Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ra (Cyrillic)

{{AFD help}}

:{{la|1=Ra (Cyrillic)}} – (View AfDView log | edits since nomination)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=Ra (Cyrillic)}})

After a WP:BEFORE check, this seems like WP:ONEDAY: "what if the Latin letter R was also its own letter in the Cyrillic alphabet? At the very least, it seems wholly like original research. Remsense ‥ 论 19:38, 18 January 2025 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Language, Mongolia, Belarus, Bulgaria, North Macedonia, Russia, Serbia, and Ukraine. Remsense ‥ 论 19:38, 18 January 2025 (UTC)

:This is my letter I'm making up but planing to propose some time we should keep this article BodhiHarp (talk) 19:44, 18 January 2025 (UTC)

::Don't make any more articles for things you are making up, it is a massive waste of others' time. See the link above, please. Remsense ‥ 论 19:47, 18 January 2025 (UTC)

:::What does it take to improve this article to be able to include this suggested letter as original research? BodhiHarp (talk) 19:51, 18 January 2025 (UTC)

::::You cannot have an article for something you made up. See the link above. Remsense ‥ 论 19:53, 18 January 2025 (UTC)

• Delete. Made up letter. Fulmard (talk) 20:00, 18 January 2025 (UTC)
• :This is a letter that doesn't currently exist in the Cyrillic alphabet, but deserves a place there. Cyrillic has an obvious hole in it, where this letter can, and should, belong. Cyrillic doesn't include any letter that can express the r sound (like in the word "red") that many from English speaking countries know. So this is an addition to fill that gap. Right now, this letter is being submitted to Unicode for official adoption. BodhiHarp (talk) 20:10, 18 January 2025 (UTC)
• ::Do not make another article until you understand our notability guideline, please. Every time you make an article like this, it requires the time and effort of a handful of other editors to delete it. Remsense ‥ 论 20:12, 18 January 2025 (UTC)
• Speedy delete - topic was made up by the article creator Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:41, 18 January 2025 (UTC)
• Delete per BodhiHarp. Yes, per the arguments of BodhiHarp which makes it abundantly clear that the page fails WP:NOT. Geschichte (talk) 20:50, 18 January 2025 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.