Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 March 10#1741644142

• {{no redirect|1 = Bob Sempl's tank }} → :Bob Semple tank  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: [{{fullurl:Bob Sempl's tank|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:main}}#Bob Sempl's tank closed as keep}}}} keep]/[{{fullurl:Bob Sempl's tank|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:main}}#Bob Sempl's tank closed as retarget}}}} retarget]/[{{fullurl:Bob Sempl's tank|action=delete&wpReason={{Urlencode:main}}#Bob Sempl's tank closed as delete}}&wpMovetalk=1}} delete] ] 

Implausible typo of an alternative name Schützenpanzer (Talk) 22:36, 10 March 2025 (UTC)

• Delete - We can't have every typo as a redirect, only the most common or understandable. This one is clearly not a common of understandable typo. Cheers, ✏️ C809 ⌨️ (let's chat) 14:29, 11 March 2025 (UTC)
• Delete per nom --Lenticel ^(talk) 01:03, 15 March 2025 (UTC)

:The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

• {{no redirect|1 = DreamWorks Animation Television (animation studio and production company) }} → :DreamWorks Animation Television  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: [{{fullurl:DreamWorks Animation Television (animation studio and production company)|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:main}}#DreamWorks Animation Television (animation studio and production company) closed as keep}}}} keep]/[{{fullurl:DreamWorks Animation Television (animation studio and production company)|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:main}}#DreamWorks Animation Television (animation studio and production company) closed as retarget}}}} retarget]/[{{fullurl:DreamWorks Animation Television (animation studio and production company)|action=delete&wpReason={{Urlencode:main}}#DreamWorks Animation Television (animation studio and production company) closed as delete}}&wpMovetalk=1}} delete] ] 

A long disambiguation, a shorter one might be better suited as a redirect? Would someone type this into the search bar? RanDom 404 (talk) 16:30, 10 March 2025 (UTC)

• Leaning keep: While it is long, it's not inaccurate, and I'm not seeing anything particularly wrong with it. For what it's worth, the short description of the page contains the phrasing "animation studio and production company". Hey man im josh (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 18:51, 10 March 2025 (UTC)
• Keep. Not inaccurate {{Tl|R from unnecessary disambiguation}}. Steel1943 (talk) 20:19, 10 March 2025 (UTC)

:The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

• {{no redirect|1 = Rain, paint mare }} → :Spirit: Stallion of the Cimarron  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: [{{fullurl:Rain, paint mare|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:main}}#Rain, paint mare closed as keep}}}} keep]/[{{fullurl:Rain, paint mare|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:main}}#Rain, paint mare closed as retarget}}}} retarget]/[{{fullurl:Rain, paint mare|action=delete&wpReason={{Urlencode:main}}#Rain, paint mare closed as delete}}&wpMovetalk=1}} delete] ] 

Adding a comma after the character name isn't necessarily making this a likely search variation. However, Rain is a character in the film. RanDom 404 (talk) 15:30, 10 March 2025 (UTC)

• This would be in reference to: {{tq|Rain was the first animated horse to receive an honorary registration certificate from the American Paint Horse Association (APHA).}} "Rain" being a common word, I can understand a redirect such as Rain (character), and less likely Rain (horse), but the redirect under discussion is not a good title. Delete. The pre-BLAR content was unsourced, probably original text. Also, the redirect is mentioned at Rain (disambiguation) in the "People" section and should be moved out from there, and we don't have an Animals or a non-people characters section. Jay 💬 16:08, 17 March 2025 (UTC)

:The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

• {{no redirect|1 = Tron rumored sequel (film) }} → :Tron#Sequels  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: [{{fullurl:Tron rumored sequel (film)|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:main}}#Tron rumored sequel (film) closed as keep}}}} keep]/[{{fullurl:Tron rumored sequel (film)|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:main}}#Tron rumored sequel (film) closed as retarget}}}} retarget]/[{{fullurl:Tron rumored sequel (film)|action=delete&wpReason={{Urlencode:main}}#Tron rumored sequel (film) closed as delete}}&wpMovetalk=1}} delete] ] 

Not a likely search term. RanDom 404 (talk) 15:30, 10 March 2025 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 20:18, 12 March 2025 (UTC)
• Delete per nom --Lenticel ^(talk) 00:48, 15 March 2025 (UTC)

