Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Politics#Call for fellow drafters

{{User:MiszaBot/config

|archiveheader = {{talk archive navigation}}

|maxarchivesize = 100K

|counter = 48

|minthreadsleft = 2

|minthreadstoarchive = 1

|algo = old(30d)

|archive = Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Politics/Archive %(counter)d

}}

{{talk header|WT:PLT|WT:POLITICS|wp=yes}}

{{messagebox|text=Welcome to the talk space of WikiProject Politics. In this area you can find discussions, notices, requests of many articles that in some way deals with the practice of politics. If you would like to discuss, place a notice about, or if you have a request about, an article within the scope of this project, please do include it here. If you have an interest in politics and would like to contribute, please add your name to the list of participants on the project page.}}

{{WikiProject banner shell|

{{WikiProject Politics}}

}}

{{User:HBC Archive Indexerbot/OptIn |target=/Archive index |mask=/Archive <#> |leading_zeros=0 |indexhere=yes}}

{{Wikipedia:WikiProject Politics/Navigation}}

Requested move at [[Talk:The Base (hate group)#Requested move 7 May 2025]]

File:Information.svg There is a requested move discussion at Talk:The Base (hate group)#Requested move 7 May 2025 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. ASUKITE 15:31, 16 May 2025 (UTC)

NPOL and ROUTINE

Please consider offering feedback in the discussion Wikipedia:Notability (people)#Possible issue with standard interpretation of NPOL, as I believe it is an opportunity to more fully address potential conflicts over notability determinations for failed candidates. ~ Pbritti (talk) 01:45, 19 May 2025 (UTC)

Good article reassessment for [[Tiberius]]

Tiberius has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 19:01, 19 May 2025 (UTC)

Good article reassessment for [[Non-constituency Member of Parliament]]

Non-constituency Member of Parliament has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 15:54, 25 May 2025 (UTC)

Good article reassessment for [[Save Our Children]]

Save Our Children has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 16:00, 25 May 2025 (UTC)

[[:Donald Trump]] has an [[WP:RFC|RfC]]

:Donald Trump has an RfC for possible consensus. A discussion is taking place. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. Emiya1980 (talk) 21:27, 25 May 2025 (UTC)

ALDE as a "transnational alliance"

Hi everyone,

I would like some community feedback on the continued relevance of the article on Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe as a transnational political alliance -- note that this is different from the article on ALDE as a European political party or as a political group of the European Parliament, or as a political group of PACE, or in the Committee of the Regions.

The page is not really developed and has not changed much in a while. Meanwhile, I am not really sure that this "alliance" between ALDE Party and the EDP is still a thing, and the EDP's website does not seem to mention it at all. The number of seats in the EP is also wrong and the website is actually that of ALDE Party. At the very least, if we are to keep this page, it should probably be in the past tense. What do you think? Julius Schwarz (talk) 08:28, 28 May 2025 (UTC)

:Any input, anyone? If not, I would really move ahead and change this to the past tense. Julius Schwarz (talk) 07:44, 9 June 2025 (UTC)

Good article reassessment for [[Flavian dynasty]]

Flavian dynasty has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 00:53, 29 May 2025 (UTC)

[[Talk:Jewish supremacy]]

There is some discussion on Talk:Jewish supremacy about changing the article "Jewish supremacy" into a dab page. Please participate. The Banner talk 07:31, 31 May 2025 (UTC)

[[Jackie Norris]]

I cleaned up the worst of this. This was [https://en.m.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Jackie_Norris&diff=prev&oldid=1290212968 the before]. Apparently she (or one of her employees) put in a bunch of weasel words and spam links. She is a potential candidate for the 2026 United States Senate election in Iowa. Can somebody further clean up this article? Bearian (talk) 02:43, 1 June 2025 (UTC)

Moe Berg at FAR

I have nominated Moe Berg for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" in regards to the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Z1720 (talk) 14:14, 8 June 2025 (UTC)

"[[Edison Research]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]

30x30px

The redirect [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Edison_Research&redirect=no Edison Research] has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at {{section link|Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 June 8#Edison Research}} until a consensus is reached. --MYCETEAE 🍄‍🟫—talk 14:22, 9 June 2025 (UTC)

[[Budget crisis]]

Could somebody please source this with reliable sources? You could earn points at Wikipedia:WikiProject Unreferenced articles/Backlog drives/June 2025. Bearian (talk) 01:41, 11 June 2025 (UTC)

Requested move at [[Talk:List of leaders of the opposition in the Bihar Legislative Assembly#Requested move 28 May 2025]]

File:Information.svg There is a requested move discussion at Talk:List of leaders of the opposition in the Bihar Legislative Assembly#Requested move 28 May 2025 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Reading Beans, Duke of Rivia 06:40, 12 June 2025 (UTC)

[[:Template:Infobox government cabinet]] has an [[WP:RFC|RfC]]

:Template:Infobox government cabinet has an RfC for possible consensus. A discussion is taking place. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. Impru20talk 09:57, 13 June 2025 (UTC)