Wikipedia:Help desk

Hello, can I use same article/interview of actor as reference link, confirming he indeed was in several works in his/her wikipedia article and add it as ref link at several works at his/her Wikipage?

Or I need to use several different reference links?

It is just this actor is supportive one and don't have many reliable sources. Илона И (talk) 22:46, 19 May 2025 (UTC)

:{{ping|Илона И}} As a rule, credits do not need a citation barring an uncredited or pseudonymous appearance; the credits listing itself would instantly verify their participation. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v ^{threads critiques} 22:49, 19 May 2025 (UTC)

::@Jéské Couriano so roles of actor doesn't need reference links?

::I thought it needed bcs in list of roles someone put tag Citation needed.

:::Or we need to add this actor in Cast list of this work at Wiki and put reference link here? Илона И 23:14, 19 May 2025 (UTC)

: Ranjani Shettar

Reference help requested.

Thanks, Herohcreatives (talk) 21:18, 20 May 2025 (UTC)

I am not quite clear on what you said, can you narrow it down to the edit you are talking about?

:In [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AHelp_desk&diff=1291380866&oldid=1291377085 your edit above], Herohcreatives, you have provided a link to an edit that you made. But presumably your intention wasn't to ask about the meaning of what you wrote. What are you asking about? -- Hoary (talk) 05:35, 21 May 2025 (UTC)

::I was asking for the specific link, but I have figured it out. Please check it out if I have made the right correction. Thanks for your keen observation Herohcreatives (talk) 15:27, 22 May 2025 (UTC)

Hi all, I want to ask a question. Is there any way to fetch both stable and preview releases from Wikidata using {{tl|wikidata}}. There is an example on the {{tl|infobox software}} documentation, but probably doesn't work. Karacehennem (talk) 12:42, 21 May 2025 (UTC)

:In the example at {{tl|Infobox software}} the wikidata template in the parameter latest preview version is set to {{tlx|wikidata|property|preferred|references|edit|Q8038|P348|P548=Q51930650}}, which as there is no pre-release version set to the preferred rank on the wikidata item, nothing shows up. So long as the wikidata item is correct (and you're fetching the right stuff), the template should work Trim02 (talk) 13:26, 21 May 2025 (UTC)

My draft Draft:Salish Matter has been declined. If you want to, please help me edit my Wikipedia. Rafaelthegreat (talk) 16:37, 21 May 2025 (UTC)

:This one is going nowhere as it is basically a promo piece for a non-notable person. Before asking for help here, please read Your first article.--♦IanMacM♦ ^{(talk to me)} 16:43, 21 May 2025 (UTC)

:Hello, @Rafaelthegreat. A Wikipedia article should be a neutral summary of what people wholly unconnected with the subject have chosen to publish about the subject in reliable publications, and very little else. Unless you can find several sources which meet those criteria, there cannot be an article. ColinFine (talk) 20:20, 21 May 2025 (UTC)

Hi all! I was trying to make a page for Ohio State Rep. Karen Brownlee (Ohio politician), but "Karen Brownlee" redirected to another politician with the same spelling Karin Brownlee. I ended up adding a disambiguation page here, but Im not sure if I did it correctly. Could someone look over it for me?

Thank you! :) Aricds (talk) 05:38, 22 May 2025 (UTC)

:Looks fine to me. CMD (talk) 06:05, 22 May 2025 (UTC)

::Thank you! Aricds (talk) 06:09, 22 May 2025 (UTC)

:Unnecessarily complex, in my [adjective] opinion. Instead, "Karen Brownlee" could be about Karen Brownlee; "Karin Brownlee" could be about Karin Brownlee; each article could have a hatnote pointing out the existence of the other. (Cf Morris Bishop and Maurice Bishop.) -- Hoary (talk) 06:50, 22 May 2025 (UTC)

Hi,

There is a company page https://w.wiki/EFep which was in English earlier. Someone changed the language of this page to Hindi.

Can someone help how I can change it back to English as the page belong to a MNC and should be in English Love.eclerx (talk) 06:43, 22 May 2025 (UTC)

:Is this a request for help somewhere in en.wikipedia.org, Love.eclerx? If so, please rephrase it. (And if not, you're asking at the wrong place.) -- Hoary (talk) 06:55, 22 May 2025 (UTC)

::@Hoary The page actually belong to en.wikipedia.org but someone changed the language to Hindi and now it is showing content in Hindi language. I am trying to move it back to English.