:The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

• {{no redirect|1 = Marco Lubio }} → :Marco Rubio  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: [{{fullurl:Marco Lubio|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:main}}#Marco Lubio closed as keep}}}} keep]/[{{fullurl:Marco Lubio|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:main}}#Marco Lubio closed as retarget}}}} retarget]/[{{fullurl:Marco Lubio|action=delete&wpReason={{Urlencode:main}}#Marco Lubio closed as delete}}&wpMovetalk=1}} delete] ] 

Unlikely typo / not helpful search term. Hey man im josh (talk) 14:43, 10 March 2025 (UTC)

• Delete. {{Ping|Hey man im josh}} This may qualify for WP:G10. Steel1943 (talk) 20:17, 10 March 2025 (UTC)
• :how so? consarn _{(prison phone) (crime record)} 23:06, 10 March 2025 (UTC)
• ::...Lubricant. Steel1943 (talk) 23:14, 10 March 2025 (UTC)
• :::eh, don't think so. the whole r/l thing pretty much always takes priority over over sex jokes, and even then, i doubt the people making those jokes actually know what lube is consarn _{(prison phone) (crime record)} 10:52, 11 March 2025 (UTC)

• Delete as implausible search term. First of all, based on page history, it likely wouldn't qualify as G10. the intent wasn't to compare Mark Rubio to lubricant but a good faith attempt to add a "translated term used by Beijing". That being said, it definitely doesn't satisfy WP:RFOR by a longshot, and the transliteration isn't even correct (it should be lubiao— from either 卢比奥 or 鲁比奥 depending on the character used) — 🪫Volatile ^{📲T | ⌨️C} 03:55, 11 March 2025 (UTC)

:The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

• {{no redirect|1 = User:Reschly }} → :Special:Contributions/Reschly  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: [{{fullurl:User:Reschly|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:main}}#User:Reschly closed as keep}}}} keep]/[{{fullurl:User:Reschly|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:main}}#User:Reschly closed as retarget}}}} retarget]/[{{fullurl:User:Reschly|action=delete&wpReason={{Urlencode:main}}#User:Reschly closed as delete}}&wpMovetalk=1}} delete] ] 

Seems like an unnecessary redirect to Special:Contributions/Reschly to possibly promote a user's contributions The real JustSomeoneNo (talk) 14:33, 10 March 2025 (UTC)

• Keep as harmless and unproblematic. A user is perfectly entitled to redirect their user page to their contributions, and doing so is nor promotional in the slightest. Redirects to special pages do not work, functioning as soft redirects, so there isn't even any chance of confusion. Thryduulf (talk) 14:46, 10 March 2025 (UTC)
• Keep per Thryduulf. mwwv ^converse∫_edits 12:44, 11 March 2025 (UTC)
• Keep, there's nothing wrong with a user promoting their contributions. -- Tavix ^(talk) 15:33, 11 March 2025 (UTC)

:The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

• {{no redirect|1 = 2026 SA20 }} → :SA20  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: [{{fullurl:2026 SA20|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:main}}#2026 SA20 closed as keep}}}} keep]/[{{fullurl:2026 SA20|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:main}}#2026 SA20 closed as retarget}}}} retarget]/[{{fullurl:2026 SA20|action=delete&wpReason={{Urlencode:main}}#2026 SA20 closed as delete}}&wpMovetalk=1}} delete] ] 

per this recent-ish rfd, though it might not warrant a g4 because it was recreated as an article and then hit by the blar beam consarn _{(prison phone) (crime record)} 14:20, 10 March 2025 (UTC)

• Restore article without prejudice to AfD. We don't delete article content at RfD. Thryduulf (talk) 14:48, 10 March 2025 (UTC)
• :eh, i think this is more of a "restore and send to afd" case. admittedly, i'm not the biggest expert on the matter, but it seems that the most reliable sources in the pre-blar content (citations 2, 3, and 5) only actually might be reliable. unless someone who is more experienced in the south african cricket scene than me can opine here, in which case i'll uncritically believe their assertions :3 consarn _{(prison phone) (crime record)} 15:07, 10 March 2025 (UTC)
• ::When I say "without prejudice to AfD" it's because I have no strong opinion on whether it should go to AfD or not and I'm not advocating for or against it being nominated. Thryduulf (talk) 04:37, 11 March 2025 (UTC)
• :::yeah. hence my disagreement. if restored, i think it absolutely should go to afd unless someone could evaluate the sources here (because i'm still no expert on ball sport #701). then again, this was created and blanked early enough that just draftifying would be a better option consarn _{(prison phone) (crime record)} 10:48, 11 March 2025 (UTC)
• The 2026 season is not mentioned at the target, making it confusing / misleading for anybody who searches for the title and finds nothing of relevance there. But, as Thryduulf points out, this was previously an article. The fault lies with the person who redirected it to a location which had no information about it. I'm also leaning towards restoring the article. Hey man im josh (talk) 15:05, 10 March 2025 (UTC)
• Draftify it. Yes, it's too soon (which means that restoring it to mainspace is problematic) but the redirecting was also problematic due to there being no information on the 2026 edition at the target. Draftying it resolves both issues. -- Tavix ^(talk) 15:29, 10 March 2025 (UTC)

