user talk:Technopat#You're not an admin.

Can you explain why you're reverting my edit? Simply reverting without a meaningful edit summary is very rude. Parsecboy (talk) 11:15, 4 July 2023 (UTC)

• [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AParsecboy&diff=1163352556&oldid=1163352295 Replied.] --Technopat (talk) 11:20, 4 July 2023 (UTC)

I am correcting the misinformation concerning nationalities of people! You need to be aware that England is NOT an official sovereign country!

The sources for my edits were the US Census QuickFacts and a few other surveys in the demographics section of the articles. Should I copy that source again or is it better to use a source that discusses the demographics of the cities rather than just listing census data?

Also, is there some way that I can respond on my talk page to make you see my message? I don't know how to do this. 135.180.146.84 (talk) 16:41, 6 July 2023 (UTC)

: [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3A135.180.146.84&diff=1163868717&oldid=1163721288 Replied.] --Technopat (talk) 20:57, 6 July 2023 (UTC)

You mentioned on my talk page that I don't cite sources when I do cite multiple sources so where did I not cite sources??? You cant make a statement and not tell me where. Fortnitegamer3432 (talk) 20:43, 7 July 2023 (UTC)

• [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AFortnitegamer3432&diff=1164076906&oldid=1164074314 Replied.] --Technopat (talk) 21:01, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
• :The YouTube video was a interview with the former Pakistani Minister of Interior, its not the only source citing Hamid Gul's participation in the battle of Jalalabad there are plenty of other sources considering the reason he got sacked was because of that specific Operations failure Fortnitegamer3432 (talk) 21:31, 7 July 2023 (UTC)

• [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AFortnitegamer3432&diff=1164083617&oldid=1164076906 Replied.] --Technopat (talk) 21:40, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
• :I am correcting the misinformation concerning nationalities of people! You need to be aware that England is NOT an official sovereign country! arsehole 180.150.80.232 (talk) 14:50, 9 March 2025 (UTC)

:e Article already mentioned Hamid Gul's Participation in the Battle of Jalalabad so I dont see how getting mad over a source was nessacary considering there already is a sourceh

:Fortnitegamer3432 (talk) 21:40, 7 July 2023 (UTC)

::The Article already had the Source* Fortnitegamer3432 (talk) 21:40, 7 July 2023 (UTC)

• [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AFortnitegamer3432&diff=1164086114&oldid=1164083960 Replied.] --Technopat (talk) 21:53, 7 July 2023 (UTC)

File:Information.svg Thank you for making a report about {{userblock|SaulGoodman6969}} at Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism. Reporting and removing vandalism is vital to the functioning of Wikipedia and all users are encouraged to revert, warn, and report vandalism. However, it appears that the editor you reported may not have engaged in vandalism, or the user was not sufficiently or appropriately warned. Please note there is a difference between vandalism and unhelpful or misguided edits made in good faith. If the user continues to vandalise after a recent final warning, please re-report it. Thank you. IanDBeacon (talk) 16:55, 8 July 2023 (UTC)

• Just for the record (for future reference): The user, after having received a sufficient number of warnings from other users, including a "may be blocked from editing without further warning" from an admin, continued to removed perfectly valid references, on at least two occasions that I was aware of: [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Indiana_Jones_and_the_Dial_of_Destiny&diff=1164186782&oldid=1164183855 (an edit which had been reverted before I could do so] and [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Indiana_Jones_and_the_Dial_of_Destiny&diff=prev&oldid=1164233646 (and one that I reverted)]. This second edit was made after [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Indiana_Jones_and_the_Dial_of_Destiny&diff=1164213251&oldid=1164207394 the page had been protected]. That is not, in my humble opinion, mere "unhelpful or misguided edits made in good faith". --Technopat (talk) 17:29, 8 July 2023 (UTC)

Hello. Could you explain why you {{diff|Genetic recombination|1164436309||reverted my edit}} to Genetic recombination, please? Thank you. 47.155.41.201 (talk) 09:03, 9 July 2023 (UTC)

• [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3A47.155.41.201&diff=1164458468&oldid=1157360536 Replied and apologised.] --Technopat (talk) 09:28, 9 July 2023 (UTC)

Don't revert if you don't know what is happening. 24.161.76.18 (talk) 15:40, 9 July 2023 (UTC)

• [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3A24.161.76.18&diff=1164515557&oldid=1156788209 Replied.] --Technopat (talk) 15:48, 9 July 2023 (UTC)

Please explain why you reverted my edit about the date of death of Dr. Anthony Stevens?

