Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trevor Grundy

{{AFD help}}

:{{la|Trevor Grundy}} – (View AfDView log)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=Trevor Grundy}})

Fails WP:NAUTHOR and the brief mentions of him in articles are not in-depth coverage. CaptainEek ^{Edits Ho Cap'n!}⚓ 20:57, 20 December 2020 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. CaptainEek ^{Edits Ho Cap'n!}⚓ 20:57, 20 December 2020 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 21:28, 20 December 2020 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 21:28, 20 December 2020 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 21:28, 20 December 2020 (UTC)

• Oh, I think the article should be left in Wikipedia. He is not famous-famous but he did make a name for himself. There are articles here about far less famous (british) people. His books was discussed a lot in newspapers back then and he was a well known figure when it came to former nazis. I think it's a bit important article which should stay.Uzrname (talk) 07:49, 21 December 2020 (UTC)
• Delete - WP:SIGCOV beats out WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. Bearian (talk) 20:50, 22 December 2020 (UTC)
• Subject requests deletion per WP:BLPREQUESTDELETE via OTRS with identity verified. OTRS agents can review ticket:2020122010005585. I have not personally reviewed this article and take no position on the deletion discussion. ‑‑ElHef (Meep?) 23:18, 26 December 2020 (UTC)

• Delete, the article is a summary of his book, a primary source. Geschichte (talk) 18:25, 5 January 2021 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.