Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Riverview Tower

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Geschichte (talk) 10:45, 21 November 2020 (UTC)

=[[:Riverview Tower]]=

:{{la|Riverview Tower}} – (View AfDView log)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=Riverview Tower}})

The article does not meet WP:GNG or WP:NBUILD: "Buildings, including private residences and commercial developments, may be notable as a result of their historic, social, economic, or architectural importance, but they require significant coverage by reliable, third-party sources to establish notability." Does not have coverage that meets significant coverage by reliable, third-party sources to establish notability WP:RS, WP:SIGCOV and article makes no claim that there is historic, social, economic, or architectural importance. WP:BEFORE revealed advertising, WP:ROUTINE, WP:MILL coverage, and directory style listings. // Timothy :: talk 14:19, 6 November 2020 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. // Timothy :: talk 14:19, 6 November 2020 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Tennessee-related deletion discussions. // Timothy :: talk 14:19, 6 November 2020 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 04:56, 14 November 2020 (UTC)

Delete per nom. While it's a perfectly well-written article, it makes no claim of notability, and the building is clearly not notable under the relevant guidelines. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 06:38, 15 November 2020 (UTC)
Delete per nom and User:Bearian/Standards#Notability_of_skyscrapers. Bearian (talk) 22:14, 17 November 2020 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.