Don't revert if you don't know what is happening! Иван Куряков (talk) 07:50, 14 July 2023 (UTC)

• [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3A%D0%98%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD_%D0%9A%D1%83%D1%80%D1%8F%D0%BA%D0%BE%D0%B2&diff=1165295417&oldid=1165295288 Replied.] --Technopat (talk) 07:55, 14 July 2023 (UTC)

Sorry for the sandbox. TYCF (talk) 10:45, 16 July 2023 (UTC)

Why did you revert the edit when there is no active content dispute or edit war ? Elvetham Heath TYCF (talk) 12:30, 16 July 2023 (UTC)

:From Wikipedia:Stable version . TYCF (talk) 12:33, 16 July 2023 (UTC)

• [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3ATYCF&diff=1165637081&oldid=1164438201 Replied.] --Technopat (talk) 12:58, 16 July 2023 (UTC)

::It is not a edit war. TYCF (talk) 12:54, 16 July 2023 (UTC)

::Technopat, I know there are some unsourced content, but they are there before I started editing. And I don't understand why it is excessive and also, is it too long because of the images ? TYCF (talk) 13:19, 16 July 2023 (UTC)

::Also, can I revert your edit but remove the unsourced content and some photos . TYCF (talk) 13:23, 16 July 2023 (UTC)

• [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3ATYCF&diff=1165640478&oldid=1165639530 Replied.] --Technopat (talk) 13:28, 16 July 2023 (UTC)
• :Stop reverting them , I removed the things that you said were not good. TYCF (talk) 15:09, 16 July 2023 (UTC)

• [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3ATYCF&diff=1165658137&oldid=1165653410 Replied.] --Technopat (talk) 15:48, 16 July 2023 (UTC)
• :Thank you ! TYCF (talk) 17:24, 16 July 2023 (UTC)

Don't bother. I think reverting their edits is just baiting and feeding them. Edward-Woodrow :) _[talk] 17:15, 20 July 2023 (UTC)

:Thank you for your note. You may have other opinions and experiences. Technopat (talk) 17:22, 20 July 2023 (UTC)

::Makes sense. Thanks. Edward-Woodrow :) _[talk] 17:23, 20 July 2023 (UTC)

Sent by {{noping|Zippybonzo}} using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) at 07:51, 21 July 2023 (UTC)

can we please talk? I'm trying to be civil but it feels like your messing with me Wwew345t (talk) 23:58, 21 July 2023 (UTC)

:dont blame me for a edit war that your refusing to stop Wwew345t (talk) 02:29, 22 July 2023 (UTC)

• [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AWwew345t&diff=1166553001&oldid=1166520399 Replied]. --Technopat (talk) 09:09, 22 July 2023 (UTC)

sir you need to visit "pakistan army equipment" page there are some informations which are based on unreliable source's, these sources itself using Wikipedia as a source and just copy pasting unreliable information of Wikipedia (uncited).And patriotic people's using these sources to save unreliable information. I researched a lot and try to edit it with reliable sources (india/pakistan army equipment) Page's,but one person still reediting it many times.I am not saying I am completely right that's why I need your help, visit page and make conclusions/edit. Dl ff (talk) 11:33, 22 July 2023 (UTC)

• [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3ADl_ff&diff=1166565645&oldid=1166563824 Reply (to be continued...)]. --Technopat (talk) 11:38, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
• :Thanks for replying,the person who is reediting informations gave source of "armedforces.eu"
• :For your help.
• :Just go on 'see more section'(below in article and before about us section) and click on 'source'and than see what source it's coding in smerch/A-100 MLRS and M109 spg,in this page. (the same source of armedforces.eu he gave)

https://armedforces.eu/land_forces/self_propelled_artillery/M109

https://armedforces.eu/land_forces/rocket_artillery/BM-30_Smerch Dl ff (talk) 13:12, 22 July 2023 (UTC)

