engineered materials arrestor system

{{Short description|Bed of material at a runway's end to stop aircraft overrun}}

{{Globalize|article|USA|2name=the United States|date=February 2018}}

File:Functional EMAS Bed - NTSB Docket Photo.jpg

An engineered materials arrestor system, engineered materials arresting system (EMAS), or arrester bed{{cite news|last=Boburg|first=Shawn|title=Teterboro Airport gets $1M for runway project|url=http://www.northjersey.com/news/teterboro-airport-gets-1m-for-runway-project-for-runway-project-1.653136|access-date=5 May 2014|newspaper=northjersey.com|date=17 September 2013|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140505160617/http://www.northjersey.com/news/teterboro-airport-gets-1m-for-runway-project-for-runway-project-1.653136|archive-date=5 May 2014}} is a bed of engineered materials built at the end of a runway to reduce the severity of the consequences of an aircraft running off the end of a runway. Engineered materials are defined in FAA Advisory Circular No 150/5220-22B as "high energy absorbing materials of selected strength, which will reliably and predictably crush under the weight of an aircraft". While the current technology involves lightweight, crushable concrete blocks, any material that has been approved to meet the FAA Advisory Circular can be used for an EMAS. The purpose of an EMAS is to stop an aircraft overrun with no human injury and minimal aircraft damage. As the aircraft crushes the EMAS material, it loses energy and slows down. An EMAS is similar in concept to the runaway truck ramp or race circuit gravel trap, made of gravel or sand. It is intended to stop an aircraft that has overshot a runway when there is an insufficient free space for a standard runway safety area (RSA). Multiple patents have been issued on the construction and design on the materials and process.

File:Diagram of an EMASMAX system.png

FAA Advisory Circular 150/5220-22B explains that an EMAS may not be effective for incidents involving aircraft of less than {{convert|25,000|lb|kg|order=flip}} weight.[http://www.faa.gov/documentLibrary/media/Advisory_Circular/150_5220_22b.pdf] FAA Advisory Circular 150/5220-22B (PDF) It also clarifies that an EMAS is not the same as a stopway, which is defined in FAA Advisory Circular 150/5300-13A, Section 312.{{cite web |url=http://www.faa.gov/documentLibrary/media/Advisory_Circular/150-5300-13A-chg1-interactive.pdf |title=Archived copy |access-date=20 February 2015 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150221002109/http://www.faa.gov/documentLibrary/media/Advisory_Circular/150-5300-13A-chg1-interactive.pdf |archive-date=21 February 2015 }} FAA Advisory Circular 150/5300-13A (PDF) Pilots are advised, if they know the airplane is going to overrun onto an EMAS installation, to maintain directional control of the aircraft and roll straight into it. By doing this, the aircraft will come to a complete stop over a short distance, regardless of the runway conditions or braking action being experienced.{{Cite web |last1=Freeze |first1=Christopher |last2=Sedin |first2=Jeff |title=EMAS: Don't Swerve, Go Straight Ahead |url=https://www.alpa.org/news-and-events/air-line-pilot-magazine/emas-dont-swerve |access-date=2023-05-18 |website=www.alpa.org |publisher=Air Line Pilots Association |publication-date=August 2021}}

As of May 2017, the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) has been working on developing a harmonized regulation regarding arresting systems.

Research projects completed in Europe have looked into the cost-effectiveness of EMAS. Arrestor beds have been installed at airports where the runway safety areas are below standards, and their ability to stop aircraft with minimal or no damage to the airframe and its occupants has proven to bring results far beyond the cost of installations. The latest report, "Estimated Cost-Benefit Analysis of Runway Severity Reduction Based on Actual Arrestments", shows how the money saved through the first 11 arrestments has reached a calculated total of 1.9 billion USD, thus saving more than $1 B over the estimated cost of development (R&D, all installations worldwide, maintenance and repairs reaching a total of USD 600 million). The study suggests that mitigating the consequences of runway excursions worldwide may turn out to be much more cost-effective than the current focus on reducing the already very low probability of occurrence.{{Cite web|last=|first=|date=|title=Estimated Cost-Benefit Analysis of Runway Severity Reduction Based on Actual Arrestments|url=https://static1.squarespace.com/static/56a897fd5827c304cbfd26ae/t/56af4370fb36b19d653a43df/1454326673954/cost-benefit+analysis+arresting+system+copy.pdf|access-date=|website=}}

United States installations

File:EMAS Construction.jpg

File:EMAS bed with side steps.jpg (ARFF) access and passenger egress.]]

