:Hindu temple architecture

{{multiple image|perrow=2|total_width=450|caption_align=center

| align = right

| direction =horizontal

| header=Temple of Vāsudeva in Besnagar (2nd century BCE)

| image1 = Besnagar lower levels BSN 3 next to the Heliodorus pillar.jpg

| caption1 = Initial excavations

| image2 = Elliptic plan of the Temple next to the Heliodorus pillar, Besnagar.jpg

| caption2 = Elliptic plan of the Temple

| footer_align = center

| footer=Excavation of the huge Temple of Vāsudeva next to the Heliodorus pillar in Besnagar.{{cite book |title=Approaches to Iconology |date=1985 |publisher=Brill Archive |isbn=978-90-04-07772-0 |page=41 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=UesUAAAAIAAJ&pg=PA41 |language=en}} The Temple measured 30x30 meters, and the walls were 2.4 meters thick. Pottery remains assigns the site to the 2nd century BCE.{{cite book |last1=Ghosh |first1=A. |title=Indian Archaeology 1963-64, A Review |date=1967 |publisher=ASI |page=17 |doi=10.5281/zenodo.3416858 |url=https://zenodo.org/record/3416858}} Further excavations also revealed the outline of a smaller elliptic temple structure, which was probably destroyed by the end of the 3rd century BCE.{{cite book |title=Indian Archaeology -- A Review 1964-65 |date=1965 |pages=19–20, BSN-3 |doi=10.5281/zenodo.1442629 |url=https://zenodo.org/record/1442629|author1=Archaeological Survey Of India }} The platform and the base of the Heliodorus pillar are visible in the immediate background.

}}

Remains of early elliptical shrines discovered in Besnagar (3rd-2nd century BCE){{cite book |last1=Shaw |first1=Julia |title=Buddhist Landscapes in Central India: Sanchi Hill and Archaeologies of Religious and Social Change, C. Third Century BC to Fifth Century AD |date=31 August 2013 |publisher=Left Coast Press |isbn=978-1-61132-344-3 |page=40 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=jzkyBgAAQBAJ&pg=PA40 |language=en}} and Nagari (1st century BCE), may be the earliest known Hindu temple structures, associated to the early Bhagavata tradition, a precursor of Vaishnavism.{{cite book |last1=Mishra |first1=Susan Verma |last2=Ray |first2=Himanshu Prabha |title=The Archaeology of Sacred Spaces: The temple in western India, 2nd century BCE–8th century CE |date=2016 |publisher=Routledge |isbn=978-1-317-19374-6 |page=5 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=CtDLDAAAQBAJ&pg=PA5 |language=en}}{{cite journal |last1=Ray |first1=Himanshu Prabha |title=The Apsidal Shrine in Early Hinduism: Origins, Cultic Affiliation, Patronage |journal=World Archaeology |date=2004 |volume=36 |issue=3 |page=348 |doi=10.1080/0043824042000282786 |jstor=4128336 |s2cid=161072766 |url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/4128336 |issn=0043-8243}}{{cite book |last1=Shaw |first1=Julia |title=Buddhist Landscapes in Central India: Sanchi Hill and Archaeologies of Religious and Social Change, C. Third Century BC to Fifth Century AD |date=31 August 2013 |publisher=Left Coast Press |isbn=978-1-61132-344-3 |pages=176–177 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=jzkyBgAAQBAJ&pg=PA176 |language=en}} In Tamil Nadu, the earliest version of the Murugan Temple, Saluvankuppam, north-facing and in brick, appears to date from between the 3rd century BCE and 3rd century CE.{{cite news|title=New finds of old temples enthuse archaeologists|author=N. Ramya|date=1 August 2010|url=https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/chennai/New-finds-of-old-temples-enthuse-archaeologists/articleshow/6242174.cms|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120915014729/http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2010-08-01/chennai/28281794_1_inscription-shore-temple-oldest-temples|url-status=live|work=The Times of India|archive-date=15 September 2012}}

