Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mary Abigail Fillmore

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) –Davey2010^Talk 03:09, 22 March 2016 (UTC)

=[[Mary Abigail Fillmore]]=

:{{la|Mary Abigail Fillmore}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Mary_Abigail_Fillmore Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Mary Abigail Fillmore}})

Delete: as non-notable. Would likely never have had an article had she not been the daughter of a POTUS. Notability not inherited. Quis separabit? 01:15, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
Merge with Millard Fillmore, which, surprisingly, does not contain a section on his family at present. Colonel Wilhelm Klink (Complaints|Mistakes) 01:30, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
Keep, good deal of secondary source coverage from multiple different reliable sources, at {{Find sources AFD|Mary Abigail Fillmore}}. — Cirt (talk) 02:20, 10 March 2016 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. —UY Scuti ^Talk 18:25, 16 March 2016 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. —UY Scuti ^Talk 18:25, 16 March 2016 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —UY Scuti ^Talk 18:26, 16 March 2016 (UTC)

Keep. Her unusual role as the "first lady" for her father, noted and described in multiple sources, warrants the separate article. --Arxiloxos (talk) 19:52, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
Keep She played an unusual role as mentioned above and there are enough sources for GNG. Megalibrarygirl (talk) 14:50, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
Keep as per above.--Tomwsulcer (talk) 22:39, 21 March 2016 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.