Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2022 October 24#Template:Rda/preload

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 07:19, 31 October 2022 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Country data Odùduwà}}

No transclusions, incoming links, documentation, or categories. This is a simple File: call, not a proper country data template. There does not appear to be a main article for this possible proposed country, so there is nowhere to link to. Delete until it is needed. The flag image is still available for use in articles. – Jonesey95 (talk) 15:54, 17 October 2022 (UTC)

• Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 22:49, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
• Leaning toward keep. Seems a bit legendary, however strongly so. Tied to Yorubaland as well as Benin, Nigeria and Togo in West Africa. I've updated the page to the correct format. If kept, the /doc page can be created to properly house the categories. P.I. Ellsworth , ed. ^put'r there 08:22, 19 October 2022 (UTC)

:

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:51, 24 October 2022 (UTC)

• Delete The above keep argument is not convincing; it falls prey to my usual "if this were useful, someone would have used it already" counterargument as with all attempts to save unused templates brought here. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 01:09, 25 October 2022 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete the M2 template Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 13:34, 4 November 2022 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|M2|module=|type=merge}}
• {{Tfd links|Module link|module=|type=merge}}

Propose merging Template:M2 with Template:Module link.

Seems to be an accidental duplicate of Template:Module link which only supports one parameter. Parameters look compatible for a redirect there. User:GKFX^talk 22:24, 24 October 2022 (UTC)

• Merge per nom. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 01:09, 25 October 2022 (UTC)
• Replace and delete This template is virtually unused and has a cryptic name. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 23:22, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
• Replace and delete per LaundryPizza. --Izno (talk) 03:59, 1 November 2022 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 13:39, 27 October 2022 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|RE-NRW style}}
• {{Tfd links|RE-NRW color}}
• {{Tfd links|RE-NRW lines}}
• {{Tfd links|RE-NRW stations}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/RE-NRW left/5}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/RE-NRW left/8}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/RE-NRW left/15}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/RE-NRW right/5}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/RE-NRW right/8}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/RE-NRW right/15}}

replaced by Module:Adjacent stations/DB Regio NRW Frietjes (talk) 15:34, 24 October 2022 (UTC)

• Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 18:03, 24 October 2022 (UTC)
• Delete JackPotte (talk) 19:32, 24 October 2022 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:47, 31 October 2022 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|October 2022 Conservative Party leadership election}}

Not enough links to justify a template. Neither Boris or Penny Mordaunt actually contested an election, and so this is an unnecessary template which is pointless WP:RECENTISM Joseph2302 (talk) 13:09, 24 October 2022 (UTC)

• Delete per nom, not enough to put in here – filelakeshoe (t / c) 🐱 13:18, 24 October 2022 (UTC)
• delete per nom, excessive navboxing. Frietjes (talk) 15:36, 24 October 2022 (UTC)
• Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 18:03, 24 October 2022 (UTC)
• Delete and Comment - As noted above there is little that can be put here. Even including Boris Johnson as one of the "Withdrew before first ballot" as is currently the case is problematic as, as the October 2022 Conservative Party leadership election does not class him as this (technically he never said he was running unlike Penny Mordaunt and in the past only declared candidates who have withdrawn have been included in these templates eg he is not included in Template:2016 Conservative Party leadership election). As an aside I wonder if a good way forward would be for this contest to also be covered at what is currently Template:July–September 2022 Conservative Party leadership election if that was slightly edited and renamed to "2022 Conservative Party leadership elections"? Dunarc (talk) 20:10, 24 October 2022 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Hildeoc (talk) 10:31, 26 October 2022 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:48, 31 October 2022 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Big Bang Entertainments}}

Fails WP:TG and WP:NAV-WITHIN, merely used for decorative purpose with only four entries. Main article was deleted via AFD, so it could also serve to bypass AFD. 2409:4073:498:BF22:E944:508B:B77F:A50D (talk) 13:08, 24 October 2022 (UTC)

• Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 18:04, 24 October 2022 (UTC)
• Delete as per nom. Joseph2302 (talk) 13:59, 27 October 2022 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G8 by {{admin|Izno}} AnomieBOT⚡ 09:08, 31 October 2022 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Editnotices/Page/Benjamin Mendy}}
• {{Tfd links|Editnotices/Page/Gylfi Sigurðsson}}
• {{Tfd links|Editnotices/Page/Ryan Giggs}}