The FAA's design criteria for new airports designate Runway Safety Areas (RSAs) to increase the margin of safety if an overrun occurs and to provide additional access room for response vehicles. A United States federal law required that the length of RSAs in airports was to be {{convert|1000|ft}} by the end of 2015, in a response to a runway overrun into a highway at Teterboro Airport in New Jersey. At airports built before these standards were put into effect, the FAA has funded the installation of EMAS at the ends of main runways. The minimum recommended overall length of an EMAS installation is {{convert|600|ft}}, of which at least {{convert|400|ft}} is to consist of the frangible material.FAA AC 150-5220

As of 2017 the FAA reported that EMAS systems had been used 12 times, but that in some situations pilots tried to avoid the EMAS, steering to the grass sides in {{cvt|30|–|40|knots|abbr=out|lk=in}} low-energy events in order to avoid publicity.{{cite news |url= http://aviationweek.com/commercial-aviation/faa-confirms-cases-emas-phobia |title= FAA Confirms Cases of EMAS Phobia |date= 2 August 2017 |author= John Croft |work= Aviation Week Network}}

{{As of|April 2019}}, ESCO's EMAS is installed at 112 runway ends at 68 airports in the United States, with plans to install three EMAS systems at two additional U.S. airports.{{cite web |title=Fact Sheet – Engineered Material Arresting System (EMAS) |url=https://www.faa.gov/news/fact_sheets/news_story.cfm?newsId=13754 |access-date=8 April 2019 |publisher=Federal Aviation Administration}}

As of September 2024 the FAA reported that EMASMAX® is installed at 121 runway ends at 71 airports in the United States.{{Cite web |title=Engineered Material Arresting System (EMAS) {{!}} Federal Aviation Administration |url=https://www.faa.gov/newsroom/engineered-material-arresting-system-emas-0 |archive-url=http://web.archive.org/web/20241230043109/https://www.faa.gov/newsroom/engineered-material-arresting-system-emas-0 |archive-date=2024-12-30 |access-date=2025-01-12 |website=www.faa.gov |language=en}}

Non-U.S. installations

Of the 15 non-U.S. installations, eight were provided by Zodiac Arresting Systems (two in China, two in Madrid, one in Taipei, Taiwan (Songshan Airport), two in Norway and one in Saudi Arabia), six were provided by RunwaySafe (one in Switzerland, and three in overseas departments of France – one in Reunion Island, two in Mayotte), one in Japan, one in Germany, two in Brazil and one provided by Hankge (China).

The first EMAS installation within the Australasia was at Queenstown International Airport (NZQN / ZQN) in New Zealand, which finished in March 2025.{{Cite news |date=13 March 2025 |title=Queenstown Airport completes $23 million safety system it hopes to never use |url=https://www.stuff.co.nz/travel/360613055/queenstown-airport-completes-23-million-safety-system-it-hopes-never-use |access-date=13 March 2025 |work=Stuff}} An EMAS arrestor bed was installed at each end of the Runway 05/23 using the EMASMAX system developed by Runway Safe AB.{{Cite web |title=Queenstown Airport to install first EMAS in Australasia |url=https://www.queenstownairport.co.nz/media-releases/queenstown-airport-investing-millions-in-airfield-safety |access-date=2025-01-05 |website=Queenstown Airport |language=en-US}}

