Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sex and music

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. WP:SNOW, too many problems with this article to be fixed Tone 20:36, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

=[[Sex and music]]=

:{{la|Sex and music}} ([{{fullurl:Sex and music|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sex and music}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

WP:OR KuroiShiroi (talk) 03:09, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

:WP:PROD removed by creator. KuroiShiroi (talk) 03:09, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

Delete as original research. --TeaDrinker (talk) 04:12, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
Delete: Per WP:NOT. South Bay (talk) 04:34, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
Delete as original research. --Nick—^Contact/_Contribs 06:12, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
Strong delete per WP:OR. Coldmachine^Talk 07:27, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
Delete Original research about an obvious conclusion that needs no article. Nate • (chatter) 08:42, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
Delete, and remind the author that correlation is not causation (and Wikipedia is not a publisher of essays). Zetawoof_(ζ) 09:15, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
Speedy delete per WP:SNOW. Obviously unencyclopedic, fails WP:NOT. Ottre 11:34, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
Delete, original research. We've got trouble! Right here in River City! - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 14:34, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.