In Besnagar, the temple structures have been found in conjonction with the Heliodorus pillar dedicated to Vāsudeva.{{cite journal |last1=Kumar |first1=Ashish |title=Heliodorous Pillar of Besnagar- Past and Present (pp. 13-19) |journal=Heritage and Us |date=2013 |volume=Year 2 |issue=1 |pages=15–16 |url=https://www.academia.edu/3360811}} The archaeologists found an ancient elliptical foundation, extensive floor and plinth produced from burnt bricks. Further, the foundations for all the major components of a Hindu temple – garbhagriha (sanctum), pradakshinapatha (circumambulation passage), antarala (antechamber next to sanctum) and mandapa (gathering hall) – were found.{{cite journal |last1=Khare |first1=M. D. |title=THE HELIODORUS PILLAR—A FRESH APPRAISAL, BY JOHN IRWIN ( AARP—ART AND ARCHAEOLOGY RESEARCH PAPERS—DECEMBER 1974 ) A REJOINDER |journal=Proceedings of the Indian History Congress |date=1975 |volume=36 |pages=92–93 |jstor=44138838 |url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/44138838 |issn=2249-1937}} These sections had a thick support base for their walls. These core temple remains cover an area of 30 x 30 m.{{Cite book|title=Indian Archaeology: A Review 1963-64|last=A.|first=Gosh|publisher=Archaeological survey of India|location=Calcutta|pages=17}} The sections had post-holes, which likely contained the wooden pillars for the temple superstructure above. In the soil were iron nails that likely held together the wooden pillars. The superstructure of the temple was likely made of wood, mud and other perishable materials.

The ancient temple complex discovered in Nagari (Chittorgarh, Rajasthan) – about 500 kilometers to the west of Vidisha, has a sub-surface structure nearly identical to that of the Besnagar temple. The structure is also associated to the cult of Vāsudeva and Saṃkarṣaṇa, and dated to the 1st century BCE.{{cite book |last1=Shaw |first1=Julia |title=Buddhist Landscapes in Central India: Sanchi Hill and Archaeologies of Religious and Social Change, C. Third Century BC to Fifth Century AD |date=31 August 2013 |publisher=Left Coast Press |isbn=978-1-61132-344-3 |page=264, note 14; 265, note 10 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=jzkyBgAAQBAJ&pg=PA264 |language=en}}

{{multiple image|perrow=2/2|total_width=400|caption_align=center

| align = right

| direction =horizontal

| header=Hindu temples of the Gupta period

| alt =

| image1 = Tigowa 1999 Kankali-Devi-Tempel.jpg

| caption1 = Kankali Devi temple in Tigawa, 5th century

| image4 = Deogarh01.jpg

| caption4 = Dashavatara Temple, Deogarh, early 6th century

| image3 = Gupt kalin mandir bhitargaon (detail).jpg

| caption3 = Hindu temple of Bhitargaon, late 5th century.{{cite book |last1=Harle |first1=James C. |title=The Art and Architecture of the Indian Subcontinent |date=January 1994 |publisher=Yale University Press |isbn=978-0-300-06217-5 |page=116 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=LwcBVvdqyBkC&pg=PA116 |language=en}}

| image2 = Vishnu_temple_mandapa_at_Eran,_Madhya_Pradesh.jpg

| caption2 = Vishnu temple in Eran, late 5th century.

| footer=

}}

Though there are very few remains of stone Hindu temples before the Gupta dynasty in the 5th century CE, there may be earlier structures constructed from timber-based architecture. The rock-cut Udayagiri Caves (401 CE) are among the most important early sites, built with royal sponsorship, recorded by inscriptions, and with impressive sculpture.Harle (1994), 87-100; Michell (1988), 18 The earliest preserved Hindu temples are simple cell-like stone temples, some rock-cut and others structural, as at Temple 17 at Sanchi.{{cite journal |last=Meister |first=Michael W. |date=1988–1989 |title=Prāsāda as Palace: Kūṭina Origins of the Nāgara Temple |journal=Artibus Asiae |volume=49 |issue=3–4 |pages=254–256 |doi=10.2307/3250039 |jstor=3250039}} By the 6th or 7th century, these evolved into high shikhara stone superstructures. However, there is inscriptional evidence such as the ancient Gangadhara inscription from about 424 CE, states Meister, that towering temples existed before this time and these were possibly made from more perishable material. These temples have not survived.

