Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nirjhor Cantonment Public School and College

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. asilvering (talk) 02:40, 5 May 2025 (UTC)

=[[:Nirjhor Cantonment Public School and College]]=

:{{la|1=Nirjhor Cantonment Public School and College}} – (View AfDView log | edits since nomination)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=Nirjhor Cantonment Public School and College}})

One of the Cantonment schools in Bangladesh. Not particularly notable. Similar articles were deleted. See ---- Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Riverview Cantonment Board School, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mohammadpur A. Gafur Government Primary School, Jalalabad Cantonment English School And College, Ramu Cantonment English School and College, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ramu Cantonment Public School and College etc.... Somajyoti ✉ 19:39, 27 April 2025 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations, Schools, and Bangladesh. Somajyoti ✉ 19:39, 27 April 2025 (UTC)

:Keep - there are a lot of highly notable Schools in Bangladesh, but simply they do not come to any news unless there is a incident. So finding citation for them is quite hard but they are notable. If you google you can find that. — Cerium4B —Talk? • 12:34, 30 April 2025 (UTC)

Delete - All the sources for this very new school are primary/not independent. We need sources that demonstrate this meets WP:GNG, which is to say, multiple sources with significant coverage in independent reliable secondary sources. Because the school is young, it seems unlikely there is anything out there, and we do ont list all schools uner the WP:NOT policy (Wikipedia is not a directory). Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 13:26, 30 April 2025 (UTC)
Keep, Yeah, it relates with WP:Three, It'll be nice and you should check sources to add something uncommon backed by sources, but of course I didn't see none of that being done by you right now, Wikipedia articles are not supposed to be edited and improved only by the creator of the article, if so, what are the point of contributions? This article is well-sourced. Macarius Ibne Mito (talk), 02:29, 1 May 2025 (UTC)
:You mention WP:THREE, so what three sources would you suggest best demonstrate significant coverage in independent reliable secondary sources? I don't see any but I'll be very happy to review any you propose. Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 09:27, 1 May 2025 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 07:34, 3 May 2025 (UTC)
Delete Insufficient coverage by independent, reliable secondary sources to pass WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 18:55, 3 May 2025 (UTC)
Delete. An announcement plus 3 or 4 primary accounts of a sports day held at this school do not constitute SIGCOV, and no other coverage has been identified. JoelleJay (talk) 17:36, 4 May 2025 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.