Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/XB Machine (2nd nomination)
:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__ to XB Browser. ✗plicit 14:15, 1 June 2025 (UTC)
=[[:XB Machine]]=
{{Special:Prefixindex/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/XB Machine}}
:{{la|1=XB Machine}} – (
:({{Find sources AFD|title=XB Machine}})
Fails WP:GNG Clenpr (talk) 21:25, 10 May 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Computing and Software. Shellwood (talk) 22:01, 10 May 2025 (UTC)
- Redirect to xB Browser. It has been discussed mostly in connection to the xB Browser project [https://www.darkreading.com/perimeter/xerobank-launches-anonymizing-tool-suite][https://web.archive.org/web/20081104071609/http://www.americanchronicle.com/articles/52958][https://projects.nr.no/directdownload/4589/Fritsch_-_State_of_the_Art_of_Privacy-enhancing_Technology.pdf]. MarioGom (talk) 22:40, 10 May 2025 (UTC)
:*Delete Not much coverage about the machine itself. Redirect xB browser is an ok alternative too.
:Anonrfjwhuikdzz (talk) 03:12, 11 May 2025 (UTC)
- Delete: Not notable enough. It didn't have enough coverage in the 2000s and doesn't have enough now. — Itzcuauhtli11 (talk) 18:56, 11 May 2025 (UTC)
- Comment - an anonymous editor using an Orange España IP address removed refs before this AfD was initiated.[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=XB_Machine&diff=prev&oldid=1289759894 diff] MarioGom subsequently restored them. --A. B. (talk • contribs • global count) 05:32, 13 May 2025 (UTC)
- :I am not sure any of them are reliable sources to demonstrate notability. Clenpr (talk) 19:08, 13 May 2025 (UTC)
- ::AfD participants evaluate refs. It’s always inappropriate to delete any refs just before an AfD. Another editor thought the same thing and reverted those deletions. Editors are always sizing up their peers for trustworthiness and credibility. This type of thing doesn’t help. A. B. (talk • contribs • global count) 19:40, 13 May 2025 (UTC)
- :::What is your assessment for those references? Are them reliable sources? Clenpr (talk) 13:41, 15 May 2025 (UTC)
- ::::I already provided 3 sources above, which are way enough for a redirect. MarioGom (talk) 23:00, 15 May 2025 (UTC)
:
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 22:39, 17 May 2025 (UTC)
:
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Benison (Beni · talk) 07:34, 25 May 2025 (UTC)
{{clear}}
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.