Examples of early major North Indian temples that have survived after the Udayagiri Caves in Madhya Pradesh include those at Tigawa,Michell (1990), 192 Deogarh, Parvati Temple, Nachna (465),Michael Meister (1987), Hindu Temple, in The Encyclopedia of Religion, editor: Mircea Eliade, Volume 14, Macmillan, {{ISBN|0-02-909850-5}}, page 370 Bhitargaon, the largest Gupta brick temple to survive,Michell (1990), 157; Michell (1988), 96 Lakshman Brick Temple, Sirpur (600-625 CE); Rajiv Lochan temple, Rajim (7th-century).{{cite journal |last=Meister |first=Michael W. |date=1988–1989 |title=Prāsāda as Palace: Kūṭina Origins of the Nāgara Temple |journal=Artibus Asiae |volume=49 |issue=3–4 |pages=254–280 |doi=10.2307/3250039 |jstor=3250039}} Gop Temple in Gujarat (c. 550 or later) is an oddity, with no surviving close comparator.Harle, 136-138; Michell (1988), 90, 96-98

No pre-7th century CE South Indian free-standing stone temples have survived. Examples of early major South Indian temples that have survived, some in ruins, include the diverse styles at Mahabalipuram, from the 7th and 8th centuries. According to Meister, the Mahabalipuram temples are "monolithic models of a variety of formal structures all of which already can be said to typify a developed "Dravida" (South Indian) order". They suggest a tradition and a knowledge base existed in South India by the time of the early Chalukya and Pallava era when these were built. In the Deccan, Cave 3 of the Badami cave temples was cut out in 578 CE, and Cave 1 is probably slightly earlier.Michell (1990), 349 Other examples are found in Aihole and Pattadakal.Michael W. Meister and M.A. Dhaky (1983), South India: Lower Dravidadesa, Encyclopaedia of Indian Temple Architecture, Vol. I, Part I, Princeton University Press, {{ISBN|978-0691784021}}, pages 30-53

{{multiple image|perrow = 2|total_width=400

| image1 = Bhima Ratha Pancha Rathas Mahabalipuram India - panoramio (1).jpg

| image2 = Ganesha Ratha Mahabalipuram Sep22 A7C 02582.jpg

| footer = Bhima Ratha and Ganesha Ratha temples at Mahabalipuram, ca, 600s. }}

By about the 7th century most main features of the Hindu temple were established along with theoretical texts on temple architecture and building methods. From between about the 7th and 13th centuries a large number of temples and their ruins have survived (though far fewer than once existed). Many regional styles developed, very often following political divisions, as large temples were typically built with royal patronage. The Vesara style originated in the region between the Krishna and Tungabhadra rivers that is contemporary north Karnataka. According to some art historians, the roots of Vesara style can be traced to the Chalukyas of Badami (500-753AD) whose Early Chalukya or Badami Chalukya architecture built temples in a style that mixed some features of the nagara and the dravida styles, for example using both the northern shikhara and southern vimana type of superstructure over the sanctum in different temples of similar date, as at Pattadakal. This style was further refined by the Rashtrakutas of Manyakheta (750-983AD) in sites such as Ellora. Though there is clearly a good deal of continuity with the Badami or Early Chalukya style,Michell, 149 other writers only date the start of Vesara to the later Western Chalukyas of Kalyani (983-1195 AD),Harle, 254 in sites such as Lakkundi, Dambal, Itagi, and Gadag,Harle, 256-261 and continued by the Hoysala empire (1000-1330 AD).

File:8th century Shiva spearing evil demon at Virupaksha Shaiva temple, Pattadakal Hindu monuments Karnataka.jpg Hindu monuments, 7th-8th century.]]

File:Ellora cave16 001.jpg , remarkably carved out of one single rock was built by Rashtrakuta king Krishna I (r. 756–773 CE)Lisa Nadine Owen, Beyond Buddhist and Brahmanical Activity: The Place of the Jain Rock-Cut Excavations at Ellora, PhD thesis 2006, University of Texas at Austin p. 255]]

The earliest examples of Pallava architecture are rock-cut temples dating from 610 to 690 CE and structural temples between 690 and 900 CE. The greatest accomplishments of the Pallava architecture are the rock-cut Group of Monuments at Mahabalipuram at Mahabalipuram, a UNESCO World Heritage Site, including the Shore Temple. This group includes both excavated pillared halls, with no external roof except the natural rock, and monolithic shrines where the natural rock is entirely cut away and carved to give an external roof. Early temples were mostly dedicated to Shiva. The Kailasanatha temple also called Rajasimha Pallaveswaram in Kanchipuram built by Narasimhavarman II also known as Rajasimha is a fine example of the Pallava style temple.