In November 2024 Wellington International Airport (NZWN / WLG) in New Zealand also announced that part of a NZ$500m programme of infrastructure works will include the installation of an EMAS system and thus provide a small increase in the operational length of the runway. Installation works are due to commence in March 2025.{{Cite web |date=2024-11-22 |title=Wellington Airport's $500m upgrade plan |url=https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/national/534513/wellington-airport-s-500m-upgrade-plan |access-date=2025-01-12 |website=RNZ |language=en-nz}}

United Kingdom installations

The first EMAS installation in the United Kingdom was at RAF Northolt (EGWU / NHT) in West London, United Kingdom. The EMAS installation occurred as part of a wider airfield improvement programme that took place in 2019 that included the resurfacing of the runways.{{Cite web |date=2019-04-15 |title=DIO starts work on Northolt runway resurfacing – Inside DIO |url=https://insidedio.blog.gov.uk/2019/04/15/dio-starts-work-on-northolt-runway-resurfacing/ |access-date=2025-01-05 |website=insidedio.blog.gov.uk |language=en}} The EMAS installation on Runway 07/25 was undertaken by Martin O'Connell Associates{{Cite web |title=Martin O'Connell Associates Limited |url=https://martinoconnell.co.uk/casestudies/northolt |access-date=2025-01-05 |website=martinoconnell.co.uk}} to implement the Runway Safe AB solution.{{Cite web |title=NHT – Royal Air Force Station |url=https://runwaysafe.com/references/nht-royal-air-force-station/ |access-date=2025-01-05 |website=Runway Safe |language=en-GB}}

Over the winter of 2022/23 two EMAS arrestor beds were installed at each end of Runway 09/27 at London City Airport (EGLC / LCY) in London, United Kingdom. The chosen solution was developed by Runway Safe AB{{Cite web |last=Runwaysafe |date=2022-10-21 |title=London City airport invests in safety enhancing technology EMAS |url=https://runwaysafe.com/london-city-airport-invests-in-safety-enhancing-technology-emas/ |access-date=2025-01-03 |website=Runway Safe |language=en-GB}} and installed by blu-3 (UK) Limited.{{Cite web |last=Harry |date=2022-10-14 |title=blu-3 secures landmark aviation contract for London City Airport |url=https://www.blu-3.co.uk/blu-3-secures-landmark-aviation-contract-for-london-city-airport |access-date=2025-01-03 |website=Blu-3 |language=en-US}}

File:Lcy-resa-works-1w-02-05-23.webp

FAA-approved manufacturers

{{As of|2018|February|df=}}, there were three recognized EMAS materials (from two manufacturers worldwide) that meet the FAA requirements of Advisory Circular 150-5220-22B, "Engineered Materials Arresting Systems for Aircraft Overruns." (The FAA must review and approve each EMAS installation.){{Cite web |title=AC 150/5220-22B - Engineered Materials Arresting Systems (EMAS) for Aircraft Overruns |url=https://www.faa.gov/airports/resources/advisory_circulars/index.cfm/go/document.current/documentNumber/150_5220-22}}

The first EMAS was developed in the mid-1990s by ESCO/Engineered Arresting Systems Corp. (later Zodiac Arresting Systems) as part of a collaboration and technical acceptance by the FAA. The fourth generation EMAS arrestor beds are composed of blocks of lightweight, crushable cellular concrete material, encased in jet blast resistant protection, designed to safely stop airplanes that overshoot runways. Zodiac's EMAS is installed on over 110 airport runways at over 65 airports on three continents.{{when|date=August 2020}} Zodiac's EMAS has undergone aircraft test runs at speeds up {{convert|55|kn}} and is the only EMAS that has safely stopped aircraft in emergency overrun situations at commercial airports. Zodiac stopped production of EMAS systems as the U.S market slowed down and competition increased in the international market.{{cite web |url=https://www.faa.gov/news/fact_sheets/news_story.cfm?newsId=13754 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120716061335/http://www.faa.gov/news/fact_sheets/news_story.cfm?newsId=13754 |archive-date=16 July 2012 |title=Fact Sheet – Engineered Material Arresting System (EMAS)}}

The Swedish company Runway Safe AB developed an EMAS system, a foamed silica bed made from recycled glass contained within a high-strength plastic mesh system anchored to the pavement at the end of the runway. The foamed silica is poured into lanes bounded by the mesh and covered with a poured cement layer and treated with a top coat of sealant.FAA Fact Sheet – Engineered Material Arresting System (EMAS)

A third manufacturer, certified by the Chinese CAAC, has a product that is very similar to the original Zodiac EMAS; however, it is not FAA approved.International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO), Engineered Materials Arresting System (EMAS) Implementation In China, vol. A40-WP/331. 2019, p. 3–5.

