Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maaya Rajeshwaran

{{AFD help}}

:{{la|1=Maaya Rajeshwaran}} – (View AfDView log | edits since nomination)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=Maaya Rajeshwaran}})

All the sources are from her reaching the WTA 125 semi-final, indicating WP:BLP1E and she doesn’t seem to pass WP:NTENNIS either. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 18:56, 10 February 2025 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Sportspeople, Women, Sports, and India. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 18:56, 10 February 2025 (UTC)
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Tennis and Tamil Nadu. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:28, 10 February 2025 (UTC)

:Her recent run has had lots of coverage so I'd be inclined to Keep with multiple sources met. Reasonable shot of more achievements in near future. Draftify at worst. Canary757 (talk) 19:48, 10 February 2025 (UTC)

:Keep The combination of sources covering her recent WTA125 semi-final (not quite good enough for NTENNIS but close) with sources such as [https://www.hindustantimes.com/sports/tennis/indian-teenager-maaya-rajeshwaran-offered-one-year-contract-to-train-at-rafa-nadal-academy-in-spain-101734842873080.html] (Dec 2024) [https://thebridge.in/tennis/maaya-rajeshwaran-win-itf-junior-300-girls-singles-title-delhi-51499?infinitescroll=1] (Jan 2025) are enough to meet WP:GNG here. WP:BLP1E is impossible to applie to young talents as we have no way of telling whether {{tq|The person otherwise remains, and is likely to remain, a low-profile individual}}. This could end up being the peak of her career, but it's not our place to overrule the judgment call the sources have made. Iffy★Chat -- 19:57, 10 February 2025 (UTC)

::Both sources don't have any byline. Seems like routine coverage to me. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 20:25, 10 February 2025 (UTC)

• Keep I found more decent coverage on her, such as The Hindu [https://sportstar.thehindu.com/tennis/maaya-rajeshwaran-interview-profile-rafa-nadal-academy-in-mallorca/article69186867.ece], The Times of India [https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/sports/tennis/top-stories/maaya-new-hope-on-the-horizon/articleshow/118132613.cms], ESPN [https://www.espn.com/tennis/story/_/id/43762585/new-sania-mirza-15-year-old-maaya-rajeshwaran-revathi-charts-own-course-rafa-nadal-assist-mumbai-open], The New Indian Express [https://www.newindianexpress.com/cities/chennai/2024/Apr/02/young-stars-small-and-big-leaps], Mint [https://www.livemint.com/mint-lounge/ideas/tennis-mumbai-open-maaya-rajeshwaran-revathi-11739127293562.html] and even got the attention of the International Olympic Committee to do a feature on her [https://www.olympics.com/en/news/who-is-maaya-rajeshwaran-revathi-india-tennis-player]. As Iffy puts well above, WP:BLP1E doesn't apply because we don't know whether she'll remain a low profile individual (and it's not likely to remain either as a professional tennis player that can easily achieve more than this). Meets WP:GNG. Jovanmilic97 (talk) 10:53, 11 February 2025 (UTC)
• :All the above coverage is from her reaching the WTA 125 semi-final, which is exactly what WP:BLP1E describes. But the one from The New Indian Express is from 2024, which meets the bar for me. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 13:26, 11 February 2025 (UTC)
• Keep I feel she passes WP:GNG. The sorces are reliable, secondary and spread over many matches, not just one day. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Davidindia (talk • contribs) 11:42, 11 February 2025 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.