Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mithotyn

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Falconer (band). Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 13:26, 30 October 2020 (UTC)

=[[:Mithotyn]]=

{{AFD help}}

:{{la|Mithotyn}} – (View AfDView log)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=Mithotyn}})

Fails WP:NBAND. TheSandDoctor Talk 03:36, 12 October 2020 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. TheSandDoctor Talk 03:36, 12 October 2020 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. TheSandDoctor Talk 03:36, 12 October 2020 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sweden-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 06:52, 12 October 2020 (UTC)

  • Comment Found [https://www.metal.de/reviews/mithotyn-gathered-around-the-oaken-table-2698/amp/ Metal.de Album Review] and [https://www.sputnikmusic.com/bands/Mithotyn/6027/ Sputnikmusic]. I don't count Metal Storm as reliable (this time), since there are no staff written album reviews, only user generated ones. And the biography is copied from their Myspace page. I have never heard about them but I looked them up, and all I found were databases, streaming links and retail sites. GhostDestroyer100 (talk) 11:14, 12 October 2020 (UTC)
  • :{{re|GhostDestroyer100}} Please correct me if I am wrong, but it appears that the Sputnikmusic source are all crowdsourced reviews though? --TheSandDoctor Talk 20:04, 12 October 2020 (UTC)
  • :{{re|TheSandDoctor}} If I am right, there are staff written reviews which are considered reliable. Unfortunately all I have seen there are user reviews. But that doesn't mean anything... I haven't seen every review about every album of every band there. GhostDestroyer100 (talk) 17:29, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
  • ::{{re|GhostDestroyer100}} You are correct that if there are then that would be considered more reliable than at current, but also not every band out there has a Wikipedia article. At this point, we are heavily in WP:CRYSTAL and WP:NRV territory, with a potential of WP:NOTINHERETED where only one member of the group was notable enough to have an article (a fact currently on dispute) --TheSandDoctor Talk 02:58, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
  • :::{{re|TheSandDoctor}} Of course not every band out there has a Wikipedia article, I know that. Anyways, if we take Sputnikmusic out of the equation as well, then we are left with only one decent source (Metal.de) and one decent source is not enough. GhostDestroyer100 (talk) 18:03, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
  • ::::Per WP:MUSICRS it looks like sputnik is eliminated as RS due to the fact that it isn't a clearly marked staff or emeritus review. I agree that 1 source is not enough. --TheSandDoctor Talk 04:22, 16 October 2020 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Barkeep49 (talk) 00:59, 21 October 2020 (UTC)

  • Merge to Falconer (band). Two members from Mithotyn founded Falconer, so the connection is there. Mithotyn seems so borderline, but with a merge, the information would be retained. Geschichte (talk) 05:29, 28 October 2020 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.