Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/My Red Hot Nightmare

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete as a band that is not notable. That the subject does not meet the primary notability criterion, i.e. "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject", means it does not satisfy the inclusion criteria for a stand-alone article. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 10:31, 1 July 2009 (UTC)

=[[My Red Hot Nightmare]]=

:{{la|My Red Hot Nightmare}} ([{{fullurl:My Red Hot Nightmare|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/My Red Hot Nightmare}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

This is not a notable band. I searched for reliable sources mentioning them, and could only come up with one minor mention in Billboard:[http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=4xUEAAAAMBAJ&pg=PA44&dq=my+red+hot+nightmare] Fences&Windows 18:17, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

::Hmmm. Maybe... I need persuading that the members are independently notable, even if some of the members do have Wikipedia pages. Fences&Windows 19:54, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

::I think TenPoundHammer's comments also need to be taken into account. Has the band actually done enough to be considered notable? Mr_pand [talk | contributions] 21:50, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

  • Delete. Hammer hit the nail on the head......a group that never did asnything. Starting to question the notability of their long albumn too. Niteshift36 (talk) 21:06, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:59, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

  • Strong Keep Keep The User:DreamGuy posted, on my Talk Page a message 'advising' me not to waste my time contributing to this AFD discussion (to which he is contributing) with commentaries like 'Enough notable' and so. I want to have the opinion of WP users about this. Indeed contributions are to be justified, but in the case of My Red Hot Nightmare the claimed of the lack of any sound reason to have an article is quite rebutted by the 1 480 google hits !![http://www.google.com/search?hl=fr&q=%22My+Red+Hot+Nightmare%22&btnG=Rechercher&lr=] Rirunmot (talk) 10:04, 27 June 2009 (UTC).

::Google hits is not the same as notability... I probably have 1500 Google hits, I don't expect anyone to write an article about me. Fences&Windows 00:56, 28 June 2009 (UTC)

  • Delete I think Hammer is correct, this band isn't actually notable. Fuzbaby (talk) 01:57, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
  • Delete The bar for article space should include at least having done something or another. Just trivia, which fails WP:NOT. The part of WP:MUSIC that might apply is pushing things, especially in light of the lack of any sound reason to have an article. DreamGuy (talk) 14:37, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
  • Delete Bunch of guys formed a band, covered a Clash song, didn't work, moved on. (I'm sure we've all done that, I know I have). They may be individually notable, but this project deserves a mention in their individual articles, if that. Article claims that they are working on new material, but this isn't borne out by any news coverage, last mention was 2006.  pablohablo. 23:18, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

:*This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 13:53, 30 June 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.