::So I need help in en.wikipedia.org Love.eclerx (talk) 06:59, 22 May 2025 (UTC)

:::@Love.eclerx: The url points to hi.wikipedia.org, so the page is on the Hindi Wikipedia. The article on the Hindi Wikipedia was a translation of the article EClerx (which was deleted on 4 May 2025) from this Wikipedia (the English Wikipedia). Trim02 (talk) 07:11, 22 May 2025 (UTC)

::::Yes @Trim02 That's the concern. Someone translated the article in Hindi and deleted the English version.

::::Any wayout to restore the english versions? Love.eclerx (talk) 07:30, 22 May 2025 (UTC)

:::::Eclerx and EClerx have been repeatedly deleted for nearly 20 years, twice by discussion 1, 2. A version was restored to userspace for improvement but no improvement has taken place. It looks nowhere near to meeting the requirements of WP:NORG and would probably be deleted again if it were to appear in mainspace. Cabayi (talk) 08:00, 22 May 2025 (UTC)

::::::Wikipedia languages are edited independently. The English Wikipedia has no control over the Hindi Wikipedia and it doesn't affect us if they once translated an English language. I don't know their article requirements and it doesn't matter to us. PrimeHunter (talk) 11:40, 22 May 2025 (UTC)

{{atop|1=Additional advice has been given at WP:COIN#Sunil Dutt. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 15:27, 24 May 2025 (UTC)}}

I have corrected and arranged all the information for actor-politician Sunil Dutt's page. Please check it. Moreover, please let me know if it is verified or not because the maintenance tag was attached since March 2025 plus, some editors disturb the page by removing references or do some modifications. Gooshh (talk) 17:21, 22 May 2025 (UTC)

:A lot of your edits seem dedicated to puffing up his significance and adding unreliable sources. Those editors, by and large, have been improving it from your less impartial versions. --Orange Mike | Talk 17:51, 22 May 2025 (UTC)

{{abot}}

Hi, help desk regulars! Hope you're doing well. I am kindly asking for more eyes on {{la|Miss Star International}}, please. An editor—who has stated they are the executive director on the article talk and their user talk—has restored blatantly promotional language to the article. I do not know if my schedule for the foreseeable future leaves me enough time to fix the article, issue a second warning, walk them through proper procedure, and answer any questions. I know we are all volunteers here, so I greatly appreciate whatever help you give. Happy editing! Rotideypoc41352 (talk · contribs) 18:23, 22 May 2025 (UTC)

: Reverted, blocked them as spam-only. I think we're done here. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 18:29, 22 May 2025 (UTC)

:In future, you may make such reports at WP:COIN - but note the requirements for prior discussion and notification at the top of that page. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 15:16, 23 May 2025 (UTC)

: Re: What a MESS Wikipedia's Language Options is in...! Who do I "Report" it to & WHAT CAN BE DONE about REMEDYING it?

As a multi-language speaker, I've reently accessed the Wiki page at the following linh [for the insect: weevil]: Weevil & at that page's more upper right-hand side saw the Drop-Menu button listing 49 languages. I've clicked on it & was HORRIFIED [in a state of DISBELIED, literally!] at what appeared to me to be a COMPLETE CHAOS & state of GEOGRAPHICAL IGNORANCE. AK63 (talk) 09:49, 23 May 2025 (UTC)

:{{ping|AK63}} I don't know what you are unhappy with but some languages are included in multiple regions where they are common in some of the region. It may for example seem odd that Chinese is listed under America but it's also under Asia. PrimeHunter (talk) 10:20, 23 May 2025 (UTC)

:{{ping|AK63}} I'm not sure what disturbs you about the available languages, it seems to me like maybe you have the wrong idea about the selection of foreign languages for a given article, let me try at an explanation.

:Most people using English wikipedia (enwiki) have English as the language they're most familiar with. However, for any given article on enwiki, there may be corresponding versions of that article on other language wikis. These articles are generally independent (though in some cases, the text may have been computer-translated).

:As long as you're on enwiki, your navigation tools (e.g. search) will only search those articles that exist on enwiki. If for some reason you're curious how it shows up on (for instance) German Wikipedia (dewiki), and if the article exists on dewiki, you are free to look at that or however many other foreign-language versions exist. If you don't know German and your browser supports machine translation to your preferred language, that's your choice.

