Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leinster Senior College

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 22:21, 7 July 2020 (UTC)

=[[:Leinster Senior College]]=

:{{la|Leinster Senior College}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Leinster_Senior_College Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Leinster Senior College}})

Promotional article created by a WP:SPA Does not satisfy WP:NSCHOOL. A WP:BEFORE does not reveal reliable sources which would help the article satisfy notability criteria. AugusteBlanqui (talk) 09:42, 30 June 2020 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Megan Barris (Lets talk📧) 09:51, 30 June 2020 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ireland-related deletion discussions. Megan Barris (Lets talk📧) 09:51, 30 June 2020 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 09:58, 30 June 2020 (UTC)

Delete per nom. I previously [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=965260167&oldid=965258654&title=Leinster_Senior_College removed] the WP:VANITY cruft, and my own WP:BEFORE indicated a dearthof independent, third-party reliable sources, but having filleted the article, the optics don't look too good to then send to AfD. So thanks to the nominator for being on the ball with this one. ——Serial ^# 10:06, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
Delete. When this was created, secondary schools were typically considered notable. However, [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=&oldid=767023947#RfC_on_secondary_school_notability since the 2017 RFC], secondary schools are typically expected to meet WP:ORG/WP:GNG. I don't see that this subject meets those criteria. While there has been some coverage of the subject or its activities in otherwise reliable sources (like [https://www.independent.ie/irish-news/news/school-principal-is-boxing-clever-to-tackle-mobile-use-in-class-38742151.html this kind of thing in the Irish Independent] or [https://www.irishtimes.com/news/former-bruce-college-principal-to-set-up-grind-school-1.1058650 this in the Irish Times]), there isn't sufficient coverage to meet the expectation of "significant coverage". (In that, for example, the above examples are among the only example of the subject being covered in any depth by the two Irish newspapers of record. Any other examples I can find being [https://www.irishtimes.com/topics/topics-7.1213540?article=true&tag_organisation=Senior+College trivial passing mentions].) I'm just not seeing it. Guliolopez (talk) 13:50, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
Delete - as above. The rules are stricter now, and even before, this final exam school article was dubious. No evidence that passes GNG. At best, given some (weak) refs, Move to Draft.SeoR (talk) 13:08, 3 July 2020 (UTC)
Delete per nom. Not notable. Spleodrach (talk) 07:57, 7 July 2020 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.