::Also fine with Keep per Blue Square Thing's additions. Thanks! -- Tavix ^(talk) 17:00, 12 March 2025 (UTC)

• Restore article and Draftify per above. No need to close this RfD and drag the article through another XfD if consensus is clear. — 🪫Volatile ^{📲T | ⌨️C} 04:02, 11 March 2025 (UTC)
• Draftify the article and delete the redirect. Vestrian24Bio 04:49, 11 March 2025 (UTC)
• : Keep per Blue Square Thing's additions. Vestrian24Bio 08:51, 17 March 2025 (UTC)
• The SA20 article now mentions the 2026, 2027 and 2028 seasons, all of which were created at the same time and redirected by me. I wasn't aware that they needed to be specifically mentioned. They are now. Up to y'all what you do with the non-articles that were created Blue Square Thing (talk) 16:25, 12 March 2025 (UTC)

:The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

• {{no redirect|1 = Nana (entertainer, born 2001) }} → :Wooah#Members  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: [{{fullurl:Nana (entertainer, born 2001)|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:main}}#Nana (entertainer, born 2001) closed as keep}}}} keep]/[{{fullurl:Nana (entertainer, born 2001)|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:main}}#Nana (entertainer, born 2001) closed as retarget}}}} retarget]/[{{fullurl:Nana (entertainer, born 2001)|action=delete&wpReason={{Urlencode:main}}#Nana (entertainer, born 2001) closed as delete}}&wpMovetalk=1}} delete] ] 

This list was redirected at AfD last 5 months. At the time, there was a "Members" section. Their request was the following:'' {{tq|The Nana (entertainer) and Nana (entertainer, born 2001) are 2 differents in South Korea.}} 112.207.123.170 (talk) 12:35, 10 March 2025 (UTC)

:Keep as the RfD rationale is incoherent without mentioning the why. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 14:09, 10 March 2025 (UTC)

• keep, if by default. i can guess what the nom might be trying to say... but it's at best not a deletion rationale (or a rationale at all), and nana is mentioned in the target (i wonder why). maybe an argument could be made for her birth date being unmentioned at the moment, but my brain is allergic to remembering things related to k-pop, so i can't help much consarn _{(prison phone) (crime record)} 14:25, 10 March 2025 (UTC)
• Keep. No rationale presented for why this should be deleted as a redirect. Steel1943 (talk) 20:15, 10 March 2025 (UTC)
• :No, was gonna say "delete per nom", see also the edit history and this afd discussion 112.207.123.170 (talk) 21:07, 10 March 2025 (UTC)
• ::ignoring potential copyvio issues, do we need two images cluttering up the next nom? consarn _{(prison phone) (crime record)} 23:05, 10 March 2025 (UTC)
• :::I don't understand the relevance of either the images or the AfD to this discussion? Thryduulf (talk) 23:41, 10 March 2025 (UTC)
• ::::2 Images were removed, sorry that all. 112.207.123.170 (talk) 00:34, 11 March 2025 (UTC)
• Keep, the target article has content about an entertainer named Nana who was (presumably) born in 2001. No reason to delete. Thryduulf (talk) 21:29, 10 March 2025 (UTC)

:The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

• {{no redirect|1 = Tighten }} → :Megamind#Cast  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: [{{fullurl:Tighten|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:main}}#Tighten closed as keep}}}} keep]/[{{fullurl:Tighten|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:main}}#Tighten closed as retarget}}}} retarget]/[{{fullurl:Tighten|action=delete&wpReason={{Urlencode:main}}#Tighten closed as delete}}&wpMovetalk=1}} delete] ] 

closed twice before with no consensus (first time, second time), with the recommendation of waiting at least 2 months to nom again. thus, to celebrate the 69rd day of the year (nice), it's time to nom again. with that preamble aside... that's a word with seemingly no fitting enough target and not much to work with for a dab, though an argument could be made for this resident incel being the primary topic. what do? consarn _{(prison phone) (crime record)} 12:08, 10 March 2025 (UTC)