Western Chalukya architecture linked between the Badami Chalukya Architecture of the 8th century and the Hoysala architecture popularised in the 13th century.An important period in the development of Indian art (Kamath 2001, p115){{cite web|title=History of Karnataka – Chalukyas of Kalyani |url=http://www.ourkarnataka.com/history.htm |author=Arthikaje |publisher=1998–2000 OurKarnataka.Com, Inc |access-date=2006-11-10 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20061104095148/http://www.ourkarnataka.com/history.htm |archive-date=4 November 2006}} The art of Western Chalukyas is sometimes called the "Gadag style" after the number of ornate temples they built in the Tungabhadra – Krishna River doab region of present-day Gadag district in Karnataka.{{cite web|title=Temples of Karnataka, Kalyani Chalukyan temples|url=http://www.templenet.com/Karnataka/kalyani_chalukya.html|author=Kannikeswaran|publisher=webmaster@templenet.com,1996–2006|access-date=2006-12-16}} Their temple building reached its maturity and culmination in the 12th century, with over a hundred temples built across the deccan, more than half of them in present-day Karnataka. Apart from temples they are also well known for ornate stepped wells (Pushkarni) which served as ritual bathing places, many of which are well preserved in Lakkundi. Their stepped well designs were later incorporated by the Hoysalas and the Vijayanagara empire in the coming centuries.

In the north, Muslim invasions from the 11th century onwards reduced the building of temples, and saw the loss of many existing ones. The south also witnessed Hindu-Muslim conflict that affected the temples, but the region was relatively less affected than the north.{{sfn|George Michell|1995|pp=9-10, Quote: "The era under consideration opens with an unprecedented calamity for Southern India: the invasion of the region at the turn of the fourteenth century by Malik Kafur, general of Alauddin, Sultan of Delhi. Malik Kafur's forces brought to an abrupt end all of the indigenous ruling houses of Southern India, not one of which was able to withstand the assault or outlive the conquest. Virtually every city of importance in the Kannada, Telugu and Tamil zones succumbed to the raids of Malik Kafur; forts were destroyed, palaces dismantled and temple sanctuaries wrecked in the search for treasure. In order to consolidate the rapidly won gains of this pillage, Malik Kafur established himself in 1323 at Madurai (Madura) in the southernmost part of the Tamil zone, former capital of the Pandyas who were dislodged by the Delhi forces. Madurai thereupon became the capital of the Ma'bar (Malabar) province of the Delhi empire."}} In late 14th century, the Hindu Vijayanagara Empire came to power and controlled much of South India. During this period, the distinctive very tall gopuram gatehouse, (actually a late development, from the 12th century or later), was typically added to older large temples.Michell (1988), 18, 50-54, 89, 149-155; Harle (1994), 335

{{multiple image

| direction = horizontal

| width = 200

| height = 001

| align = right

| footer = Prambanan in Java, Indonesia (9th century) and Angkor Wat in Cambodia (12th century), examples of Southeast Asian Hindu temple architecture. Both temples were modelled after Mount Meru in Hindu cosmology.

| image1 = Prambanan Temple Yogyakarta Indonesia.jpg

| image2 = Angkor (II).jpg

}}

Possibly the oldest Hindu temples in Southeast Asia dates back to 2nd century BCE from the Funan site of Oc Eo in the Mekong Delta. They were probably dedicated to a sun god, Shiva and Vishnu. The temple were constructed using granite blocks and bricks, one with a small stepped pond.{{Cite journal|last1=Sen|first1=Võ Văn|last2=Thắng|first2=Đặng Văn|date=2017-10-06|title=Recognition of Oc Eo Culture Relic in Thoai Son District an Giang Province, Vienam|url=http://asrjetsjournal.org/index.php/American_Scientific_Journal/article/view/3393|journal=American Scientific Research Journal for Engineering, Technology, and Sciences (ASRJETS)|language=en|volume=36|issue=1|pages=271–293|issn=2313-4402}}

File:Salah Satu Upacara Besar Di Pura Agung Besakih.jpg ceremony at Besakih Temple in Bali, Indonesia.]]

