Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Siddiq Ismail

:{{la|Siddiq Ismail}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Siddiq_Ismail Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Siddiq Ismail}})

Written from a fan's point of view. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 13:55, 4 September 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. -- 1Wiki8Q5G7FviTHBac3dx8HhdNYwDVstR (talk) 20:31, 4 September 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. -- 1Wiki8Q5G7FviTHBac3dx8HhdNYwDVstR (talk) 20:31, 4 September 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. -- 1Wiki8Q5G7FviTHBac3dx8HhdNYwDVstR (talk) 20:31, 4 September 2015 (UTC)

• Comment: That's an editing issue, not a reason for deletion. --Andreas Philopater (talk) 23:13, 4 September 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 05:24, 5 September 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 05:24, 5 September 2015 (UTC)

• Comment : I agree with the above comment by Andreas Philopater that it's an editing

issue,not a reason for deletion.I feel someone is jumping too quickly to the Deletion Option when it may be a minor editing issue.I have looked at this article a few times and tried to improve it although I am not the original writer of the article.Today I have re-checked many of the given Reference links and they seem to be working fine.So I don't see what's the big problem that the entire article should be deleted.Original writer may have written it from a 'fan's point of view' which your top template message box says that it is allowed in this case.If someone mentions specific wrong things in the article,I am willing to try and correct them.Thanks Ngrewal1 (talk) 17:51, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

• Keep Article needs rewriting. The subject is a recipient of Sitara-i-Imtiaz and Pride of Performance, both of which are top civilian awards. That is sufficient grounds for notability in my view. Mar4d (talk) 12:11, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
• I agree with above mentioned remark.Wikibaba1977 (talk) 08:09, 15 September 2015 (UTC)

• Weak keep simply because he seems to have gotten local coverage and thus this honestly needs better familiar attention, my searches found nothing which isn't surprising but, again, this will need to be improved. SwisterTwister talk 05:34, 23 September 2015 (UTC)
• Keep With all due respect to everyone that is raising questions about Siddiq Ismail article's viability,I am wondering,"How could this non-commercial Pakistani singer that sings non-film, non-profit Naat songs in a local language

for local Pakistani public...can get 'coverage' internationally? This is a sincere question and my hope is that it's taken that way. The best the poor guy can hope for is recognition by the local Pakistani people which he has gotten after over 40 years of service by getting many prestigious awards by the Government of Pakistan.Again,I am willing to improve the article in the future,if and when I see more new info and sources on him.Of course I am a fan and I can try to be objective as Wikipedia wants me to be.Wikipedia policy also allows me to write some articles from a 'fan's point of view'.Thanks Ngrewal1 (talk) 22:02, 23 September 2015 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.