:notes:

:* tighten (character) is a redirect that exists, but it likely doesn't matter since it has that juicy disambiguator

:* yes, it's tighten. megamind tried to name him titan, but he's canonically a dumb stupid bad at writing doofus who thinks the triangle doesn't go in the square hole, so the discussion about whether or not that is his funny name is at best an irrelevant misconception

:not important notes, but notes nonetheless consarn _{(prison phone) (crime record)} 12:15, 10 March 2025 (UTC)

: {{tqb|Delete Redirecting a dictionary word to the misspelling of a film character's name is downright wrong and astonishing. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 00:29, 28 September 2024 (UTC)}} * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 23:51, 10 March 2025 (UTC)

::again, it's not a misspelling of a character's name, it's a mishearing, which is itself canon because hal is the kind of person who thinks the possessive form of "it" has an apostrophe

::also what happened with your reply's formatting, holy fr*ck consarn _{(prison phone) (crime record)} 10:50, 11 March 2025 (UTC)

:::oh wait now i got it, should have realized that it was a quote. whoops consarn _{(prison phone) (crime record)} 14:31, 11 March 2025 (UTC)

• Disagree that there is no fitting enough target. If that was the case we wouldn't have Tighten (character) redirecting to the same target. If someone was looking for the dictionary meaning of the word, Wikipedia is not the place. The hatnote at the current target (added after the previous RfD) is also quite silly, but should alleviate any "confusion". Jay 💬 20:22, 18 March 2025 (UTC)
• Keep. Was extensively discussed at the previous RFDs and nothing has changed. It's one of the official names of the main villainous character, there's nothing called "Tighten" at the DAB, we should not soft retarget to Wiktionary when we have encyclopedic coverage here, and now there's a hatnote for those who might be confused. -- Patar knight - ^chat/_{contributions} 02:03, 19 March 2025 (UTC)
• Keep: Tight is a DAB page and doesn't seem like the best target. Tightening doesn't exist. There is a character named Tighten that we have some content about, so might as well. Schützenpanzer (Talk) 01:22, 31 March 2025 (UTC)
• Weak delete since I'm a bit tired of this being renominated, but I really don't want this to be closed to "keep" per my comment in one of the previous discussions. Let's leave this as "no consensus" and move on... Steel1943 (talk) 03:14, 5 April 2025 (UTC)
• Keep per Patar Knight and Consarn. Thryduulf (talk) 10:54, 5 April 2025 (UTC)

:The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

• {{no redirect|1 = Crusader 1865 ship }} → :Crusader (1865 ship)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: [{{fullurl:Crusader 1865 ship|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:main}}#Crusader 1865 ship closed as keep}}}} keep]/[{{fullurl:Crusader 1865 ship|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:main}}#Crusader 1865 ship closed as retarget}}}} retarget]/[{{fullurl:Crusader 1865 ship|action=delete&wpReason={{Urlencode:main}}#Crusader 1865 ship closed as delete}}&wpMovetalk=1}} delete] ] 

Per prior consensus (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2019_May_7#Weird_Al_Yankovic and that's only ONE rfd), redirects with double single apostrophes in a row should be deleted to avoid technical problems. User:Someone-123-321 (I contribute, Talk page so SineBot will shut up) 11:12, 10 March 2025 (UTC)

: Support - The only reason the redirect exists is because someone created the article like that and I moved it to its proper title. Llammakey (talk) 11:20, 10 March 2025 (UTC)

• Delete. Should never have been created at this title by NealeWellington, given that the creator bypassed a title pattern (2+ consecutive apostrophes) that has been blocked by the title creation blacklist ... [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=MediaWiki:Titleblacklist&diff=prev&oldid=638453053 since 2014]. (2014 discussion.) Steel1943 (talk) 20:24, 10 March 2025 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. --Schützenpanzer (Talk) 17:44, 11 March 2025 (UTC)

