Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mairead McIntyre
:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Liz Read! Talk! 22:20, 24 May 2025 (UTC)
=[[:Mairead McIntyre]]=
:{{la|1=Mairead McIntyre}} – (
:({{Find sources AFD|title=Mairead McIntyre}})
I'm not seeing enough coverage in my searches for a standalone article. Probably WP:TOOSOON as of now for this very young footballer. JTtheOG (talk) 19:18, 17 May 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Women, Football, and Ireland. JTtheOG (talk) 19:18, 17 May 2025 (UTC)
Draftify – WP:TOOSOON. Svartner (talk) 19:31, 17 May 2025 (UTC)
::Since the creator (likely COI) has already moved the article out of draftspace prematurely once, I can't see any reason why they wouldn't do so a second time, even if backed by AfD. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 12:34, 18 May 2025 (UTC)
:::I hadn't seen, so I also endorse delete. Svartner (talk) 18:47, 19 May 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 12:12, 18 May 2025 (UTC)
- Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found which show significant coverage please ping me. GiantSnowman 12:14, 18 May 2025 (UTC)
- :@GiantSnowman JTW2023 (talk) 12:45, 18 May 2025 (UTC)
- ::Yes? GiantSnowman 12:46, 18 May 2025 (UTC)
- :::I have updated the page with more sources JTW2023 (talk) 12:49, 18 May 2025 (UTC)
- ::::@GiantSnowman JTW2023 (talk) 12:50, 18 May 2025 (UTC)
- :::::None of which show significant coverage. GiantSnowman 12:51, 18 May 2025 (UTC)
- Delete - best I can find is [https://www.independent.ie/regionals/sligo/sport/soccer/sligo-rovers-forced-to-forfeit-under-19-womens-tie-against-bohemians/a1047347052.html this image caption] Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 12:32, 18 May 2025 (UTC)
- Delete. Footballers (of any class/level/whatever) are not automatically notable. WP:SIGCOV and WP:NSPORTS need to be met. And, in this case, are not. Don't see point in WP:DRAFTIFYing or other WP:ATDs. Given prior patterns. (Also, while not strictly relevant to AfD and in fear of appearing a little pearl-clutchy, I don't know which is "worse": creating a title on a non-notable child that the author has a connection to - or creating a title with uncited BLP on a minor they don't know). Anyway: my recommendation is deletion... Guliolopez (talk) 18:49, 18 May 2025 (UTC)
- Delete Not notable child footballer with no significant coverage. Shrug02 (talk) 08:11, 19 May 2025 (UTC)
- Delete Lacks WP:SIGCOV, this is simply a case of WP:TOOSOON. The problem with adolescent players is what if the kid ends up becoming an accountant, then it is silly that they were ever given a page at all. If the person becomes more notable at a later date, then they will warrant inclusion. Gjb0zWxOb (talk) 22:15, 20 May 2025 (UTC)
- Delete. Not yet notable. We should wait a little longer to create articles about 16-17 year olds. Geschichte (talk) 19:18, 23 May 2025 (UTC)
- Delete. After exhaustive search in multiple languages, I was unable to find any evidence that the subject meets WP:GNG or WP:NATHLETE. ZachH007 (talk) 22:23, 23 May 2025 (UTC)
{{clear}}
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.