Incidents

There have been numerous cases of EMAS systems working as designed in real-life scenarios, these examples include:

In May 1999, a Saab 340 commuter aircraft with 30 persons aboard overran the runway at JFK.{{Cite web |last=Ranter |first=Harro |title=Accident Saab 340B N232AE, Saturday 8 May 1999 |url=https://asn.flightsafety.org/wikibase/323749 |access-date=2025-01-09 |website=asn.flightsafety.org}}
In May 2003, a Gemini Cargo MD-11 cargo aircraft with 3 persons aboard overran the runway at JFK.{{Cite news |agency=Associated Press |date=2003-05-31 |title=Plane Overshoots A Runway at J.F.K. |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2003/05/31/nyregion/plane-overshoots-a-runway-at-jfk.html |access-date=2025-01-09 |work=The New York Times |language=en-US |issn=0362-4331}}
In January 2005, a Boeing 747 cargo aircraft with 3 persons aboard overran the runway at JFK.
In July 2006, a Dassault Falcon 900 business aircraft with 5 persons aboard overran the runway at Greenville Downtown Airport in South Carolina.{{Cite web |last=Ranter |first=Harro |title=Incident Dassault Falcon 900 N699BG, Monday 17 July 2006 |url=https://asn.flightsafety.org/wikibase/216056 |access-date=2025-01-09 |website=asn.flightsafety.org}}
In July 2008, an Airbus A320 commercial airliner with 145 persons aboard overran the runway at Chicago's O'Hare Airport.{{Cite web |last=Ranter |first=Harro |title=Runway excursion Incident Airbus A320-231 F-OHME, Saturday 19 July 2008 |url=https://asn.flightsafety.org/wikibase/21776 |access-date=2025-01-09 |website=asn.flightsafety.org}}
On 19 January 2010, a Bombardier CRJ-200 commercial regional airliner with 34 persons aboard overran the runway at Yeager Airport in Charleston, West Virginia after a rejected takeoff."PSA Airlines Canadair CRJ-200 N246PS operating as US Airways flight 2495 from Charleston, West Virginia (CRW) to Charlotte, North Carolina (CLT) with 30 passengers [sic] and 3 crew, overran the runway following a rejected take-off. The aircraft was stopped by the EMAS at the end of the runway, sustaining only minor damage to its landing gear doors."
On 1 October 2010, a Gulfstream G-IV business aircraft with 10 persons aboard overran the runway at Teterboro Airport in Teterboro, New Jersey.{{cite web|title=Private jet overshoots runway at Teterboro Airport |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120329061406/http://www.myfoxny.com/dpp/news/local_news/new_jersey/plane-overshoots-runway-at-teterboro-airport-20101001-apx |archive-date=29 March 2012 |url-status=dead |url=http://www.myfoxny.com/dpp/news/local_news/new_jersey/plane-overshoots-runway-at-teterboro-airport-20101001-apx |access-date=28 October 2016 }}
On 2 November 2011, a Cessna Citation II business aircraft with 5 persons aboard overran the runway at Key West International Airport in Key West, Florida."A Cessna Citation landed at Key West. The flight, which originated in Fort Lauderdale with 3 passengers and 2 crew, had a brake failure upon landing in Key West and was successfully stopped by the airport's newly installed EMAS. Only minor injuries were reported."{{cite news|title=No one is hurt after small plane crash lands at Key West Airport|url=http://www.nj.com/news/index.ssf/2011/11/no_one_is_hurt_after_small_pla.html|access-date=24 August 2012|newspaper=NJ.com|date=4 November 2011}}{{cite web|title=Aviation Accident Brief ERA12IA060|url=https://www.ntsb.gov/aviationquery/brief.aspx?ev_id=20111103X34623&key=1|publisher=NTSB}}
