Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marko Čarapić

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Neither the nominator nor the single "per nom" presented a valid deletion rationale. Owen× ☎ 13:40, 16 August 2024 (UTC)

=[[:Marko Čarapić]]=

:{{la|1=Marko Čarapić}} – (View AfDView log | edits since nomination)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=Marko Čarapić}})

6 out of the 7 citations are for Google Books, and I see no inherent notability. Sir MemeGod ._. (talk - contribs - created articles) 04:00, 2 August 2024 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Serbia. Sir MemeGod ._. (talk - contribs - created articles) 04:00, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: History and Military. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 05:12, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
Comment: Courtesy ping to AfC accepter {{u|SafariScribe}}. Curbon7 (talk) 03:41, 4 August 2024 (UTC)
Comment: Additionally, can the nominator please clarify their rationale. I do not see how having coverage in books is an indicator of non-notability, and is actually quite the contrary from reality as we want coverage from (among other places) books. Inherent notability is also not a thing. Curbon7 (talk) 03:45, 4 August 2024 (UTC)
@Curbon7, I still don't understand the nominator's rationale. Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 07:25, 4 August 2024 (UTC)
:Apologies, I had it in my watchlist but never saw a mention of me. "Inherent notability" is just notability but I put an "inherent" in front of it, probably a bad choice of words on my part. I just see no notability besides a few books, and that's why I AfD'd it. Sir MemeGod :D (talk - contribs - created articles) 14:36, 8 August 2024 (UTC)

Comment. The nominator should be willing to reply in this discussion, but on the other hand the article doesn't make me grasp what Marko Čarapić did. WP:NOTINHERITED is possibly being failed here. Geschichte (talk) 13:58, 8 August 2024 (UTC)

Keep I dont see anything wrong with the information provided. Yes, there should be more information but this article is fine as a stub. Боки ☎ ✎ 18:05, 8 August 2024 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}
Relisting comment: Relisting. I also don't follow the deletion rationale. Coverage in a few books is very respectable if the coverage is significant. Are you stating you'd prefer a mention on a website to a book?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:33, 9 August 2024 (UTC)

Delete per nom. Catfurball (talk) 17:34, 9 August 2024 (UTC)

:• Keep - per Боки. Nvss132 (talk) 18:39, 9 August 2024 (UTC)

Keep: The sources listed are enough to establish notability. I don't understand the deletion rationale either. Procedural close is also hinted. The Herald (Benison) (talk) 08:53, 16 August 2024 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.