Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pleasant View Village, Indiana

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Personally, I don't understand the objection to a Redirect because after this page is deleted, any editor can create one at this page title. But the consensus is no Redirect so one won't be created through this AFD. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:31, 21 March 2024 (UTC)

=[[:Pleasant View Village, Indiana]]=

:{{la|1=Pleasant View Village, Indiana}} – (View AfDView log | edits since nomination)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=Pleasant View Village, Indiana}})

The name pretty much tells all: this is yet another 1960-era subdivision, this time on the outskirts of Edinburgh instead of Columbus, but otherwise of a sameness with its other NN counterparts further south in the county. Mangoe (talk) 02:55, 14 March 2024 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and Indiana. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:15, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Redirect to German Township, Bartholomew County, Indiana, of which it is part and is listed, per Wikipedia:NGEO guidelines, ''If a Wikipedia article cannot be developed using known sources, information on the informal place should be included in the more general article on the legally recognized populated place or administrative subdivision that contains it." Djflem (talk) 06:07, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Delete, don't redirect ROTM housing tract; generic name makes it hopeless to search for information but I can't imagine any would be found even if it were called Ybrfovquixxqil Estates, because it's just a subdivision like countless others across nearly every county in the United States. A redirect is pointless, because per WP:NGEO "information on the informal place should be included in the more general article..." What information, other than "it exists"? That would be pointless trivia and violate WP:DUE. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 13:32, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
:How would it violate Wikipedia:DUE? That guideline has absolutely nothing to do with this subject or target. What is the point-of-view that concerns you? There countless towns populated places across nearly every across the United States, many if not most of them ROTM, so what's the point?. IDONTLIKEIT is an argument to avoid in AfD discussions. The target lists populated places within the township and a comprehensive encyclopedia should be comprehensive.Djflem (talk) 19:21, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Delete not redirect and remove from the German Township page. No need to list generic non-notable subdivisions like this on that page. Reywas92^Talk 15:06, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Delete This didn't exist prior to 1957 and is a subdivison. The person who titled this didn't even get the gnis class right. We definately do not need to put every subdivision into county and/or city articles. I agree with Reywas, get it off the township page too. SEE, https://www.newspapers.com/article/the-republic-subdivision-duh/143381788/. James.folsom (talk) 00:53, 15 March 2024 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.