In October 2013, a Cessna 680 Citation business aircraft with 8 persons aboard overran the runway at Palm Beach International in West Palm Beach, Florida.
In January 2016, a Dassault Falcon 20 aircraft with 2 persons aboard overran the runway at Chicago Executive Airport in Wheeling, Illinois.{{Cite news|url=http://www.ainonline.com/aviation-news/business-aviation/2016-01-28/emas-saves-falcon-20-chicago-executive|title=EMAS Saves Falcon 20 at Chicago Executive|work=Aviation International News|access-date=16 May 2017|language=en}}
In October 2016, a Boeing 737 aircraft with 37 persons aboard, including Republican vice-presidential candidate Mike Pence, overran the runway at LaGuardia Airport, New York.{{Cite news|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2016/10/28/us/plane-with-mike-pence-aboard-skids-off-la-guardia-runway.html|title=Plane With Mike Pence Aboard Skids Off La Guardia Runway|last=Mele|first=Christopher|date=27 October 2016|access-date=28 October 2016|issn=0362-4331|newspaper=The New York Times}}{{Cite news|url=http://atwonline.com/safety/laguardia-runway-emas-saves-us-vp-candidate-aircraft?NL=ATW-04&Issue=ATW-04_20161028_ATW-04_158&sfvc4enews=42&cl=article_4_b&elq2=289b883c3785471c8722459a1f9ea8c4|title=LaGuardia runway EMAS saves US VP candidate aircraft|last=Walker|first=Karen|date=27 October 2016|access-date=29 October 2016|newspaper=Air Transport World}}{{Cite web|url=http://avherald.com/h?article=49ff6bcc&opt=1|title=Accident: Eastern Air Lines B737 at New York on Oct 27th 2016, overran runway on landing long|last=Hradecky|first=Simon|website=avherald.com|access-date=30 October 2016}}
In April 2017, a Cessna 750 Citation aircraft with 2 persons aboard overran the runway at Bob Hope Airport in Burbank, California.
On 4 February 2018, a A Beech Jet 400A aircraft with 2 persons aboard overran the runway at Burke Lakefront Airport (BKL) in Cleveland, Ohio.{{Cite web |last=Ranter |first=Harro |title=Accident Raytheon Beechjet 400A N570TM, Sunday 4 February 2018 |url=https://asn.flightsafety.org/wikibase/319727 |access-date=2025-01-12 |website=asn.flightsafety.org}}
In December 2018, a Boeing 737 aircraft with 117 persons aboard overran Runway 8 at Bob Hope Airport in Burbank, California.{{Cite web|url=https://aviation-safety.net/wikibase/wiki.php?id=219098|title=Runway excursion Incident Boeing 737-7H4 (WL) N752SW, 06 Dec 2018|last=Ranter|first=Harro|website=aviation-safety.net|access-date=6 December 2018}}
On 27 February 2019 an Embraer Phenom 100 operated by Quest Diagnostic Laboratories overran a runway at the Charles B. Wheeler Kansas City Downtown Airport (KMKC) at 4:28am local time resulting in the safe stopping of the aircraft with the pilot being the only occupant aboard.{{Cite news |last=Rice |first=Glenn |date=February 27, 2019 |title=Wheeler Downtown Airport reopens after airplane slid off runway in icy weather |url=https://www.kansascity.com/news/local/article226857969.html |access-date=6 January 2025 |work=Kansas City Star}}