• [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3ADl_ff&diff=1166647917&oldid=1166565645 Replied more fully (to be continued...)]. --Technopat (talk) 22:24, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
• :Thanks,I was saying the number of M109(self propelled artillery) and A-100(Rocket launchers) are wrong in this page.someone randomly gave random numbers,and other sources who uses Wikipedia as a source also updated their data(based on wiki random numbers) and the same unreliable source people's are citing.I have reliable sources and Numbers of weapons but i don't want to be in the edit war,You test these sources, if you find them reliable, then edit on the basis of them. I think it is at least more reliable than uncited, and random numbers.
• :*For A-100(Rocket artillery)
• :Current Random number of launchers - 800+
• :Based on source - 36
• :Sources -
• :1.https://militaryleak.com/2019/01/09/pakistan-army-inducts-a-100-multiple-rocket-launcher-system-in-artillery-corps/?amp=1
• :2.https://www.militarytoday.com/artillery/a100.htm
• :3.https://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/china/a100.htm
• :4.https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/34517
• :*For M-109(Self propelled artillery)
• :Current Random number - 785
• :Based on sources - 438
• :Sources
• :1.https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/defence/in-a-first-pakistan-showcases-nuke-capable-howitzer/articleshow/90416975.cms?from=mdr
• :2.https://en.dailypakistan.com.pk/23-Mar-2022/in-a-first-pakistan-showcases-nuclear-capable-sh-15-howitzer-in-national-day-parade
• :3.https://www.armyrecognition.com/defense_news_march_2022_global_security_army_industry/pakistan_unveils_its_new_chinese-made_sh-15_155mm_6x6_howitzers_during_national_day_parade.html
• :4.http://www.defenseindustrydaily.com/pakistan-requests-115-m109a5-selfpropelled-howitzers-01645/
• :*According to this source number of m109 in pakistani army is 275
• :https://tanks-encyclopedia.com/coldwar/US/M109_Paladin.php#google_vignette Dl ff (talk) 02:35, 23 July 2023 (UTC)
• :*For M110(Self propelled artillery)
• :Number 1 and 2 source of M109(previous comment).
• :*sh-15(Self propelled artillery)
• :pakistan ordered 236 artillery's but delivery of all systems are not completed,but in page it's mentioned '236-300 artillery's are in service ' if delivery of all systems is not completed than how all artillery's are operational, some system's are delivered but numbers are unknown.
• :Source -
• :1.https://www.janes.com/defence-news/news-detail/chinas-norinco-delivers-sh-15-howitzers-to-pakistan
• :2.https://www.livemint.com/news/india/china-is-helping-pakistan-army-build-defence-infrastructure-along-loc-officials-11687716143177.html Dl ff (talk) 03:09, 23 July 2023 (UTC)

l edited,'pakistan army equipment' page with citation's.You can check all changes,if I made any mistake than correct it. Dl ff (talk) 14:27, 23 July 2023 (UTC)

Hi, this message is regarding that IP editor (35.134.216.96) you recently reported to AIV; the Wikipedia sandbox is literally a place where editors can experiment with editing Wikipedia and find out how things work, make test edits, etc. It even says in most user warning templates to use the sandbox for test/experimental edits. They can make pretty much any kind of edits they want. The only exceptions to this are what it says in the bottom of the sandbox header, "Please DO NOT place promotional, copyrighted, offensive, or libelous content in sandboxes.", so if you do come across sandbox edits that blatantly and strongly go against that, then do go ahead and remove them, and I would write a notice on their talk page telling them not to place promotional, copyright, or libellous content in the sandbox. But the edits I've seen from that IP, just look like normal test edits to me and certainly did not need to be immediately reverted, let alone warned for.

For these reasons, your report at AIV of that IP was declined.

So yeah, just thought I'd let you know it's not really necessary to warn and report users over most kinds of sandbox edits. I would save the time and effort for patrolling over other article edits instead. — AP 499D25 (talk) 04:21, 28 July 2023 (UTC)

• [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:AP_499D25&diff=prev&oldid=1167533503 Replied.] --Technopat (talk) 09:27, 28 July 2023 (UTC)

User-An asphalt undid cited changes on 'pakistan army equipment page' which was given by (user-Mr khomri),the changes did by Mr khomri includes numbers of artillery's,which was(before mr khomri edited it) uncited,and Randomly put by editors.Also many source's which are present in notes section are dead.The reason why I ask you for help again and again is this - I am not an old or big editor, even if I edit by giving reliable source, still many people revert it without seeing it. It would be better if you solve the problem by visiting this page. Dl ff (talk) 03:39, 30 July 2023 (UTC)

Please look at Yadava page & revert to old version. Narayana-Narayana (talk) 14:41, 30 July 2023 (UTC)

• {{Done}}. --Technopat (talk) 15:04, 30 July 2023 (UTC)

Why you removed that infobox ? Explain me otherwise I will brought this matter to Noticeboard Khan Of Naral (talk) 08:12, 1 August 2023 (UTC)

• [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AKhan_Of_Naral&diff=1168185175&oldid=1168181981 Replied.] --Technopat (talk) 08:20, 1 August 2023 (UTC)
• :Then add yourself. There are thousands of pages on Wikipedia which were similar to this infobox. Same on Jadoon Tribe page but why you people only have problem with Swatis. I added like them. Either remove from every wiki article either left it on our page or add yourself Khan Of Naral (talk) 08:45, 1 August 2023 (UTC)

• Replying here: The fact that there are "thousands of pages on Wikipedia" (I'd actually go as far as to say tens of thousands) that do not fully comply with the Manual doesn't mean that you should, knowingly, add to that number. I use the term 'knowingly' since you now have the corresponding link to the Manual in order for you to contribute to Wikipedia in a constructive manner. Regards, --Technopat (talk) 08:52, 1 August 2023 (UTC)

File:Information icon4.svg There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. This matter should be discussed on Noticeboard as you both are trying to distort history without any reference Khan Of Naral (talk) 10:22, 1 August 2023 (UTC)

