Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mark Van Vliet

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Relisted three times with the sole registered vote being delete. It's time to move on. Ad Orientem (talk) 01:52, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

=[[:Mark Van Vliet]]=

:{{la|Mark Van Vliet}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Mark_Van_Vliet Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Mark Van Vliet}})

fails WP:NHOCKEY and WP:GNG Joeykai (talk) 13:23, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 21:31, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 01:33, 23 May 2017 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, GSS (talk|c|em) 08:05, 30 May 2017 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:56, 3 June 2017 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:56, 3 June 2017 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:39, 6 June 2017 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, So Why 07:48, 14 June 2017 (UTC)

~~Keep~~ meets NHOCKEY point 4: "Achieved preeminent honors in a lower minor or major junior league" Power~enwiki (talk) 20:03, 14 June 2017 (UTC)

:: {{ping|Power~enwiki}} Please re-read the NHOCKEY guideline again, the SPHL (and other low level leagues) has not been proven to have players with presumed notability in any regard as described with the list linked in the first sentence of NHOCKEY. Yosemiter (talk) 20:47, 14 June 2017 (UTC)

::: Oh, I misread the article, I thought the honors were from his time in the ECHL. I remain neutral. Power~enwiki (talk) 21:07, 14 June 2017 (UTC)

Delete: only appears to have WP:ROUTINE coverage, so fails GNG by way of no significant coverage (regardless of NHOCKEY). Also fails NHOCKEY, highest achievement was an award in a lower league that has no presumed player notability per the NHOCKEY League Assessment, so the player must meet GNG to be proven notable. Yosemiter (talk) 20:47, 14 June 2017 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.