:The much greater value of having articles in other languages is when a person using enwiki wants to access an article that does not exist on enwiki but does exist in some other language, then (if an interlanguage wikilink has been provided), you can access that Wikipedia article in that other language. If it's a language you're familiar with, great! If not, you can use your browser's machine translation to view it. In effect, you have access to many articles that aren't available on enwiki thanks to someone having provided an interlanguage link to an article that's not available on enwiki. (You can also search for these other-language articles manually, but you wouldn't automatically know that the article even existed on another language wiki.) Fabrickator (talk) 07:23, 25 May 2025 (UTC)

I'm having trouble with two editors who are obstructing my ability to edit a page, forcing extremely long discussions, with no evidence of compromising.

Whenever I make an edit, based on our months-long discussion, in an effort to advance the WP:BRD cycle, my edits are reverted with minimal discussion and often weeks between responses.

here's the page: Nerdeen_Kiswani (yeesh, this I/P conflict, amiright?)

I know this is a controversial topic, so I'm trying to assume good faith, but it's been several months without any forward progress. The page is not popular enough to attract attention from other editors.

I've been a wikipedian for 20 years, but I'm new to controversy, so I'm not totally sure how to handle this.

Any advice would be appreciated! DuckOfOrange (talk) 19:43, 23 May 2025 (UTC)

:@Iamnotanorange~enwiki I'm not sure that nominating the article for deletion is the correct way forward but since you have done so this will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Nerdeen_Kiswani. A more normal way to handle content disputes via talk pages is described at WP:DR. Mike Turnbull (talk) 19:52, 23 May 2025 (UTC)

::The nomination for deletion is separate from the dispute and obstructive editing. I've been re-thinking the notoriety of the subject and whether it meets our standards.

::I'll pursue the WP:DR separately, thank you. DuckOfOrange (talk) 19:56, 23 May 2025 (UTC)

:Note prior discussion at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement/Archive349#Iamnotanorange~enwiki. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 15:25, 24 May 2025 (UTC)

Hello! magazine has turned up as a source for the article Royal Family Order of Charles III and there is uncertainty as to whether it is reliable. Is it reliable and cited, at least on public appearances of the British Royal Family? J S Ayer (talk) 04:34, 24 May 2025 (UTC)

:Probably not, but it's not clear. It only seems to have been discussed once at WP:RSN, five years ago: WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 267#Hello! Magazine. ColinFine (talk) 09:29, 24 May 2025 (UTC)

:Hello! is a tabloid gossip magazine. I can think of few circumstances where it would even need consideration as a source. Why does an article on Royal Orders (formally-bestowed honours within the British honours system) need to cite such a source? What specific text is it being cited to support? AndyTheGrump (talk) 11:20, 24 May 2025 (UTC)

:@J S Ayer The article Royal family orders of the United Kingdom certainly needs more sources/citations but surely there must be better ones than Hello! (magazine)? The "!" is a sort of give-away. Mike Turnbull (talk) 11:35, 24 May 2025 (UTC)

:The order is unofficial, and the needed citation would be a photograph of Queen Camilla wearing it. J S Ayer (talk) 00:35, 25 May 2025 (UTC)

::It is rarely appropriate to cite a photograph. AndyTheGrump (talk) 01:38, 25 May 2025 (UTC)

: Alan Pell Crawford

I looked up the author who received a laudatory reference added to Huck's Defeat in January:

"A fine retelling of this battle is Crawford, Alan Pell (2024). This Fierce People: The Untold Story of America's Revolutionary War in the South."

The article about that author, Alan Pell Crawford, struck me as promotional so I looked at some of the article's statistics. It was created on 2010 January 5 by "Greaterric". Three users accounted for more than 80% of the characters in the article.

Account User:Greaterric was also created on 2010 January 5. There were 11 edits via this account, all on Alan Pell Crawford. The account hasn't been used since 2010 January 22.

Account User:Jeffarazzi was created on 2019 May 10 and made major changes to Alan Pell Crawford the same day. That seems to be the only edit made from that account.

Account User:Shizshunt was created on 2024 June 25 and subsequently made 18 edits, all on July 3 and none since. Of those, 10 edits were on Alan Pell Crawford and the remainder on Mickey Bergman and Margalit Fox.

