Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stenger-Wasas Process

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. –Juliancolton | Talk 00:35, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

=[[Stenger-Wasas Process]]=

:{{la|Stenger-Wasas Process}} ([{{fullurl:Stenger-Wasas Process|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stenger-Wasas Process}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

This article was originally proposed for deletion with the comment, "Article for which all attempts to find reliable sources to verify them have failed." I searched for indications of notability, but as far as I can tell, there is no mention of this chemical process (by this name at least) in the scientific literature (Chemical Abstracts, etc). One reference in the article is simply a link to the company that is promoting this new technology and is therefore not an independent source. The other reference is a blog post discussing Stenger-Wasas Process which notes the lack of available information. For these reasons, I don't think the article meets Wikipedia inclusion guidelines for either notability (WP:N) or verifiability (WP:V). -- Ed (Edgar181) 20:34, 17 June 2009 (UTC)

  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 20:40, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
  • Delete - essentially original research. Bearian (talk) 00:28, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
  • Delete. I searched when it was prodded and came up blank for reliable sources. Until this gets some coverage in reliable secondary sources, there's no way we can have an article on it. All I could find was some blogs mentioning it. Fences&Windows 00:34, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
  • Delete, I can't find any reliable sources on this process under this name or any other. Tim Vickers (talk) 03:14, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.