Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Third Best

=[[Third Best]]=

:{{la|Third Best}} ([{{fullurl:Third Best|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Third Best}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

No evidence that this is a notable blog. A [http://www.google.com/search?oe=utf-8&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&um=1&hl=en&q=%22Third%20Best%22%20%22The%20Age%22%20blog&ie=UTF-8&sa=N&tab=nw search] is problematic because it returns a lot of things that The Age refers to as "Third Best" of something but I've been unable to find any evidence of notability. It's an Age-hosted blog but the blog doesn't inherit notability from its host. I don't believe a merge is appropriate since The Age doesn't cover its blogs and I think covering this would lead to undue featuring of this blog. TravellingCari 16:50, 8 September 2008 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.