There are no user pages for Jeffarazzi or Shizshunt. Greaterric directs to Alan Pell Crawford !

I am far from expert in the workings of Wikipedia so I'm just posting something which seems curious to me and asking if any action is needed.

Humpster (talk) 05:25, 24 May 2025 (UTC)

:I've removed that promotional reference. It's not clear that it was actually being used as a ref, or that it was needed in the lead. The same user also added the book as further reading, so it is still mentioned in the article. As for the throwaway accounts, there's not much to be done except to check their input for WP:POV and sourcing.

:user:Greaterric redirects to the article because the user incorrectly drafted the article there before moving it to article space. I will tag it for deletion. Meters (talk) 05:45, 24 May 2025 (UTC)

:In future, you can make such reports at WP:COIN, but note the requirements stated there for prior discussion, and notifying those involved (which should also be done when reporting here). Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 15:18, 24 May 2025 (UTC)

I have been trying to get the hold of freely licensed files on the Wikipedia Commons but it seems like they all get deleted due to not being a freely-licensed file (even though the website where I get them from says it can be used on web pages).

I have a new photo from Flickr I would like to upload but fear I will run into the same issue.

The file was originally all rights reserved to the owner.

I contacted the owner of the photo who has given me permission via Flickr to use his file and said he would not mind sending Wikipedia an email giving me permission to use his file.

He also changed the license of the photo to a more relaxed one.

How could I use this file without it being deleted?

https://www.flickr.com/photos/iimacadam/52396710801/in/dateposted/

Thank you all! NightExplorer96 (talk) 16:07, 24 May 2025 (UTC)

:@NightExplorer96 Questions about Commons should be directed to Commons. Some useful links: COM:FAQ, COM:License. That said, the image you linked is under cc by-nc-nd which is forbidden on Commons Trim02 (talk) 16:28, 24 May 2025 (UTC)

::Okay. I had the picture owner change the license to a sharealike license.

::Would it be appropriate now? :)

::It is now this:

::- Attribution-ShareAlike 2.0 Generic

::Thank you for all the help! NightExplorer96 (talk) 02:47, 25 May 2025 (UTC)

::I actually followed one of the link another gave to me and favorited the page all about the Wikipedia Commons licensing policies!

::According to it the new ShareAlike License is good to upload!

::Thank you! NightExplorer96 (talk) 02:54, 25 May 2025 (UTC)

:{{ping|NightExplorer96}} You having the permission is completely meaningless as you are not hosting it. Commons would need the permission, and Commons does not accept the Non-commercial (NC) or No Derivatives (ND) prongs for Creative Commons licences as those restrict what one can do with the image. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v ^{threads critiques} 17:16, 24 May 2025 (UTC)

::Okay. I had the picture owner change the license to a sharealike license.

::Would it be appropriate now? :)

::It is now this:

::- Attribution-ShareAlike 2.0 Generic

::Thank you for all the help! NightExplorer96 (talk) 02:47, 25 May 2025 (UTC)

::I actually followed one of the link another gave to me and favorited the page all about the Wikipedia Commons licensing policies!

::Thank you! NightExplorer96 (talk) 02:53, 25 May 2025 (UTC)

:You may show your Flickr contact this page, which explains what licences are suitable: WP:IfSM. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 21:01, 24 May 2025 (UTC)

::Okay. I had the picture owner change the license to a sharealike license.

::Would it be appropriate now? :)

::It is now this:

::- Attribution-ShareAlike 2.0 Generic

::Thank you for all the help! NightExplorer96 (talk) 02:47, 25 May 2025 (UTC)

:::@NightExplorer96 Afaict by [https://www.flickr.com/photos/iimacadam/52396710801/in/dateposted/], that license is acceptable. You'll of course have to wait until your Commons-block expires. And don't upload it as "own work", since per what you say here, the picture is not your own work. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 08:41, 25 May 2025 (UTC)

::I actually followed one of the link another gave to me and favorited the page all about the Wikipedia Commons licensing policies!

