Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lower rusocician

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Complex/Rational 14:06, 2 March 2025 (UTC)

= [[:Lower rusocician]] =

{{AFD help}}

:{{la|1=Lower rusocician}} – (View AfDView log | edits since nomination)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=Lower rusocician}})

Not a single search result for "Lower Rusocician", "Dolno Rusocicki" or "Delnjo Ruzōciki" on Google or Google Scholar. At best a non-notable local dialect, at worst a complete hoax. Contested draftification. Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 13:21, 23 February 2025 (UTC)

  • Delete. No content found on any search engine. No source and failing WP:GNG. Deletion is the only option. Sackiii (talk) 13:24, 23 February 2025 (UTC)
  • :i don't think think thats necesary but i mean like you can delete it but its spoken there are no sources because its not recognized by the people and others. Yihanbai98 (talk) 13:35, 23 February 2025 (UTC)
  • :or maybe the person who made it meant an non-notable local dialect Yihanbai98 (talk) 13:37, 23 February 2025 (UTC)
  • ::Hi, just curious, how did you find this AfD on your very first edit? Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 15:05, 23 February 2025 (UTC)
  • :::ohh my friend told me to go here Zdyhan (talk) 17:31, 23 February 2025 (UTC)
  • :::oke please delete this already i don't need it on wikipedia Zdyhan (talk) 17:31, 23 February 2025 (UTC)
  • Comment: In a case where this is not deleted (i.e. merged, kept, redirected). Someone kindly do a WP:HISTMERGE with Draft:Lower rusocician as an editor just cut and paste the article. Also, No opinion Warm Regards, Miminity (Talk?) (me contribs) 14:17, 23 February 2025 (UTC)
  • Delete. Seems like a WP:HOAX. I am concerned that the new editor who created this is mostly edit warring adding weird niche "local" names to article, and now this. On his talk page they say they are doing this for fun b/c they don't know what else to do on Wikipedia. WP:NOTHERE is a concern. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 14:32, 23 February 2025 (UTC)
  • Delete - most likely should have been speedied. Fails GNG.Onel5969 TT me 10:50, 24 February 2025 (UTC)
  • Delete: per nom Schützenpanzer (Talk) 21:34, 24 February 2025 (UTC)
  • Delete All signs point to something madeup. In any case, if this language is, as the article claims, "not recognized" then clearly the subject does not pass the WP:GNG test. Pichpich (talk) 20:39, 25 February 2025 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.