Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rick Simpson

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 14:29, 2 February 2009 (UTC)

=[[Rick Simpson]]=

:{{la|Rick Simpson}} ([{{fullurl:Rick Simpson|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rick Simpson}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

Subject is inventor of a single unmarketed product, as such article does not assert notability for the subject. LK (talk) 10:21, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

Delete - Arguably speedy it, as offering misleading information about cancer treatments is definitely a form of disruption. AlexTiefling (talk) 11:21, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
Delete Per nom. This person isn't notable. Lugnuts (talk) 11:38, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
Delete, concievable that this treatment, if verifiable and covered by RS, should receive a mention in Hemp oil or Alternative medicine. The inventor himself however doesn't appear to be notable. In fact, the article is arguably a case (albeit weak) for WP:CSD#A7. Usrnme h8er (talk) 14:04, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:01, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
STRONG KEEP, A note for cancer patients: Royal Rife, Hoxsey Therapy, John Kanzius. 84.104.135.86 (talk) 15:43, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
Delete No independant sources. Edward321 (talk) 21:59, 1 February 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.