The earliest evidence trace to Sanskrit stone inscriptions found on the islands and the mainland Southeast Asia is the Võ Cạnh inscription of Champa dated to 2nd or 3rd century CE in Vietnam or in Cambodia between the 4th and 5th century CE.{{cite book |author=Ooi |first=Keat Gin |author-link=Keat Gin Ooi |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=QKgraWbb7yoC&pg=PA587 |title=Southeast Asia: A Historical Encyclopedia, from Angkor Wat to East Timor |publisher=ABC-CLIO |year=2004 |isbn=978-1-57607-770-2 |pages=587–588}}{{refn|group=note|Richard Salomon dates the earliest Cambodian Sanskrit inscriptions to the 5th century.{{cite book|author=Richard Salomon|title=Indian Epigraphy: A Guide to the Study of Inscriptions in Sanskrit, Prakrit, and the other Indo-Aryan Languages|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=XYrG07qQDxkC |year=1998|publisher=Oxford University Press|isbn=978-0-19-535666-3|pages=155–157}}}} Prior to the 14th-century local versions of Hindu temples were built in Myanmar, Malaysia, Indonesia, Thailand, Cambodia, Laos and Vietnam. These developed several national traditions, and often mixed Hinduism and Buddhism. Theravada Buddhism prevailed in many parts of the South-East Asia, except Malaysia and Indonesia where Islam displaced them both.Michell (1988), 18-19, 54, 159-182{{cite book|author=Richard Salomon| editor= Hans Bakker|title=The History of Sacred Places in India As Reflected in Traditional Literature: Papers on Pilgrimage in South Asia|chapter-url= https://books.google.com/books?id=McwUAAAAIAAJ| chapter= Indian Tirthas in Southeast Asia| year= 1990|publisher= BRILL Academic|isbn= 978-90-04-09318-8|pages=160–176}}, Quote: "In the Indianized regions of ancient southeast Asia, comprising the modern nations of Burma, Thailand, Malaysia, Cambodia, Laos, Vietnam and Indonesia (...)"

Hindu temples in Southeast Asia developed their own distinct versions, mostly based on Indian architectural models, both North Indian and South Indian styles.{{sfn|George Michell|1988|pp=159-161}} However, the Southeast Asian temple architecture styles are different, and there is no known single temple in India that can be the source of the Southeast Asian temples. According to Michell, it is as if the Southeast Asian architects learned from "the theoretical prescriptions about temple building" from Indian texts, but never saw one. They reassembled the elements with their own creative interpretations. The Hindu temples found in Southeast Asia are more conservative and far more strongly link the Mount Meru-related cosmological elements of Indian thought than the Hindu temples found in the subcontinent.{{sfn|George Michell|1988|pp=159-161}} Additionally, unlike the Indian temples, the sacred architecture in Southeast Asia associated the ruler (devaraja) with the divine, with the temple serving as a memorial to the king as much as being house of gods.{{sfn|George Michell|1988|pp=159-161}} Notable examples of Southeast Asian Hindu temple architecture are the Shivaist Prambanan Trimurti temple compound in Java, Indonesia (9th century),{{Cite web|url=http://borobudurpark.com/en/temple/prambanan-2/|title=Prambanan - Taman Wisata Candi|website=borobudurpark.com|language=en-GB|access-date=2017-12-15}} and the Vishnuite Angkor Wat in Cambodia (12th century).{{Cite web|url=https://whc.unesco.org/en/list/668|title=Angkor|last=Centre|first=UNESCO World Heritage|website=whc.unesco.org|language=en|access-date=2017-12-15}}

File:17th century Odisha palm leaf manuscript Hindu temple architecture 2.jpg.]]

A Hindu temple is a symmetry-driven structure, with many variations, on a square grid of padas, depicting perfect geometric shapes such as circles and squares. Susan Lewandowski states that the underlying principle in a Hindu temple is built around the belief that all things are one and that everything is connected. A temple, states Lewandowski, "replicates again and again the Hindu beliefs in the parts mirroring, and at the same time being, the universal whole" like an "organism of repeating cells".Susan Lewandowski, The Hindu Temple in South India, in Buildings and Society: Essays on the Social Development of the Built Environment, Anthony D. King (Editor), {{ISBN|978-0710202345}}, Routledge, Chapter 4{{rp|68, 71}} The pilgrim is welcomed through mathematically structured spaces, a network of art, pillars with carvings and statues that display and celebrate the four important and necessary principles of human life—the pursuit of artha (prosperity, wealth), the pursuit of kama (desire), the pursuit of dharma (virtues, ethical life) and the pursuit of moksha (release, self-knowledge).Alain Daniélou (2001), The Hindu Temple: Deification of Eroticism, Translated from French to English by Ken Hurry, {{ISBN|0-89281-854-9}}, pp 101-127Samuel Parker (2010), Ritual as a Mode of Production: Ethnoarchaeology and Creative Practice in Hindu Temple Arts, South Asian Studies, 26(1), pp 31-57; Michael Rabe, Secret Yantras and Erotic Display for Hindu Temples, (Editor: David White), {{ISBN|978-8120817784}}, Princeton University Readings in Religion (Motilal Banarsidass Publishers), Chapter 25, pp 435-446

At the centre of the temple, typically below and sometimes above or next to the deity, is mere hollow space with no decoration, symbolically representing Purusa, the Supreme Principle, the sacred Universal, one without form, which is present everywhere, connects everything, and is the essence of everyone. A Hindu temple is meant to encourage reflection, facilitate purification of one's mind, and trigger the process of inner realization within the devotee. The specific process is left to the devotee's school of belief. The primary deity of different Hindu temples varies to reflect this spiritual spectrum.