:The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

• {{no redirect|1 = MP: }} → :Main Page  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: [{{fullurl:MP:|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:main}}#MP: closed as keep}}}} keep]/[{{fullurl:MP:|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:main}}#MP: closed as retarget}}}} retarget]/[{{fullurl:MP:|action=delete&wpReason={{Urlencode:main}}#MP: closed as delete}}&wpMovetalk=1}} delete] ]
• {{no redirect|1 = MP:TFP }} → :Main Page  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: [{{fullurl:MP:TFP|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:main}}#MP:TFP closed as keep}}}} keep]/[{{fullurl:MP:TFP|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:main}}#MP:TFP closed as retarget}}}} retarget]/[{{fullurl:MP:TFP|action=delete&wpReason={{Urlencode:main}}#MP:TFP closed as delete}}&wpMovetalk=1}} delete] ]
• {{no redirect|1 = MP:WSP }} → :Main Page  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: [{{fullurl:MP:WSP|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:main}}#MP:WSP closed as keep}}}} keep]/[{{fullurl:MP:WSP|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:main}}#MP:WSP closed as retarget}}}} retarget]/[{{fullurl:MP:WSP|action=delete&wpReason={{Urlencode:main}}#MP:WSP closed as delete}}&wpMovetalk=1}} delete] ]
• {{no redirect|1 = MP:OTD }} → :Main Page  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: [{{fullurl:MP:OTD|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:main}}#MP:OTD closed as keep}}}} keep]/[{{fullurl:MP:OTD|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:main}}#MP:OTD closed as retarget}}}} retarget]/[{{fullurl:MP:OTD|action=delete&wpReason={{Urlencode:main}}#MP:OTD closed as delete}}&wpMovetalk=1}} delete] ]
• {{no redirect|1 = MP:TOP }} → :Main Page  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: [{{fullurl:MP:TOP|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:main}}#MP:TOP closed as keep}}}} keep]/[{{fullurl:MP:TOP|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:main}}#MP:TOP closed as retarget}}}} retarget]/[{{fullurl:MP:TOP|action=delete&wpReason={{Urlencode:main}}#MP:TOP closed as delete}}&wpMovetalk=1}} delete] ]
• {{no redirect|1 = MP:DYK }} → :Main Page  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: [{{fullurl:MP:DYK|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:main}}#MP:DYK closed as keep}}}} keep]/[{{fullurl:MP:DYK|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:main}}#MP:DYK closed as retarget}}}} retarget]/[{{fullurl:MP:DYK|action=delete&wpReason={{Urlencode:main}}#MP:DYK closed as delete}}&wpMovetalk=1}} delete] ]

This seems like an inappropiate attempt at a WP:PNS that didn't go far.

Internal links range from 4-3 (for MP:) all the way to 0 (for MP:DYK), so it's not like any links will break from deleting these redirects.

I should note that these pages (other than DYK, which was a discovery made by me just now) were previously RFD'd as keep ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2010_December_19#MP: ) but consensus changes. User:Someone-123-321 (I contribute, Talk page so SineBot will shut up) 10:22, 10 March 2025 (UTC)

:Keep all. The MP: prefix is mentioned in WP:SC#Pseudo-namespaces as an explicitly allowed case. People in the previous RfD said they find these redirects useful and all of them still get views so there are some editors that still do. And finally, there are some links that don't show up in Special:WhatLinksHere such as links in edit summaries. We can't know for certain whether deleting will break any links or not. Nickps (talk) 23:57, 10 March 2025 (UTC)

• Keep all per Nickps. Explicitly allowed for these usecases and unambiguous. -- Patar knight - ^chat/_{contributions} 08:06, 17 March 2025 (UTC)

:The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

• {{no redirect|1 = Bornean }} → :Borean languages  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: [{{fullurl:Bornean|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:main}}#Bornean closed as keep}}}} keep]/[{{fullurl:Bornean|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:main}}#Bornean closed as retarget}}}} retarget]/[{{fullurl:Bornean|action=delete&wpReason={{Urlencode:main}}#Bornean closed as delete}}&wpMovetalk=1}} delete] ] 

Retarget to Borneo; term is not just a typo of "Borean", it is an established term used to refer to something as [https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/Bornean belonging to/from the island of Borneo] Anthropophoca (talk) 03:40, 10 March 2025 (UTC)

• Retarget to Borneo per nom. This feels like it could have been done boldly (the redirect used to point to Borneo until 2020 when it was retargeted by Kypioys sx) Duckmather (talk) 04:51, 10 March 2025 (UTC)
• Retarget to Borneo per nom. Enix150 (talk) 21:41, 10 March 2025 (UTC)

:The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).