Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tufts Historical Review

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Tufts University School of Arts and Sciences. Tone 19:29, 2 May 2019 (UTC)

=[[:Tufts Historical Review]]=

:{{la|Tufts Historical Review}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Tufts_Historical_Review Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Tufts Historical Review}})

Article PRODded with reason "Non-notable journal (tagged for notability since 2013). Not indexed in any selective databases, no independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG." Article dePRODded by anonymous IP without reason stated. PROD reason still stands, hence: delete. Randykitty (talk) 07:22, 25 April 2019 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 09:24, 25 April 2019 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 09:24, 25 April 2019 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Colorado-related deletion discussions. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 09:24, 25 April 2019 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New Jersey-related deletion discussions. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 09:24, 25 April 2019 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academic journals-related deletion discussions. Randykitty (talk) 11:32, 25 April 2019 (UTC)

Delete -- A journal whose board consists wholly of undergraduates is unlikely to be a notable academic journal. Peterkingiron (talk) 17:10, 25 April 2019 (UTC)
Redirect to Tufts University School of Arts and Sciences; available sourcing suggests that it's well-regarded for the kind of publication that it is [https://doi.org/10.1080/10691316.2018.1456994][https://library.sacredheart.edu/undergradpublishing/journals][https://www.stonybrook.edu/commcms/ureca/feature/_bio/2015/June2015.php][https://liberalarts.tulane.edu/departments/history/academics/history-is-hands-on], so it's worth a mention there, but not a stand-alone article. XOR'easter (talk) 20:41, 25 April 2019 (UTC)
Redirect per above. Djflem (talk) 16:08, 26 April 2019 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.