Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Freemasonry/1

{{atopr}}

: {{al|Freemasonry|noname=yes}} • [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Good_article_reassessment/Freemasonry/1&action=watch Watch article reassessment page] • Most recent review

: {{#ifeq:{{PAGENAME}}|Good article reassessment/Freemasonry/1|Category:GAR/85}} Result: Delisted. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 14:21, 1 May 2025 (UTC)

There are uncited statements in the article. There is an "unreliable sources" orange banner at the top of "Islam and Freemasonry" section. Is this still valid? Z1720 (talk) 02:31, 30 March 2025 (UTC)

:It’s tricky… The sources cited in that section are reliable as primary sources for verifying what Islamic critics of Freemasonry claim about the fraternity… they are not reliable as secondary sources for saying that these claims are in any way accurate. Blueboar (talk) 16:55, 30 March 2025 (UTC)

::In the absence of secondary sources relaying what they say, they shouldn't be included at all, per WP:DUEWEIGHT. UndercoverClassicist ^T·C 17:14, 19 April 2025 (UTC)

{{abot}}