On 4 February 2021, a Dassault F900 aircraft with 2 persons aboard overran the runway at Chicago Executive-Wheeling Airport (PWK) in Chicago, Illinois.{{Cite web |last=CHICAGO (CBS) |date=2021-02-05 |title=Plane Slides Off Runway at Chicago Executive Airport |url=https://www.nbcchicago.com/news/local/plane-slides-off-runway-at-chicago-executive-airport-2/2430391/ |access-date=2025-01-12 |website=NBC Chicago |language=en-US}}{{Cite web |date=2021-02-05 |title=Plane Slides Off Runway At Chicago Executive Airport In Wheeling - CBS Chicago |url=https://www.cbsnews.com/chicago/news/plane-slides-off-runway-at-chicago-executive-airport-in-wheeling/?taid=601d79933cb4af0001e7ea28 |access-date=2025-01-12 |website=www.cbsnews.com |language=en-US}}
On 21 July 2021, a Cessna Citation Excel aircraft with 6 persons aboard overran the runway at Reading Regional Airport (RDG) in Reading, Pennsylvania.{{Cite web |date=2021-07-21 |title=Small plane skids off runway at Reading Regional Airport |url=https://6abc.com/reading-airport-pennsylvania-plane-skids-off-runway-pa/10902184/ |access-date=2025-01-12 |website=6abc Philadelphia |language=en}}{{Cite web |date=2021-07-22 |title=Airplane that ran off runway at Reading Regional Airport remains there a day later |url=https://www.readingeagle.com/2021/07/22/airplane-that-ran-off-runway-at-reading-regional-airport-remains-there-a-day-later/ |access-date=2025-01-12 |website=Reading Eagle |language=en-US}}
On 22 September 2021, an Aero Vodochody L-39C Albatros aircraft operated by Aero Flight Solutions LLC with 1 person aboard overran the runway at Witham Field Airport (SUA) in Stuart, Florida.{{Cite web |last=Ranter |first=Harro |title=Incident Aero Vodochody L-39C Albatros N20GX, Wednesday 22 September 2021 |url=https://asn.flightsafety.org/wikibase/351812 |access-date=2025-01-12 |website=asn.flightsafety.org}}
On 20 March 2022, a Cessna 650 aircraft with 2 persons aboard overran the runway at Key West International Airport (EYW) in Key West, Florida.{{Cite web |last=Miles |first=Mandy |date=2022-03-21 |title=PRIVATE PLANE GOES OFF THE RUNWAY AT KEY WEST AIRPORT SUNDAY EVENING |url=https://keysweekly.com/42/private-plane-goes-off-the-runway-at-key-west-airport-sunday-evening/ |access-date=2025-01-12 |website=Florida Keys Weekly Newspapers |language=en-US}}
On 9 April 2023, a Cessna 402C aircraft with 2 persons aboard overran the runway at Key West International Airport (EYW) in Key West, Florida.{{Cite web |last=Ranter |first=Harro |title=Accident Cessna 402C N404PJ, Sunday 9 April 2023 |url=https://asn.flightsafety.org/wikibase/311324 |access-date=2025-01-12 |website=asn.flightsafety.org}}
On 18 October 2023, a Beechcraft BE30 aircraft with 2 persons aboard overran the runway at DeKalb-Peachtree Airport (PDK) in Atlanta, Georgia.{{Cite web |last=Ranter |first=Harro |title=Accident Beechcraft 300 Super King Air N93GA, Wednesday 18 October 2023 |url=https://asn.flightsafety.org/wikibase/346977 |access-date=2025-01-12 |website=asn.flightsafety.org}}{{Cite AV media |url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PlZksi_UMIc |title=Plane overshoots runway during landing at DeKalb-Peachtree Airport, officials say |date=2023-10-19 |last=11Alive |access-date=2025-01-12 |via=YouTube}}
On 20 July 2024, a Hawker 900XP aircraft with 2 persons aboard overran the runway at Telluride Regional Airport (TEX) in Telluride, Colorado.{{Cite web |last=Ranter |first=Harro |title=Accident Hawker 900XP N526FC, Saturday 20 July 2024 |url=https://asn.flightsafety.org/wikibase/403328 |access-date=2025-01-12 |website=asn.flightsafety.org}}

