Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Raavi vari street
:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. j⚛e deckertalk 07:03, 22 May 2014 (UTC)
=[[Raavi vari street]]=
:{{la|Raavi vari street}} – (
:({{Find sources|Raavi vari street}})
I don't see why would a street in a village be notable enough to have separate article. Vanjagenije (talk) 09:01, 14 May 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. No assertion of notability, no sources, and Google turns up nothing. Doesn't have a WP:SNOWBALL's chance. Grayfell (talk) 09:21, 14 May 2014 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:36, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:36, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
- Speedy delete Clearly nothing notable about this street. Rcsprinter123 (message) @ 05:51, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
- Delete I agree it states no claim of notability, nor does it seem to have coverage. Of course in looking for sources, it should not be confused with "Raavi Vari Street" in the town of Tenali, in Guntur District of Andhra Pradesh, which has slightly more going for it, but probably not enough for notability either. See the opinion of editor Grutness at Wikipedia:STREET. --Bejnar (talk) 03:03, 17 May 2014 (UTC)
::I note, in passing, that the village of Yanamalakuduru is part of the greater urban area of Vijayawada city. --Bejnar (talk) 03:11, 17 May 2014 (UTC)
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.