Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/US itek
:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. ✗plicit 23:51, 18 March 2025 (UTC)
=[[:US itek]]=
:{{la|1=US itek}} – (
:({{Find sources AFD|title=US itek}})
Fails WP:NCORP. There is some routine coverage in WP:TRADES like [https://www.bizjournals.com/buffalo/print-edition/2013/04/05/usitek-moves-operations-to-building-in.html] but it is not enough to pass WP:CORPDEPTH. Gheus (talk) 14:31, 11 March 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and New York. Shellwood (talk) 14:33, 11 March 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Technology and Computing. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:20, 11 March 2025 (UTC)
- Delete: Can't find anything other than routine coverage and interviews/quotes from the founder. Helpful Raccoon (talk) 21:42, 14 March 2025 (UTC)
- Delete: An article on an IT services firm. The article is heavily ref-bombed by articles with in-role quotes about other industry topics from the company founder (on whom there is also a now-draftified biography, created by the same editor on the same day); these fall under :WP:CORPTRIV. The article is describing a firm going about its business, with the level of local announcement-based coverage that one would expect, and searching isn't turning up evidence of attained notability. AllyD (talk) 14:36, 17 March 2025 (UTC)
- Delete: Fails WP:NCORP. Sources do not meet WP:ORGCRIT- Imcdc Contact 07:08, 18 March 2025 (UTC)
{{clear}}
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.