Additional media coverage of EMAS statistics, installations, and general news include:

After the 8 December 2005 overshoot of Southwest Airlines Flight 1248 at Midway International Airport in Chicago, Illinois, which is located in a heavily congested area, an EMAS was installed on Rwy 13C/31C.{{cite web|title=KMDW Airport Diagram|url=http://flightaware.com/resources/airport/MDW/APD/AIRPORT+DIAGRAM/pdf|access-date=7 January 2008}}
On 13 October 2006, New York Yankees player Alex Rodriguez's private jet was brought to a halt safely by the EMAS installation at Bob Hope Airport in Burbank, California. The system was installed after the 2000 Southwest Airlines Flight 1455 runway overshoot that injured 43 passengers and the captain.{{cite news|url=https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-2006-oct-14-me-burair14-story.html|title=Yankee Player's Jet Overruns Runway in Burbank|first=Jennifer|last=Oldham|work=Los Angeles Times|date=14 October 2006|quote=The airport installed the $4-million safety system after a Southwest Airlines Boeing 737 skidded off the same runway and onto a street in 2000, injuring 43 passengers and the captain on the same runway.}}
On 1 May 2017, the FAA issued a summary citing twelve incidents of aircraft stopped by EMAS, involving a total of 284 passengers and crew.[http://www.faa.gov/news/fact_sheets/news_story.cfm?newsId=13754] FAA Fact Sheet

References

External links

[http://www.faa.gov/documentLibrary/media/advisory_circular/150-5220-22A/150_5220_22a.pdf EMAS at the FAA website]
[http://www.airliners.net/open.file?id=1124053 Gulfstream II stopped by EMAS at Burbank]
[http://www.flightsafety.org/asw/aug06/asw_aug06_p13-19.pdf "Rethinking Overrun Protection"] - Aerosafety World, Aug. 2006 (Three EMAS Saves: 1999, 2003, 2005)
[http://www.ainonline.com/aviation-news/business-aviation/2016-01-28/emas-saves-falcon-20-chicago-executive "EMAS Saves Falcon 20 at Chicago Executive"]
[http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&d=PALL&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsrchnum.htm&r=1&f=G&l=50&s1=6,726,400.PN.&OS=PN/6,726,400&RS=PN/6,726,400 Patent No. 6,726,400; Vehicle arresting bed systems ] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190607212154/http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&d=PALL&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsrchnum.htm&r=1&f=G&l=50&s1=6%2C726%2C400.PN.&OS=PN%2F6%2C726%2C400&RS=PN%2F6%2C726%2C400 |date=7 June 2019 }}
[http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&d=PALL&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsrchnum.htm&r=1&f=G&l=50&s1=5,902,068.PN.&OS=PN/5,902,068&RS=PN/5,902,068 Patent No. 5,902,068; Vehicle arresting unit fabrication methods] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190606122040/http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&d=PALL&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsrchnum.htm&r=1&f=G&l=50&s1=5%2C902%2C068.PN.&OS=PN%2F5%2C902%2C068&RS=PN%2F5%2C902%2C068 |date=6 June 2019 }}
[http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&d=PALL&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsrchnum.htm&r=1&f=G&l=50&s1=5,885,025.PN.&OS=PN/5,885,025&RS=PN/5,885,025 Patent No. 5,885,025; Vehicle arresting bed systems ] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190608143235/http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&d=PALL&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsrchnum.htm&r=1&f=G&l=50&s1=5%2C885%2C025.PN.&OS=PN%2F5%2C885%2C025&RS=PN%2F5%2C885%2C025 |date=8 June 2019 }}
[http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&d=PALL&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsrchnum.htm&r=1&f=G&l=50&s1=5,789,681.PN.&OS=PN/5,789,681&RS=PN/5,789,681 Patent No. 5,789,681; Arresting material test apparatus and methods] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190606122042/http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&d=PALL&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsrchnum.htm&r=1&f=G&l=50&s1=5%2C789%2C681.PN.&OS=PN%2F5%2C789%2C681&RS=PN%2F5%2C789%2C681 |date=6 June 2019 }}
[http://runwaysafe.com/ Swedish company Runwaysafe AB]

Category:Airport infrastructure

Category:Runway safety

Category:Vehicle braking technologies