Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/POHMELFS (2nd nomination)
=[[POHMELFS]]=
- {{Special:Prefixindex/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/POHMELFS}}
:{{la|POHMELFS}} ([{{fullurl:POHMELFS|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/POHMELFS (2nd nomination)}}&action=delete}} delete]) –
The 2 refs are to a blog (wp:rs), the external links fail encyclopedic notability (wp:n). -- Jeandré (talk), 2009-07-05t20:19z 20:19, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. —Beeblebrox (talk) 20:24, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
- Keep - It is included in the Linux kernel. -- Frap (talk) 21:34, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
- All of the reviews on there are done by members. Iowateen (talk) 02:38, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:01, 12 July 2009 (UTC){{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/POHMELFS (2nd nomination)||}}
- Delete: The only reliable source with significant coverage that I can find is [http://www.linux-mag.com/cache/7399/1.html this] Fails WP:N. Iowateen (talk) 01:40, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BJTalk 19:42, 18 July 2009 (UTC){{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/POHMELFS (2nd nomination)||}}
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.