::Thank you! NightExplorer96 (talk) 02:53, 25 May 2025 (UTC)

Hi all. I just noticed that actress Jenna Ortega's article is a GA. For that reason, I am trying to expand the article of her film too, and I have left a note on its talk page: Talk:Winter Spring Summer or Fall. I need some guidance and help, thank you! M. Billoo 20:30, 24 May 2025 (UTC)

:I've left some comments on the article's talk page but haven't attempted to respond to a number of the points you raise. Responses by others would be helpful (I think better posted there rather than here). -- Hoary (talk) 22:27, 24 May 2025 (UTC)

Explanatory footnotes (whether or not made via Template:Efn) should aim for concision, and block indentation is only for long quotations. So yes, the notion that a footnote might contain a block quotation may seem wrongheaded. Still, if one is using Template:Efn and does feel compelled to perpetrate this, how is it best achieved?

.... blah blah blah body text.{{Efn|As Wigglesworth himself expressed this:{{Sfnp|Wigglesworth|1956|p=23}}{{Blockquote|text=Blah blah blah quotation....}}}}

results in a block quotation -- but one that's in a font larger than that of "As Wigglesworth himself expressed this:". (Replacing {{Blockquote| with {{Blockquote|style=font-size:80%| has no visible effect [Firefox under Debian].) -- Hoary (talk) 23:24, 24 May 2025 (UTC)

Hi. Is there a way to report an article which I suspect has been completely rewritten using an LLM? aps (talk) 03:49, 25 May 2025 (UTC)

:AaronPassion: Yes (sadly), there is a maintenance template {{tl|AI-generated}} which will categorise the article in :Category:Articles containing suspected AI-generated texts, and a series of user warning templates starting at {{tl|Uw-ai1}}. — ClaudineChionh (she/her · talk · email · global) 05:01, 25 May 2025 (UTC)

I frequently use the WP:Prosesize gadget (aka Page Size tool) and the WP:Who_Wrote_That%3F tool from my tool menu (the page size tool required enabling a gadget in my Preferences; the latter tool required installing a JS script). I've used both tools on many articles.

Neither tool works on the James Cook article. I don't think the issue is my computer, because I've tried the tools on several computers, and they don't work on any computer. The problem is only with that one article.

Can someone try the WP:Prosesize tool on James Cook and see if it works for them. Also, try the Who Wrote That? tool if you have it. If it fails for you: can anyone suggest a change to James Cook article to get the tools working? Noleander (talk) 04:11, 25 May 2025 (UTC)

:@Noleander Both work for me™. There was an unclosed sfn in the article which seems to have prevented some of the paragraphs from working with "who wrote that?", but after fixing that, I see no issues. Trim02 (talk) 04:38, 25 May 2025 (UTC)

::{{yo| Trim02 }} Thanks for taking the time to investigate.

::Tools still not working for me, even after fetching your change. Did it fail for you _before_ you made that sfn fix?

::A new data point: the "Who wrote that?" tool _does_ work for me in web browser before I log into WP. After I log in, it does not work. So perhaps it is some configuration/gadget setting within my Preferences? But why would the tools only fail on the James Cook article? Noleander (talk) 04:50, 25 May 2025 (UTC)

:::@Noleander No, they worked before the change. The paragraph where the sfn was didn't load in "wwt?" correctly, but the rest of the article did.
I can't think of any reason why "wwt?" works logged out but not logged in, since it's a browser extension it shouldn't interact with your account in any form. And it's only James Cook?
Only thing I can think of is to disable both of the tools, and force reload/empty cache and reenable them. Maybe close your browser and reopen, they might have entered a bad state or something, I dunno :/ Trim02 (talk) 05:08, 25 May 2025 (UTC)

::::This problem only happens on the James Cook article. I've tried both tools on dozens of other articles and they all work fine.

::::I don't think the sfn issue you fixed is related, it only impacted one paragraph. The failure I'm seeing is: absolutely nothing happens when you click the tool. Noleander (talk) 05:19, 25 May 2025 (UTC)

:::::{{u|Noleander}}, this question may be better suited to Village pump/technical. Cullen328 (talk) 05:25, 25 May 2025 (UTC)

::::::posted at VPT. Noleander (talk) 06:26, 25 May 2025 (UTC)

:::::It would have been too easy if it was just a single malformed template breaking stuff... Does any errors pop up in the console? (F12) If not, I've (unfortunately) got nothing else to suggest except to disable, reload and reenable.
Or ask at VP/T as Cullen suggests. Trim02 (talk) 05:31, 25 May 2025 (UTC)

I HAVE JUST RE-POSTED THIS DISCUSSION AS IT EXPIRED BEFORE I HAD A CHANGE TO WRITE AN ADDITIONAL QUESTION.