File:Information icon4.svg There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Ghmyrtle (talk) 19:22, 9 August 2023 (UTC)

Hamidahah Begum Ali Hasan Fateh

E-Tabaqat USER769 (talk) 03:57, 13 August 2023 (UTC)

• You see that bit up there at the top of this page, the bit that goes "... if you came here because I undid or reverted your unsourced content, there's really no point bringing it up here. Just cite your references to the article you edited."? Still holds. --Technopat (talk) 12:56, 13 August 2023 (UTC)

Hi Technopat, why did you revert the changes by @MihaiClear? Regards --WikiUser1234945-- (talk) 14:45, 13 August 2023 (UTC)

• [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3A--WikiUser1234945--&diff=1170175401&oldid=1170174435 Replied.] --Technopat (talk) 14:59, 13 August 2023 (UTC)

:I don't make vandalism! I'm asking about if you flag the edits made by IPs such as "I'm gay" on pages as vandalism and revert! MihaiClear (talk) 14:48, 13 August 2023 (UTC)

• [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AMihaiClear&diff=1170178431&oldid=1168430892 Replied.] --Technopat (talk) 15:23, 13 August 2023 (UTC)

Hello! 5 links for vandalism edits! Give me 5! Not too much, not too few! Best wishes, MihaiClear (talk) 15:27, 13 August 2023 (UTC)

• [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AMihaiClear&diff=1170180338&oldid=1170178431 Replied.] --Technopat (talk) 15:39, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
• :Oops, IPs that makes vandalism! Best wishes, MihaiClear (talk) 15:41, 13 August 2023 (UTC)

• Replying here. Sorry, still don't get the point you're making. --Technopat (talk) 15:57, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
• :Ok. Closed! MihaiClear (talk) 18:25, 13 August 2023 (UTC)

So you know, that's {{U|Mihai000}}; at this point the DUCKs can probably just be reported straight to AIV. 74.73.224.126 (talk) 20:24, 14 August 2023 (UTC)

Hi, the person with the Arabic user name have deleted some of the stuff on the page of Emperor Tewodros. Why did he do so? Suriav6380 (talk) 11:47, 19 August 2023 (UTC)

:Hi, the user with the Arabic alphabet is damaging pages of Ethiopian Emperors. Deleting their background and other. This is not the first time I have seen him doing such acts. Suriav6380 (talk) 18:59, 19 August 2023 (UTC)

• No comment. --Technopat (talk) 21:49, 19 August 2023 (UTC)

By what right have you manipulated the content, based on falsehoods, permission to delete and malicious manipulation by another user, and approval of it. If this is the policy of wikipedia, it allows users, for example, verified, to do destructive manipulations, what is this policy?! Parmin khosravi (talk) 12:58, 23 August 2023 (UTC)

:I've blocked this user for 31 hours. Best Girth Summit _(blether) 13:08, 23 August 2023 (UTC)

• Hi {{u|Girth Summit}}. Thank you for the update and for keeping a lookout. --Technopat (talk) 13:37, 23 August 2023 (UTC)

File:Information orange.svg Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at :User talk:Technopat. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Parmin khosravi (talk) 13:00, 23 August 2023 (UTC)

• No comment. --Technopat (talk) 13:37, 23 August 2023 (UTC)

lmao what i just put "hello page clearer" or something dumb like that it isnt vandalizing anything there's nothing there Keo Venzee (talk) 18:00, 7 September 2023 (UTC)

• No comment. --Technopat (talk) 19:33, 7 September 2023 (UTC)

Why did you revert my edit inserting the word "accolades"? Is that some kind of vandalism? 174.56.173.38 (talk) 02:47, 14 September 2023 (UTC)kolef174.56.173.38 (talk) 02:47, 14 September 2023 (UTC)

• Technopat, have fun answering that. Drmies (talk) 02:49, 14 September 2023 (UTC)

• [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3A174.56.173.38&diff=1175329907&oldid=1172594009 Replied]. --Technopat (talk) 09:05, 14 September 2023 (UTC)

Ατεκμηρίωτοι πίνακες 2A02:586:CC37:5935:539:4D3C:88E6:1464 (talk) 11:28, 15 September 2023 (UTC)

• No comment. --Technopat (talk) 11:32, 15 September 2023 (UTC)

Why do you commandeer the simple additions we make? Why do you care if a horrible photo is edited? Why do you know better than Scofield about himself, his life and career? Why do you remove any post 2007 information? You called him an idiot. He is not. It seems that you are decidedly trying to make him look bad. And much of what you have written is tainted with opinion rather than simple facts. What can we do to get you to back off? 2600:4040:946F:9C00:6CD7:DBB4:B7EC:E182 (talk) 18:02, 15 September 2023 (UTC)

