Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sixer

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Sixers. -- RoySmith (talk) 17:41, 27 February 2019 (UTC)

=[[:Sixer]]=

:{{la|Sixer}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Sixer Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Sixer}})

One of many bands that never really made it. Though there is an AllMusic bio, I am not seeing sufficient indepth coverage to meet WP:GNG. Delete. Just Chilling (talk) 19:25, 11 February 2019 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 20:29, 11 February 2019 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Virginia-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 20:29, 11 February 2019 (UTC)

Delete - This one is a close call. In addition to an AllMusic profile they also got a fairly robust local media article here: [https://www.styleweekly.com/richmond/four-veterans-of-richmonds-music-scene-form-a-super-group-to-play-straight-up-rock/Content?oid=1386791]. But otherwise their coverage is routine listings of their existence in various genre directories and some gig announcements. Close but not quite enough coverage for their own article. Also note that there is a different band in the Christian rock field called Sixer Six. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 20:49, 11 February 2019 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ad Orientem (talk) 23:53, 19 February 2019 (UTC)

Delete. I don't think it is so borderline. The members are not notable. Their songs were not notable. No real RS on the band per se. This article has no long-term future on WP and will get deleted eventually. Britishfinance (talk) 15:44, 27 February 2019 (UTC)
Reappropriate as a redirect to Cub Scout#Organization, which is where I would expect typing "sixer" into the search box to go to. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 17:05, 27 February 2019 (UTC)

:*Comment - 'sixer' is quite a broadly used term so, for me, a redirect to Sixers would work better. Just Chilling (talk) 17:23, 27 February 2019 (UTC)

:::Yeah, that sounds good. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 17:23, 27 February 2019 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.