Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tralalero Tralala

{{AFD help}}

:{{la|1=Tralalero Tralala}} – (View AfDView log | edits since nomination)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=Tralalero Tralala}})

Just another internet meme with minimal WP:RS coverage. Does not meet WP:WEBCRIT, failing both WP:NWEB and WP:GNG. AdobongPogi (talk) 09:44, 2 June 2025 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. AdobongPogi (talk) 09:44, 2 June 2025 (UTC)

:Keep or merge: Alt of the article creator here, the article cites reliable sources like Vulture and The Daily Dot. It also cites well-received Italian sources like Ilpost. TheGoofWasHere (talk) 01:54, 2 June 2025 (UTC)

::*Comment: This can be merged with the larger Italian Brainrot article, perhaps as an "origin" section with content from this article, alongside citations from this article. Also worth noting, Excélsior, a well received Mexican news source is cited here. The citations are in depth, so it passes WP:WEBCRIT, GNG, and NWEB

::TheGoofWasHere (talk) 02:07, 2 June 2025 (UTC)

• Merge to Italian brainrot. Reliable sources describe the character in limited detail while discussing the series in general. Per WP:NOPAGE, it would be beneficial for readers to find this information in just one article about the broader topic that provides the full context. ObserveOwl (talk) 02:15, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
• :redirect please 2607:FEA8:3360:7600:9469:BA9F:D5F7:27E0 (talk) 20:22, 2 June 2025 (UTC)

:*Comment: I've added parts of this article to Italian brainrot, so a simple redirect can suffice

:Thegoofhere (talk) 22:56, 2 June 2025 (UTC)

• Merge, nothing in the article that couldn't be part of the main Italian Brainrot article
• Merge with Italian brainrot: as the character is also covered there. Not notable for a stand alone article. Golem08 (talk) 03:04, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
• :Yes, we agree that there is already a topic on that article. Why would a meme has an article of a related topic? 2001:448A:11A6:1A09:CC86:E48D:F757:401E (talk) 20:47, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
• Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2025 June 4. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 02:19, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
• Merge with Italian brainrot: Per above Halley ^{luv Filipino ❤} (Talk) 02:31, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements, Animal, and Italy. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:43, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
• Merge to Italian brainrot, not enough coverage for an article on its own. jolielover♥talk 13:40, 4 June 2025 (UTC)

:Merge to Italian brainrot per above Underdwarf58 (talk) 13:49, 4 June 2025 (UTC)

::Yes, we agree with that. No fictional character articles of a related article, except for some fictional works. Although this a fictional work, it is actually a meme, not a work of literature. 2001:448A:11A6:1A09:CC86:E48D:F757:401E (talk) 15:45, 4 June 2025 (UTC)

:Merge to Italian brainrot is very notable, but should be merged anyway. Carsonlee0205 (talk) 17:22, 5 June 2025 (UTC)

::Well, we agree with that. 2001:448A:11A3:16CA:890E:E0C5:BBD0:5C3E (talk) 18:52, 5 June 2025 (UTC)

::I agree! ThatAustralianBall (talk) 13:13, 7 June 2025 (UTC)

:Merge to Italian brainrot, since there's already a article about this meme series.
創新劇ゴジ

:Merge per all. This isn't separately notable and there is a suitable merge target, per WP:ATD. Shooterwalker (talk) 23:43, 5 June 2025 (UTC)

::Yes, merge it anyway. 2001:448A:11A3:1016:283C:FFFA:972B:AE04 (talk) 14:20, 6 June 2025 (UTC)

:::You don't need to reply every time someone calls for a merge. ObserveOwl (talk) 15:08, 6 June 2025 (UTC)

::::Oh, really? Why? 2001:448A:11A3:1016:283C:FFFA:972B:AE04 (talk) 15:57, 6 June 2025 (UTC)

:::::Because it's unnecessary and it's not like you're adding much TheGoofWasHere (talk) 02:24, 7 June 2025 (UTC)

:::::Also, you don't even need to reply to everyone, If you have a proposal, like to redirect, or just generally agree with other contributers, why don't you just open a comment? Cooldudeseven7 _{talk/contribs} 16:02, 9 June 2025 (UTC)

:I can't believe Italian brainrot is an actual well-sourced article (I feel my brain cells dying with every sentence I read), but yeah, merge per above. [[User:CanonNi]] (talk • contribs) 14:07, 7 June 2025 (UTC)

• Merge and redirect: Let's make this article into a redirect to "Characters' section. CreatorTheWikipedian2009 (talk) 15:24, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
• Merge with Italian brainrot: There is a high burden of notability for pokémon to have their own page and most don't fulfill it, so this fleeting meme certainly does not. Speederzzz (Talk) (Stalk) 11:02, 8 June 2025 (UTC)
• Merge with Italian brainrot: per above 𐩣𐩫𐩧𐩨 Abo Yemen (𓃵) 11:37, 9 June 2025 (UTC)
• Merge (and redirect to Characters) to Italian brainrot: Not only is the Italian Brainrot article larger, and related to this, merging could add more details, because of the presence of information about characters who are also in the same related field. This character does not need an independent article. Redirect because this is a specific character of Italian Brainrot. Cooldudeseven7. _{talk/contribs} 15:58, 9 June 2025 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.