• "You called him an idiot." Please note that I am being very, very careful not to lose my cool here, and giving you the benefit of the doubt, but if you continue to lie about my edits I shall request admin intervention. --Technopat (talk) 20:43, 15 September 2023 (UTC)

I seem to be very confused I don’t seem to understand how u think I vandalized Wikipedia by making a post and talking about Leonardo da Vinci's childhood.Could u possibly tell me how you think I “vandalized” Wikipedia.If so ty.ItsBabytomatoes (talk) 20:59, 20 September 2023 (UTC)

• [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AItsBabytomatoes&diff=1176331441&oldid=1176302822 Replied and apologised.] --Technopat (talk) 01:06, 21 September 2023 (UTC)

Hi, back in 2023 you have tagged the article I have written, Spanish succession issue of 1789. Could you please give some most representative samples, so that I could understand what is wrong with it? rgds, Dd1495 (talk) 06:11, 3 May 2024 (UTC)

Hi, this is an automated reminder as part of Global reminder bot to let you know that your WP:IPBE right which gave you the ability to bypass IP address blocks will expire on 14:43, 7 October 2024 (UTC). If your IP is still blocked (which you can test by trying to edit when logged-out), please renew by following the instructions at the IPBE page; otherwise, you do not need to do anything. To opt out of user right expiry notifications, add yourself to m:Global reminder bot/Exclusion. Leaderbot (talk) 08:51, 1 October 2024 (UTC)

30px

The redirect [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=President_of_Spain&redirect=no President of Spain] has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at {{slink|Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 November 9#President of Spain}} until a consensus is reached. — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (Goodbye!) 05:36, 9 November 2024 (UTC)

You revered my edit and said "Nowhere does the reference provided back up the content added" That is COMPLETELY False. And the info I provided is TRUE and ACCURATE. Wikipedia claims the Astrodome is the world's first domed stadium. It was opened in 1965. However, I made an edit and provided a source. My edit stated that the State Farm Center, a domed stadium, in Urbana, IL was opened in 1963. The reference I left was the actual weblink Provided by the University of Illinois provides official information on the State Farm Center and the opening date for the State Farm Center is right there in the text provided on the link. I suggest you do your research before you go policing what you think is credible references! Jnimee (talk) 04:29, 12 December 2024 (UTC)

• [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AJnimee&diff=1262617355&oldid=1026190070 Replied.] --Technopat (talk) 08:49, 12 December 2024 (UTC)

I don't agree with the vandalism but having a colored ribbon really is confusing now that Wikipedia shows you image previews of articles on mouseover. There's not really anything in the article body that would fit better up there, but I think it might be best to move the purple ribbon into the article body, even if that means not having a header photo at all. That might be best because it's such a personal and controversial subject. Bruhpedia (talk) 12:02, 12 December 2024 (UTC)

• [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3ABruhpedia&diff=1262640717&oldid=1258292841 Acknowledged receipt. Will reply asap.] --Technopat (talk) 12:54, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
• [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3ABruhpedia&diff=1262723359&oldid=1262640717 Replied (in full).] --Technopat (talk) 21:20, 12 December 2024 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Campaign of Gipuzkoa, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hugh Thomas.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:56, 8 January 2025 (UTC)

Please let me know if you see more from {{noping|217.178.105.8}}. It'll be a prompt block. DMacks (talk) 09:13, 19 January 2025 (UTC)

Thanks for the thanks for my edit here [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:71.178.3.180&diff=prev&oldid=1270715607]. I'm curious now: did you just trust me? _signed, Willondon (talk) 22:13, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

:The question of trust didn't enter it, I'm afraid... (you were faster off the mark). Kudos to you! Technopat (talk) 22:18, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

https://www.mauformayor.com/about-mau

Please refer to About candidate for proper title. Proper title for candidate is Former Wall Street Bond Trader. DogfishCowboy (talk) 00:09, 21 January 2025 (UTC)

• [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3ADogfishCowboy&diff=1270735797&oldid=1270734690 Replied.] --Technopat (talk) 00:21, 21 January 2025 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Timeline of the Peninsular War, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Santander.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:59, 25 January 2025 (UTC)

File:Ambox warning pn.svg

{{Quote box|quote=

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on :The Locos requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the {{Querylink|Special:Log|qs=type=delete&page=The+Locos|deleting administrator}}. NJZombie (talk) 00:48, 2 February 2025 (UTC)

I understand you. But if I am registered in Wikipedia, the system automatically removes my account. Thanks. (Sherzod Abduvaitov 88 (talk) 11:35, 8 February 2025 (UTC))

• [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3ASherzod_Abduvaitov_88&diff=1274623784&oldid=1274620498 Replied]. --Technopat (talk) 11:49, 8 February 2025 (UTC)

