Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Searchlight (software)

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Conductor (company). Merging was suggested by most commentators, including one of the 'delete's. PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 16:15, 15 June 2016 (UTC)

=[[Searchlight (software)]]=

:{{la|Searchlight (software)}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Searchlight_(software) Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Searchlight (software)}})

An article about SEO software, created by a single-purpose account. Nothing in this article stands out to make this software notable. Srittau (talk) 15:34, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

Delete. There a bit of coverage listed in the article, but I'm not really seeing enough to make this obviously notable. Too many of the hits are press releases or look like glorified press releases. [http://adage.com/article/btob/conductor-upgrades-searchlight-seo-solution/286878/ This article] in Advertising Age is independent and in a mainstream trade magazine, but it's very short. This would probably be better covered briefly in the company's article. Toward that end, I guess I'd be alright with a merge, but I'm not sure why that's absolutely necessary. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 20:09, 27 May 2016 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:53, 29 May 2016 (UTC)

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2016 May 29. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 08:22, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
Weak keep There's independent coverage (e.g. TechCrunch). Suggest merging with company's article. Pburka (talk) 17:25, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Yellow Dingo (talk) 09:34, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. ^BE _CK ^Y _SA ^{Y L}E _S 15:26, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. ^BE _CK ^Y _SA ^{Y L}E _S 15:26, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. ^BE _CK ^Y _SA ^{Y L}E _S 15:26, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

Delete as searches only found a few links but by far nothing at all actually convincing, nothing else noticeably salvageable. SwisterTwister talk 06:10, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

Merge to Conductor (company), which will improve the merge target. Source searches are not providing enough coverage to qualify a standalone article. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 15:40, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.