THIS IS WHAT I WROTE PREVIOUSLY [https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Village_pump/Copyright&diff=prev&oldid=1025623750]: I am very unsure about how to use Wiki-Commons. I am just about to do some major editing of a Wikipedia article about a board game, e.g., :en:Brass (board game) (Wikipedia 'free link'). I screen-shot the artwork of the game's title on the computer game version, available through Steam. The header is the word "Brass" on a brass plaque. The artwork is clearly not my own work, and I am not sure whether it is the game's logo, as it is the game's title. In addition, since it is a graphic of the game, I assume that the person in control of illustrating the computer version, Magdalena Mudlaff, or the illustrator of the original board game, Peter Dennis, have a copyright over such a graphic. How would I go about working out whether I can use the graphic or getting permission? I seem to see other board games with a complete picture of the game's box cover, including the board game logo, but I am just not sure how they managed to do that. Are such illustrations in the public domain, and, if not, how do they become so? Can you advise me? Thanks in advance for the time taken to lend your assistance.SMargan ({{int:Talkpagelinktext}}) 22:55, 28 April 2025 (UTC)

THIS WAS THE RESPONSE [https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Village_pump/Copyright&action=edit&oldid=1025668507]:

: {{ping|SMargan}} There are two separate issues here:

:# Can you upload these materials to Commons? Without seeing the images in question I can't say anything definitive, but it is very unlikely anything related to a game create in recent decades is in the public domain, unless (for example) the logo is too simple to copyright and you want to use that, or the game simply reuses images whose copyright has expired. Otherwise, you'd need the owners of the copyright to release these materials under a free license, and very few owners of commercially valuable materials are likely to do such a thing. If you want a detailed explanation of the issues involved in uploading materials like this to Commons, see Commons:Uploading works by a third party.

:# Failing that, can you upload these as non-free materials on the English-language Wikipedia without involving Commons? :en:Wikipedia:Non-free content allows for allowing certain non-free content (such as logos) directly to en-wiki.

- Jmabel ! talk 04:23, 29 April 2025 (UTC)

::: THIS IS MY LATEST AND FRESH RESPONSE Jmabel ! talk {{ping│Jmabel}} The logo is the word "Brass" on a brass plague background, as the logo of the 2008 board game "Brass". It is difficult to say whether this would be copyrighted as whilst the game was republished as "Brass - Lancashire" (2018) with a different logo, and the logo is pretty generic, the game was pretty popular and might be copyrighted. I have tried to upload the logo via the first method, but to no available, as I do not think this fits within the allowable criteria.

:::I am just a little unsure how to proceed with the second method. The link you gave, i.e. :en:Wikipedia:Non-free content does not seem to show how to do it, in a format I can understand. Is there a specific part of the page I was meant to be looking at. Can you advise? Is there a link to a "non-free content" uploading area? Thanks in advance for your time responding to this further query of mine.SMargan (talk) 08:02, 25 May 2025 (UTC)

Hello! I am editing Golden Eagle Award (Russia) and I noticed that Years of Award at Russian wiki page is numbered by year when Award ceremony took place (basically 2025 year AC awarded films from 2024), but in English Wikipedia Award Ceremony' years numbered by previous year(so not 2025 when it took place, nut 2024). Mb bcs at this official Russian award page outised Wikipedia it is called Nominees for 2024 year, but actual award took place next, 2025 year. Sorry for complicated explanation. So my question is: Can I move dates one year forward and numbered it by year in which AC takes place? Or it is better leave like it is now? Илона И (talk) 09:08, 25 May 2025 (UTC)

:{{ping|Илона И}} The page Golden Eagle Award (Russia) has no 2024 or 2025. I guess you refer to other pages in :Category:Golden Eagle Awards (Russia) but most of them also have no 2024 or 2025. Please always link the page your question is actually about. Give an example if there are multiple pages. Wikipedia languages are edited independently. I don't know the Russian Wikipedia and it doesn't matter to us. We usually list the year of the films in film awards. This is sometimes stated explicitly. If your unidentified pages don't say it then you could add it. PrimeHunter (talk) 09:45, 25 May 2025 (UTC)