Only content of the page is transclusion of {{tl|sub judice}}, which was deleted per this TFD. This editnotice should be deleted for the same reasons stated in the TFD. ಮಲ್ನಾಡಾಚ್ ಕೊಂಕ್ಣೊ (talk) 12:25, 24 October 2022 (UTC)

• Comment: I have blanked these pages. Can they be speedy deleted now, or do we have to go through this formal process? – Jonesey95 (talk) 16:05, 24 October 2022 (UTC)
• Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 18:03, 24 October 2022 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 01:09, 25 October 2022 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was move to userspace. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 15:51, 6 November 2022 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Rda/preload}}

Template:Please leave this line alone (Rda) which is used by Template:Rda/preload was deleted in 2019 and nobody complained. [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?search=insource%3A%2F%5BrR%5Dd%5Bca%5D%28%252F%7C%5C%2F%29preload%2F&title=Special:Search&profile=advanced&fulltext=1&ns0=1&ns1=1&ns2=1&ns3=1&ns4=1&ns5=1&ns6=1&ns7=1&ns8=1&ns9=1&ns10=1&ns11=1&ns12=1&ns13=1&ns14=1&ns15=1&ns100=1&ns101=1&ns118=1&ns119=1&ns710=1&ns711=1&ns828=1&ns829=1&ns2300=1&ns2301=1&ns2302=1&ns2303=1 insource search] shows that nobody uses or tries to use preloads of {{tl|Rda}} or its new name {{tl|Rdc}}. Propose deleting Template:Rda/preload. —⁠andrybak (talk) 20:24, 9 October 2022 (UTC)

:This is needed by Template:Rdc, which I [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Search&limit=500&offset=0&ns0=1&ns1=1&ns2=1&ns3=1&ns4=1&ns5=1&ns6=1&ns7=1&ns8=1&ns9=1&ns10=1&ns11=1&ns12=1&ns13=1&ns14=1&ns15=1&ns100=1&ns101=1&ns118=1&ns119=1&ns710=1&ns711=1&ns828=1&ns829=1&ns2300=1&ns2301=1&ns2302=1&ns2303=1&search=%22could+you+please+restore+it%22+launchballer use] whenever I request deleted content (although I haven't actually needed to for a very long time, and clearly not since Template:Please leave this line alone (Rda) was deleted). Certainly if this is kept it probably ought to be moved to Template:Rdc/preload, though I'm on the fence as to whether it should be or not.--Launchballer 21:19, 9 October 2022 (UTC)

:: Perhaps, the template and its preload should be userfied then? —⁠andrybak (talk) 22:48, 9 October 2022 (UTC)

:

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:43, 16 October 2022 (UTC)

:

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 03:14, 24 October 2022 (UTC)

• Userfy the entire batch, then, as a personal-user template which seems to be used rarely enough it should not clog up template namespace. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 01:09, 25 October 2022 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 03:21, 31 October 2022 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Asa Akira}}

Nothing directly related to the subject. Mainly filmography which isn't needed for a navbox as it's nothing defining. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 01:55, 24 October 2022 (UTC)

• Delete. A performer-by-performance navbox, almost completely redundant with the main article's contents. The only navigation was the eponymous article and a now-deleted awards and nominations page. The main subject is only significantly covered in the Asa Akira article. The remaining blue links that even mention the main subject at all are just lists of actors/guest stars, where navigation would carry undue weight. • Gene93k (talk) 07:14, 24 October 2022 (UTC)
• Delete for reasons stated above. Trivialist (talk) 09:58, 24 October 2022 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 12:52, 28 October 2022 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Deltoidal table}}

Unused after substitution and significant modification of its one remaining use, per discussion at Talk:Kite (geometry)/GA1. —David Eppstein (talk) 00:25, 24 October 2022 (UTC)

• Userfy if the creator wants it, otherwise delete. Ovinus (talk) 01:16, 24 October 2022 (UTC)
• I moved it to a user page. Tom Ruen (talk) 09:44, 24 October 2022 (UTC)
• speedy delete the cross-namespace redirect, now moved to userspace. Frietjes (talk) 14:11, 24 October 2022 (UTC)
• Delete Template space is no longer needed as now it's moved to the userspace of the creator. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 18:04, 24 October 2022 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).