Why do you keep reverting my contribution to the Parmigiano Reggiano page? FrancioFr87 (talk) 20:45, 21 February 2025 (UTC)

• [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AFrancioFr87&diff=1276965586&oldid=1276964371 Replied.] --Technopat (talk) 20:53, 21 February 2025 (UTC)
• :Hello and thank you for the reply. Anyway I am not doing an edit war. In this scenario, you would be the one that started this. You reverted my contribution without an explanation. Also, you didn't answer my question. Reread the topic. FrancioFr87 (talk) 21:02, 21 February 2025 (UTC)
• [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AFrancioFr87&diff=1276968548&oldid=1276966347 Replied.] --Technopat (talk) 21:17, 21 February 2025 (UTC)
• :I'll explain you why.
• :I think it is indisputable that the cheese mentioned in the article is the one produced in Italy, consequently, the correct name is Parmigiano Reggiano.
• :It should also be remembered that Parmesan and Parmigiano Reggiano, as also stated on the article's discussion page, are two different things.
• :Parmigiano Reggiano is Parmesan, while Parmesan is not always Parmigiano Reggiano.
• :As someone suggested in the discussion page, there should be two distinct pages. One for Parmesan and one for Parmigiano Reggiano.
• :Furthermore, having reached the status quo does not mean that what has been decided is right. That said, I will probably open a discussion on the issue in the next few days and maybe edit the article again obviously adding the summary as you advised.
• :I kindly ask you not to take action in this case.
• :Thank you. FrancioFr87 (talk) 21:46, 21 February 2025 (UTC)
• [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AFrancioFr87&diff=1276973759&oldid=1276972226 Replied.] --Technopat (talk) 21:55, 21 February 2025 (UTC)

I urge you to review the information I have removed. My intention was not to act in bad faith but to address manifest inaccuracies.

Spain does not maintain official statistics on ethnic groups. The source cited, the Instituto Nacional de Estadística (INE), only provides data on the place of birth, which is not synonymous with ethnicity. A person can be born in Spain and belong to an ethnic group other than the Spanish one, and conversely, someone born outside Spain can be ethnically Spanish. The INE's data pertains solely to the birthplace of residents in Spain, not the country's ethnic composition.

Thank you for your understanding, and I apologize for any inconvenience caused.Avelumt (talk) 08:13, 22 February 2025 (UTC)

• [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AAvelumt&diff=1277209811&oldid=1276985330 Replied and apologised.] --Technopat (talk) 09:55, 23 February 2025 (UTC)

The talk puberty comment was bad and i shouldn’t said it but what about the other ones I read the rules and I’m n confused i get the Alex rider one bc it didn’t have sources but what about classes/ratings I’m confused about it as a whole is it just bc u think it shouldn’t get that rating or smth else I’m so confused about ratings bc I tested ga and it worked I changed it back immediately but I am so confused about the rules I’m new sorry if I’m asking a dumb question OrangeLolipopSnail (talk) 15:21, 6 March 2025 (UTC)

• [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AOrangeLolipopSnail&diff=1279102525&oldid=1279100084 Replied.] --Technopat (talk) 15:27, 6 March 2025 (UTC)

South Ruislip has a population of 16k in 2021 and the website I provided had sources is it bc I accidentally deleted the 2017 one I can add that back in if u want OrangeLolipopSnail (talk) 18:12, 8 March 2025 (UTC)

• [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AOrangeLolipopSnail&diff=1279461241&oldid=1279114145 Replied.] --Technopat (talk) 18:27, 8 March 2025 (UTC)

File:Information icon4.svg

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. 170.62.100.237 (talk) 12:02, 9 March 2025 (UTC)

Stop edit warring and take it to the talk page. ScrabbleTiles (talk) 12:32, 9 March 2025 (UTC)

• I was just going to thank you for intervening, but I now see that you have warned me below for edit-warring. As you may know, one of the exemptions from the edit-warring policy is "Reverting obvious vandalism—edits that any well-intentioned user would agree constitute vandalism, such as page blanking..." (WP:NOT3RR) I shall now stand down, happy in the knowledge that you have taken over the necessary revert effort. --Technopat (talk) 12:44, 9 March 2025 (UTC)
• :I’m not sure whether it is obvious vandalism. They have cited their reasons at the talk page of the article and I think it would be good if you went there to explain why you believe it is obvious vandalism. ScrabbleTiles (talk) 12:46, 9 March 2025 (UTC)
• I have zero interest in the article and therefore do not have the knowledge required to particpate in a discussion on how to improve it, which is what the talk page is for. The fact remains that one or several IPs and registered users have, over the past few days, repeatedly deleted the same perfectly well-referenced content, aka page blanking. --Technopat (talk) 12:52, 9 March 2025 (UTC)
• :I have no knowledge either. I was just stopping an unconstructive and time wasting edit war that was getting nowhere. The best approach is to take it to the talk page to give them a chance to voice their opinion on why they are doing it, not repeatedly revert their edits. ScrabbleTiles (talk) 12:55, 9 March 2025 (UTC)
• Page blanking is page blanking and repeatedly doing so, after having been warned about it is... But fine, as I write, the sockpuppet's version is currently up there and I really can't be bothered to sort it out, especially if it results in getting blocked for doing so. --Technopat (talk) 13:07, 9 March 2025 (UTC)
• :What do you mean? I have reinstated the old edits. ScrabbleTiles (talk) 13:08, 9 March 2025 (UTC)
• Sorry, I didn't see your question as I was editing elsewhere. At the time of writing my comment above, you still hadn't reinstated the edits, though I now see that you were obviously doing so at that time. Thank you. --Technopat (talk) 14:39, 9 March 2025 (UTC)

