Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Soraca Jonin

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Liz Read! Talk! 08:47, 22 January 2024 (UTC)

=[[:Soraca Jonin]]=

{{AFD help}}

:{{la|1=Soraca Jonin}} – (View AfDView log | edits since nomination)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=Soraca Jonin}})

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NBIO. WP:NOTINHERITED. Longhornsg (talk) 06:44, 15 January 2024 (UTC)

  • Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Religion, and Ireland. Longhornsg (talk) 06:44, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Delete. Non-notable. Scolaire (talk) 09:26, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Delete. The entire article appears to be based on a single 17th century inscription/plaque in Ross Errilly Friary. The suggested familial connection to Charles Edward Jennings (born a century later) is weak, questionable and largely irrelevant. Cannot see any justification (relative to any applicable NBIO or GNG criteria) to retain this title. Guliolopez (talk) 12:26, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
  • :Comment. For good order, I have added the (scant) sources, that I found in my own WP:BEFORE, [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Soraca_Jonin&diff=1197749997&oldid=1195786113 to the article]. And updated to at the very least attribute some of the speculation the article contains. So it is clear(er) who is/was doing the speculating. As noted above, the only sources I can find ALL relate to the inscription in Ross Abbey. And involve speculation from the antiquaries/writers (who observed the inscription) as to who the subjects of the inscription might have been. This kind of "coverage", in all honesty, would seem to erode (rather than contribute) to notability. As it emphasises that no substantive biographical sources appear to be available. Which we would expect to find (even in the 17th century), if the subject was notable... Guliolopez (talk) 20:17, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Delete - not a notable figure. Spleodrach (talk) 13:53, 20 January 2024 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.