Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul Townsend

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. SNOW... Tone 17:11, 30 November 2009 (UTC)

=[[Paul Townsend]]=

:{{la|Paul Townsend}} – (View AfD)(View log)

:({{findsources|Paul Townsend}})

notability? article was speedy deleted once before. Alan - talk 00:16, 30 November 2009 (UTC)

  • Keep - Paul Townsend is a notable string theorist (particularly stuff related M-theory). He coined the amusing phrase "p-branes" (referring to membranes of more than two dimensions). He is mentioned in numerous reliable sources ([http://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/science-news/4766813/The-answer-to-the-universe-and-everything.html example], [http://www.sfweekly.com/1999-02-10/news/m/4 example], [http://www.nzherald.co.nz/lifestyle/news/article.cfm?c_id=6&objectid=585424 example]). -- Scjessey (talk) 00:48, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
  • Keep. He's a Fellow of the Royal Society, and his articles have been cited hundreds of times and his h-index is somewhere over 30.[http://scholar.google.co.uk/scholar?q=%22paul%20townsend%22&oe=utf-8&rls=org.mozilla:en-GB:official&client=firefox-a&um=1&ie=UTF-8&sa=N&hl=en&tab=ws] He helped found M-theory with Ed Witten.[http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=SoZhv5feNQ4C&pg=PA203&dq=%22Paul+Townsend%22&ei=LxwTS8azFqO8zgTr1t3UDA#v=onepage&q=%22Paul%20Townsend%22%20superstring&f=false][http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=cQb2D2FNJJIC&pg=PA244&dq="Paul+Townsend"] Fences&Windows 01:21, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
  • FWIW, I get 71 as his GS h-index. Way beyond the numbers at which any disagreement typically occurs. —David Eppstein (talk) 06:11, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
  • Keep. The FRS saves us from any work digging for more debatable evidence of notability; it's a clear pass of WP:PROF #3. But if we do dig, there's plenty more: his paper Unity of superstring dualities has over 1000 citations in Google scholar, and [http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=author%3Apk-townsend even his tenth most cited] has over 300; that's a clear pass of #1, as well. —David Eppstein (talk) 01:35, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
  • Speedy Keep on basis (at least) of cites and FRS. Nominations as inappropriate as this one waste the time of editors. Did the nominator do WP:BEFORE? Xxanthippe (talk) 01:55, 30 November 2009 (UTC).
  • Keep: Passes WP:BIO. Joe Chill (talk) 02:01, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
  • Keep (as article creator) per Special:Whatlinkshere/Paul Townsend. --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 03:17, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
  • Note -- the article which was speedy-deleted before was about a musician named Paul Townsend, claimed to be Pete's younger brother. --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 15:46, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
  • Keep. FRS, very high citability, more than enough to pass WP:PROF. Nsk92 (talk) 10:44, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
  • Snow Keep. As David Eppstein points out, his status as a Royal Society Fellow (FRS) is a definitive clincher – proof of this status is furnished at the [http://royalsociety.org/Directory-of-Fellows-and-Foreign-Members/ Royal Society Fellows membership roll page]. Respectfully, Agricola44 (talk) 16:18, 30 November 2009 (UTC).

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.