File:Ambox warning pn.svg You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. ScrabbleTiles (talk) 12:38, 9 March 2025 (UTC)

Just for the record, am placing here the two comments, with diffs, recently and incorrectly inserted under two unrelated threads above by an IP user:

[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3ATechnopat&diff=1279610609&oldid=1279609355 "I am correcting the misinformation concerning nationalities of people! You need to be aware that England is NOT an official sovereign country!"]

AND

[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Technopat&diff=next&oldid=1279610609 "I am correcting the misinformation concerning nationalities of people! You need to be aware that England is NOT an official sovereign country! arsehole".]

Other than placing them here in their correct order, no response is necessary. Technopat (talk) 15:20, 9 March 2025 (UTC)

Just to inform you that I tried to change "c.1500" to "1492" only once (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Spanish_Golden_Age&diff=prev&oldid=1279741967). All the other users who continue to revert you are not me. I am waiting for the edit warring to end to propose a solution. 2A01:E11:17:40B0:90E0:C664:1B72:FBD7 (talk) 12:27, 11 March 2025 (UTC)

You said those events aren't results of the Glorious Revolution. Are you a troll or did you fail history? 2601:940:C100:7AF0:88A:99AD:83CF:6762 (talk) 06:31, 13 March 2025 (UTC)

• Not gonna reply. We'll see how this plays out. --Technopat (talk) 09:41, 13 March 2025 (UTC)
• [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Glorious_Revolution&diff=prev&oldid=1280214094 For the record.] --Technopat (talk) 09:44, 13 March 2025 (UTC)

Why did you revert my edits on the 1A1 section? It was factual information and much needed cleanup. Is it a source issue? (164.154.253.88 (talk) 20:50, 19 March 2025 (UTC))

:I also noticed my last addition (it was an addition to my previous edits before I saw they were reverted) was also removed. I simply added that the 1A1 was an unlicensed variant. Why, exactly, was that removed? It's factual and sourced information that is elsewhere in the section. Since the 1A1 is the only FAL variant I can think of that is unlicensed it seems noteworthy to put that in the introductory sentence. (164.154.253.88 (talk) 21:00, 19 March 2025 (UTC))

• [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:164.154.253.88&oldid=1281353784 Replied.] --Technopat (talk) 21:33, 19 March 2025 (UTC)

I read your message on my talk page my friend and you know what? You are right, I guess that I wasn't thinking right when I did what I did, Take care: Tony the Marine (talk) 21:41, 19 March 2025 (UTC)

• [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AMarine_69-71&diff=1281357640&oldid=1281027568 Replied.] --Technopat (talk) 22:06, 19 March 2025 (UTC)

• [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Edit_warring&diff=prev&oldid=1281455728 "... Technopat replied 'in an unnecessarily condescending and uncivil way. This kind of hostility is disruptive...'".]

• The above comment, which if it were a true indictment of my behaviour here, should surely be enough to get me blocked for some other reason, was made by a member of the Arbitration Committee, an administrator, checkuser and oversighter. Not by any supposed "victim" of Technopat. The block itself I can cope with, as it's all part of the mindless stats., but that single comment, gratuitous, has managed to do what no amount of vandalism, trolling, flaming or personal attacks has been able to do over all these years and that is question why I should bother helping out on this project. I thought I was thick-skinned enough not to let these things get to me... From now on, I may just potter around for a while, meekly fixing the innumerable substandard articles on my watchlist, but as far as helping out at Recent changes, etc., and actively reverting all that messy stuff that goes down there, I don't wanna get my fingers burned. I apologise to all my fellow patrollers and rollbackers out there for leaving them in the lurch, but I simply CBA. --Technopat (talk) 09:06, 26 March 2025 (UTC)

