Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tony Sarre

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Arbitrarily0 (talk) 00:57, 22 February 2010 (UTC)

=[[Tony Sarre]]=

:{{la|Tony Sarre}} – (View AfDView log{{•}} {{plainlink|1=http://toolserver.org/~betacommand/cgi-bin/afdparser?afd={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tony Sarre}}|2=AfD statistics}})

:({{findsources|Tony Sarre}})

A heart-warming tale, but one article in The Age does not notability make. And other than that article, I didn't find any coverage in secondary reliable sources. Fences&Windows 00:36, 31 January 2010 (UTC)

  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. -- Fences&Windows 00:38, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. -- Fences&Windows 00:38, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
  • Delete Does not pass WP:CREATIVE or WP:GNG. --Mkativerata (talk) 20:38, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
  • I am tempted towards Keep. Apart from the age article there is long bio [http://blindcanadians.ca/publications/?id=928 here] from the "Alliance for Equality of Blind Canadians", a very brief mention in the [http://www.screenwest.com.au/go/news/blind-ambition WA govt] site screenwest, he was one of the features in issue 14 (February 2007 ) of the Scoop Magazine (a WA printed lifestyle glossy - looks related to screenwest). Perhaps this is all there is, but I am reminded that not everything is online - Peripitus (Talk) 08:13, 1 February 2010 (UTC)

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget 00:24, 7 February 2010 (UTC)

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget 00:31, 14 February 2010 (UTC)

  • Keep per Peripitus. [http://blindcanadians.ca/publications/?id=928 This] and [http://www.theage.com.au/news/Film/Blind-faith/2004/12/02/1101923267474.html this] together satisfy WP:GNG in my opinion. Jujutacular T · C 16:00, 14 February 2010 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.