Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sonia Nemska

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 02:04, 28 June 2017 (UTC)

=[[:Sonia Nemska]]=

:{{la|Sonia Nemska}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Sonia_Nemska Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Sonia Nemska}})

Fails WP:ENTERTAINER Legacypac (talk) 00:45, 29 May 2017 (UTC)

Delete for reason listed above. St0n3 BG (talk) 02:35, 29 May 2017 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 01:02, 29 May 2017 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bulgaria-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 01:02, 29 May 2017 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 01:02, 29 May 2017 (UTC)

Keep the artist is clearly notable if we look at the original Bulgarian article. Yes the English stub needs expansion. There is now an 'Expand Bulgarian' tag on it. In ictu oculi (talk) 21:33, 31 May 2017 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:24, 5 June 2017 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 14:03, 12 June 2017 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ad Orientem (talk) 02:40, 20 June 2017 (UTC)

Delete - I can't find any coverage to show that they pass WP:GNG, and the mere fact that they have an article on another wiki is not a reason to keep. That article is even more poorly referenced than this one. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 21:02, 27 June 2017 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.