::You being blocked was not a "mindless stat", it was done to prevent further disruption. An editor started a discussion on the talk page to try to determine why you were repeatedly reverting their edits, as you had provided no explanation why you were reverting them. Your response to their attempt at discussion was not to explain the reason for your edit warring, but this comment. This behavior runs contrary to several Wikipedia policies, particularly those discussed at WP:5P4. There is nothing gratuitous about pointing that out when reviewing the report that you yourself made. You specifically asked administrators to examine the edits, and so they were examined at your request. You were blocked for making seven reverts in under an hour, going far beyond WP:3RR. You were not blocked for the incivility, which did not factor into the block and was not part of the block log specifically because Wikipedia:Civility#Blocking for incivility notes that {{tq|Users should be clearly warned, in most circumstances, before being blocked for incivility, and should be allowed sufficient time to retract, reword or explain uncivil comments.}} This is why I left a comment for that issue specifically rather than factoring it into any blocks made, in the hopes that pointing out the issue would prevent it from reoccurring. - Aoidh (talk) 18:43, 26 March 2025 (UTC)

:::Thank you for responding. I don’t have time to reply right now but shall try to do so some time today. Technopat (talk) 05:57, 27 March 2025 (UTC)

Why are you reverting people's edits? I'm 17 and I'm new to Wikipedia, and as far as I know you've been making unhelpful edits. Technomatt (talk) 13:09, 21 March 2025 (UTC)

• No comment. --Technopat (talk) 16:07, 21 March 2025 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Hibernia Regiment (Spain), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Levies.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:55, 22 March 2025 (UTC)

Your edits did not help the community. I'm confident that mine helped way better 2601:280:5000:8650:4CA5:35AA:8D47:F96 (talk) 07:11, 27 March 2025 (UTC)

• No comment. --Technopat (talk) 07:39, 29 March 2025 (UTC)

I was only editing what was true. KirstoffLazzaar (talk) 21:57, 4 April 2025 (UTC)

• [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AKirstoffLazzaar&diff=1283988713&oldid=1283988389 Just for the record.] --Technopat (talk) 19:45, 5 April 2025 (UTC)

Why did you expand those articles if most of what you wrote, respectfully, is wrong? The tercio of idiáquez is nowhere addressed as the "tercio of Lombardía." The tercio is also not the predecessor to the Regimiento de Infantería 'Principe' nº 2 or nº 3. The source you cited for that doesn't even state Idiáquez once.

The tercio of idiáquez was raised in 1633 and was composed of 19 companies of gathered Spanish veterans and 7 companies of Spanish veterans from the tercio viejo de Lombardía, totaling 1,800 men in 26 companies. It was never called the "tercio de Lombardía" and was simply incorporated into the tercio viejo de Lombardía and other tercios viejos in Flanders in 1635 when the army arrived. The tercio of Fuenclara also faced the same fate in 1635, being incorporated into the other native Spanish tercios.

Due to this I don't believe these articles were even worth expanding in the first place as there's not much to add other that what you wrote which, with all due respect, isn't true. Unless you want to correct what you wrote and expand the articles Tercio of Idiáquez and Tercio of Fuenclara in another way, I'd suggest either leaving the articles as they were before @Ravenswing -- Bubba6t3411 (talk) 13:53, 17 April 2025 (UTC)

• Interestin' take. Will go over my sources and get back to you on this asap. In the meantime, you yourself point out that "the tercio of idiáquez (sic)... was composed of [among others] 7 companies of Spanish veterans from the tercio viejo de Lombardía,...". Likewise, as I go to great extent to point out, regiments are subject to numerous name changes throughout [their] history and the historiography is often careless when referring to military units and their commanders, whiuch make the tracing of amalgamations complex. As for your suggestions of "leaving the articles as they were before or deleting them", that does seem to me to be a bit of a cop-out, as it would erase from Wikipedia an important part of European military history, given that they have been tagged for deletion. --Technopat (talk) 18:45, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
• :Although they incorporated 7 companies from the tercio viejo de Lombardía, the tercio de Idiáquez was still composed of 19 companies not from the tercio viejo de Lombardía. Idiáquez's tercio was never referred to as the "tercio de Lombardía" or the "tercio viejo de Lombardía" because the tercio viejo de Lombardía itself was already deployed in Flanders, along with some other native Spanish tercios. These extra companies that were incorporated were simply either the companies left behind in Italy as garrison or newly raised companies of the largest [native] Spanish tercio (that is, the tercio viejo de Lombardía) and is not to be confused with any other tercios.
• :I suppose if you truly want to expand the articles Tercio of Idiáquez and Tercio of Fuenclara, you could write more in detail about their roles in battle. For this I would recommend de Aedo's work from 1635 (there are revised/translated versions published more recently), which provides you with a primary source that goes into the most detail. The Spanish title is El Memorable Y Glorioso Viaje Del Infante Cardenal D. Fernando De Austria. -- Bubba6t3411 (talk) 08:40, 18 April 2025 (UTC)