Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Siege of Panhala (1692–1694)
:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. ✗plicit 03:44, 21 April 2025 (UTC)
=[[:Siege of Panhala (1692–1694)]]=
:{{la|1=Siege of Panhala (1692–1694)}} – (
:({{Find sources AFD|title=Siege of Panhala (1692–1694)}})
There is no significant coverage about this siege in the sources, there are only passing mentions of it and none of the sources refer to it by the name it is titled as. Completely fails WP:N. CharlesWain (talk) 17:05, 13 April 2025 (UTC)
- Delete: per nom 𐩣𐩫𐩧𐩨 Abo Yemen (𓃵) 17:24, 13 April 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events, History, Military, and Maharashtra. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 18:38, 13 April 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 19:05, 13 April 2025 (UTC)
- Delete no WP:SIGCOV in sources at all. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 08:40, 14 April 2025 (UTC)
- Delete. 2 sources on the page and both are poor with no significant coverage and whether this was a seige. One source is snippet and the other has no significant coverage and does not mention seige. RangersRus (talk) 12:43, 14 April 2025 (UTC)
- :{{Ping|RangersRus}} The article had a potential, accordingly I have expanded significantly. Sources give 5-6 pages of coverage. Shakakarta (talk) 17:00, 15 April 2025 (UTC)
- Keep: Quick before gives:
- {{Cite book|url=https://archive.org/details/the-mughal-maratha-relations-twenty-five-fateful-years-1682-1707/page/157/mode/1up?q=Panhala+|title=The Mughal Maratha Relations: Twenty Five Fateful Years (1682-1707)|last=G. T. Kulkarni|date=1983-04-22|pages=152–157}}
- {{Cite book|url=https://archive.org/details/maratha-war-of-independence-1680-1707-a-d/mode/1up|title=Maratha War Of Independence 1680-1707 AD|last=G. T. Kulkarni|date=1967-01-01|pages=152–157}}
- {{Cite book|url=https://archive.org/details/the-marathas-1600-1818-cambridge-history-of-india-vol.-2-part-4/page/96/mode/1up?view=theater&q=panhala|title=The Marathas - Cambridge History of India (Vol. 2, Part 4)|last=New Cambridge History of India|pages=97}}
- {{Cite book|url=https://archive.org/details/chhatrapati-rajaram-and-the-maratha-state/mode/1up|title=Chhatrapati Rajaram And The Maratha State|last=Jaisingrao Pawar|pages=123–126}}
If anyone can work on it then it can stand in mainspace. Maniacal ! Paradoxical (talk) 13:25, 14 April 2025 (UTC)
:The first of your sources does not provide any significant coverage to the actual conflict, there is perhaps only 3-4 sentences relating to this, but even that is questionable given how vague about the nature of the attack those statements are.
:You have cited incorrect page numbers ,the second source only provides a sentence in terms of coverage to this conflict,anyway it is an unpublished PhD dissertation and can't be used for notability. [https://archive.org/details/maratha-war-of-independence-1680-1707-a-d/page/n253/mode/1up]
:The third source only mentions this conflict in passing.
:Fourth of your source is an unpublished PhD dissertation which can't be used per WP:SCHOLARSHIP, regardless it doesn't provide the coverage either. In essence, this conflict is not notable in any way.CharlesWain (talk) 09:43, 15 April 2025 (UTC)
- Delete the above sources feels like WP:ITEXISTS. Still fails Significant coverage to be a standalone article.Hionsa (talk) 18:55, 14 April 2025 (UTC)
:{{Ping|Maniacal ! Paradoxical}} I have expanded the article. Shakakarta (talk) 17:01, 15 April 2025 (UTC)
{{clear}}
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.