close please, it's lio! | talk | work 06:39, 21 April 2025 (UTC)
- Delete: Very clearly fails GNG. Somebodyidkfkdt (talk) 15:13, 21 April 2025 (UTC)
- Delete, as per above rationale--Kentuckyfriedtucker (talk) 21:49, 21 April 2025 (UTC)
- Delete per above, clearly fails GNG. GoldRomean (talk) 22:35, 21 April 2025 (UTC)
- Delete: There are no reliable sources that even begin to discuss this character. ―Susmuffin Talk 08:00, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
- Delete per all. Clearly fails WP:SIGCOV, among other policies. Shooterwalker (talk) 15:48, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
{{clear}}
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.