Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lee Du-haeng

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 00:42, 12 November 2024 (UTC)

=[[:Lee Du-haeng]]=

:{{la|1=Lee Du-haeng}} – (View AfDView log | edits since nomination)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=Lee Du-haeng}})

No secondary sources. Fails WP:NTRACK. Placed 32nd at one Olympics. Fails WP:BASIC. AusLondonder (talk) 16:36, 21 October 2024 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople and South Korea. AusLondonder (talk) 16:36, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
Some coverage:
{{Cite news|url=https://www.donga.com/news/Sports/article/all/20141020/67292611/1|newspaper=The Dong-a Ilbo|language=Korean|title=[2014 경주국제마라톤]서른에 입문 늦깎이 “아들 위해 뛰었다”|date=October 20, 2014|trans-title=[2014 Gyeongju International Marathon] A late bloomer who started at age 30 “I ran for my son”}} (c. 220 words)
{{Cite news|url=https://www.kgnews.co.kr/news/article.html?no=301864|title=늦깎이 마라토너 고양시청 '이두행' 런던行 확정 - 경기신문|trans-title=Late bloomer marathon runner Goyang City Hall ‘Lee Du-haeng’|newspaper=KGNews|date=April 10, 2012}} (c. 170 words)
BeanieFan11 (talk) 17:04, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Olympics and Sport of athletics. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:28, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
Comment: Also placed in the top 8 at continental championships. He did not take up athletics at age 30, but took up marathon near that age. Geschichte (talk) 06:23, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
Keep via coverage above plus more under subject's Korean name "이두행": {{Google|"이두행"}}. The bar for NBASIC is met. --Habst (talk) 13:04, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
:Which pieces of coverage do you find when finding "more"? Geschichte (talk) 13:35, 27 October 2024 (UTC)
::@Geschichte, here are some examples:
::* {{cite web|url=http://www.hnews.co.kr/news/articleView.html?idxno=20255|trans-title=Haenam County Office Track and Field Team Player Lee Du-haeng Wins Two Gold Medals|language=ko|title=해남군청 육상팀 이두행 선수 2관왕}}
::* {{cite web|url=https://sports.news.nate.com/view/20120812n15708|trans-title=Lee Doo-haeng, Men's Marathon 32nd Place, Jang Shin-kwon, Jeong Jin-hyeok Also Finish|language=ko|title=이두행, 男 마라톤 32위로 골인…장신권, 정진혁도 완주}}
::--Habst (talk) 14:31, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
:::None of those two articles are significant coverage Geschichte (talk) 20:22, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
::::@Geschichte, how are the articles not significant, especially when combined with the above two as WP:NBASIC prong 1 allows for? --Habst (talk) 14:04, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
:::::The "Haenam County Office" is not significant because the part about him is literally two sentences long. What do you think significant means? Geschichte (talk) 23:42, 9 November 2024 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Doczilla _{Ohhhhhh, no!} 18:21, 28 October 2024 (UTC)

Keep: Sources cited above seem ok, they are about this individual and are in RS. I think we have notability. Oaktree b (talk) 15:05, 30 October 2024 (UTC)
~~Delete~~. The two cited sources above are routine event results with at most three sentences of (again, routine) secondary coverage. Nowhere close to GNG. The sources mentioned earlier are not SIGCOV enough to overcome the requirement for SUSTAINED coverage. JoelleJay (talk) 00:02, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
Sources from multiple years apart are not sustained coverage? BeanieFan11 (talk) 00:06, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
:Oh I misread the marathons as being the same. I'll reconsider. JoelleJay (talk) 18:11, 4 November 2024 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:26, 4 November 2024 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.