Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/ImpuMozhi
class="messagebox"
| style="text-align: center" | If you are creating a new request about this user, please add it to the top of the page, above this notice. Don't forget to add |
=== ImpuMozhi ===
- {{checkuser|ImpuMozhi}}
- {{checkuser|Muhammad al-Islami}}
- {{checkuser|Scabbers the Rat}}
- {{checkuser|Telex}}
Vandalizing pages of rajput kings by adding derogatory rajput chief category and also changing ruling clans of india category. Jujinho 14:30, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
- Jujinho is one of more than 50 vandal sockpuppets created by one permabanned user with an Arbcom judgment against him; see :Category:Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of Shivraj Singh / DPSingh for a partial listing. The complaint above is not to be taken seriously, but if Checkuser has time, please look into these 50 accounts (importantly User:Shivraj Singh and User:DPSingh) and publish a list of editors using the same IP. That may well prove useful. Regards, ImpuMozhi 14:38, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
- Small comment: Jujinho left this message in User_talk:Muhammad al-Islami, which says Suar/Sockpuppet back off. the first word being the Hindi/Indian term for a pig. I guess this checkuser is really a call for arbitration/mediation. --Ragib 15:11, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
{{Clerk-Note}} see also Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Rajput#DPSingh banned. If you wish to file a request for checkuser against possible sockpuppets of DPSingh, please add the information to the top of Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/DPSingh and then list the page here. Thatcher131 15:44, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
:Comment: A classical Checkuser against Jujinho and his earlier Rajput incarnations will hardly be necessary as the identity is obvious. For the mass-vandalism problem caused by this user, see recent AN posting by Dbachmann here [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard&diff=prev&oldid=61018157]. The above request by Jujinho is frivolous and should be speedily closed/declined/deleted/whatever, as illegitimate activity of a permabanned user (possibly Speedy G5). The editors mentioned are simply doing the hard work of mass-reverting his daily disruptions. Fut.Perf. ☼ 16:01, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
::There's no speedy procedure for checkuser requests. This will have to wait until one of the checkuser admins rules on it. Thatcher131 16:12, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
{{Declined}}. No evidence of policy violation presented. Mackensen (talk) 17:10, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.