Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/P-6 (mountain lion)

{{AFD help}}

:{{la|1=P-6 (mountain lion)}} – (View AfDView log | edits since nomination)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=P-6 (mountain lion)}})

No indication why this would be a notable animal. There doesn't seem to be an article about the group it belongs to, so I see no good redirect target either. Fram (talk) 10:03, 11 April 2025 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Animal, Science, and California. Fram (talk) 10:03, 11 April 2025 (UTC)
• Delete: appears to be just a named animal, sourced mostly to the National Park Service in the USA. Dying isn't enough for notability. Oaktree b (talk) 14:02, 11 April 2025 (UTC)
• Neutral: I understand the position that not all animals tracked in this study are notable, and I would say this one is a borderline case. The main notability involves the inbreeding with her father, which was reported on by several notable sources and is directly responsible for construction of the Wallis Annenberg Wildlife Crossing, something I probably should have included in the article from the beginning.
• :I don't plan on making pages for every animal in the study, only the notable ones. If P-6 is to be on the non-notable side of the notable/non-notable dividing line, I will adjust my page-making decisions for this topic going forward. Additionally, if P-6 is to be considered not-notable, then P-2 should probably be considered not notable as well. However, I would strongly object to P-1, P-12, and P-64 being considered not notable. Gb321 (talk) 15:49, 11 April 2025 (UTC)
• Merge I think Mountain lions in the Santa Monica Mountains or similar could be an appropriate way to cover not only the at least six mountain lions that have articles but also others that have been tracked and received coverage but don't have enough content for an article. Reywas92^Talk 17:03, 11 April 2025 (UTC)
• :this is a good idea. I'll work on it. Gb321 (talk) 17:12, 11 April 2025 (UTC)
• :If you can provide more reliable sourcing, that would be a good option to !deletion Oaktree b (talk) 18:36, 11 April 2025 (UTC)
• :see: Mountain_lions_in_the_Santa_Monica_Mountains Gb321 (talk) 19:49, 11 April 2025 (UTC)

• Delete for failing GNG. SilverTiger12 (talk) 19:00, 14 April 2025 (UTC)
• Delete. Unfortunately not a biography showing significance in the cultural world. I'd make a good-faith suggestion about a mountain lion fan wiki. Geschichte (talk) 17:57, 17 April 2025 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.