Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sven Kloster

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was ‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__ keep. Sjakkalle (Check!) 17:27, 10 March 2025 (UTC)

=[[:Sven Kloster]]=

:{{la|1=Sven Kloster}} – (View AfDView log | edits since nomination)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=Sven Kloster}})

Rejected at AFC for notability, then moved without improvement to article space with comment "No reason given, would it pass AFC? Yes." So bringing it to AFC to formally answer that question. - UtherSRG (talk) 13:03, 3 March 2025 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Sportspeople, Football, and Norway. UtherSRG (talk) 13:03, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
Keep, a start-class article with multiple references containing Wikipedia:Significant coverage: in-depth, about the person and following him through several years. Rejecting because sources are offline is invalid. Geschichte (talk) 13:26, 3 March 2025 (UTC)

Keep - There is multiple SIGCOV sources, and he has played 123 games for Start, making him a notable player. – RossEvans19 (talk) 16:27, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
Weak keep – The athlete's coverage is mostly based on a local newspaper (Fædrelandsvennen). Questionable, but I understand that it is enough for a stub. Svartner (talk) 22:30, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 20:07, 4 March 2025 (UTC)
Keep per Geschichte's arguments about offline sources, and AGFing that they are significant. Giant Snowman 20:10, 4 March 2025 (UTC)
Keep The sources are offline, so I have to AGF here - but Kloster would completely clear the old SNG with flying colours and the article is of decent quality and can be verified so I'm not concerned about notability at all. SportingFlyer T·C 07:25, 5 March 2025 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.