Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Siege of Bahrain (1811)
:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. ✗plicit 03:57, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
=[[:Siege of Bahrain (1811)]]=
:{{la|1=Siege of Bahrain (1811)}} – (
:({{Find sources AFD|title=Siege of Bahrain (1811)}})
One amongst many poorly sourced and unverifiable articles by this editor. Doesn't seem notable. HistoryofIran (talk) 03:56, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events, History, Military, Bahrain, and Iran. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 05:16, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete this is all very dubious, I must say. Yes, poorly sourced and yes, unverifiable and what's more blithering rot. Lorimer{{cite book |last1=Lorimer |first1=Gordon |title=Gazetteer of the Persian Gulf. Vol I. Historical |date=1915 |publisher=Government of Bombay |pages=843}} tells us that the Omanis attacked Bahrain, under-defended by the Wahhabis, in 1811 together with the Utub. That's it. Of Qajars, there were none. Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 11:10, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
{{Reflist-talk}}
- Delete per above. CitrusHemlock 18:51, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete blithering rot and complete poppycock. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 11:40, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
{{clear}}
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.