The appropriate site for a Mandir, suggest ancient Sanskrit texts, is near water and gardens, where lotus and flowers bloom, where swans, ducks and other birds are heard, where animals rest without fear of injury or harm. These harmonious places were recommended in these texts with the explanation that such are the places where gods play, and thus the best site for Hindu temples.

While major Hindu mandirs are recommended at sangams (confluence of rivers), river banks, lakes and seashore, the Brhat Samhita and Puranas suggest temples may also be built where a natural source of water is not present. Here too, they recommend that a pond be built preferably in front or to the left of the temple with water gardens. If water is neither present naturally nor by design, water is symbolically present at the consecration of temple or the deity. Temples may also be built, suggests Visnudharmottara in Part III of Chapter 93,Stella Kramrisch, The Hindu Temple, Vol 1, Motilal Banarsidass, {{ISBN|978-81-208-0222-3}}, page 5-6 inside caves and carved stones, on hill tops affording peaceful views, mountain slopes overlooking beautiful valleys, inside forests and hermitages, next to gardens, or at the head of a town street.

In practice most temples are built as part of a village or town.Michell (1988), 50 Some sites such as the capitals of kingdoms and those considered particularly favourable in terms of sacred geography had numerous temples. Many ancient capitals vanished and the surviving temples are now found in a rural landscape; often these are the best-preserved examples of older styles. Aihole, Badami, Pattadakal and Gangaikonda Cholapuram are examples.

File:64 grid Manduka design Hindu Temple Floor Plan Vastu Purusa Mandala Ancient Architecture.svg

The design, especially the floor plan, of the part of a Hindu temple around the sanctum or shrine follows a geometrical design called vastu-purusha-mandala. The name is a composite Sanskrit word with three of the most important components of the plan. Mandala means circle, Purusha is universal essence at the core of Hindu tradition, while Vastu means the dwelling structure.Susan Lewandowski, The Hindu Temple in South India, in Buildings and Society: Essays on the Social Development of the Built Environment, Anthony D. King (Editor), {{ISBN|978-0710202345}}, Routledge, pp 68-69 Vastupurushamandala is a yantra.Stella Kramrisch (1976), The Hindu Temple Volume 1 & 2, {{ISBN|81-208-0223-3}} The design lays out a Hindu temple in a symmetrical, self-repeating structure derived from central beliefs, myths, cardinality and mathematical principles.{{cite journal |last=Meister |first=Michael |date=1983 |title=Geometry and Measure in Indian Temple Plans: Rectangular Temples |journal=Artibus Asiae |volume=44 |issue=4 |pages=266–296 |doi=10.2307/3249613 |jstor=3249613}}

The four cardinal directions help create the axis of a Hindu temple, around which is formed a perfect square in the space available. The circle of mandala circumscribes the square. The square is considered divine for its perfection and as a symbolic product of knowledge and human thought, while circle is considered earthly, human and observed in everyday life (moon, sun, horizon, water drop, rainbow). Each supports the other. The square is divided into perfect square grids. In large temples, this is often a 8×8 or 64-grid structure. In ceremonial temple superstructures, this is an 81 sub-square grid. The squares are called ‘‘padas’’.In addition to square (4) sided layout, Brhat Samhita also describes Vastu and mandala design principles based on a perfect triangle (3), hexagon (6), octagon (8) and hexadecagon (16) sided layouts, according to Stella Kramrisch. The 49 grid design is called Sthandila and of great importance in creative expressions of Hindu temples in South India, particularly in ‘‘Prakaras’’. The square is symbolic and has Vedic origins from fire altar, Agni. The alignment along cardinal direction, similarly is an extension of Vedic rituals of three fires. This symbolism is also found among Greek and other ancient civilizations, through the gnomon. In Hindu temple manuals, design plans are described with 1, 4, 9, 16, 25, 36, 49, 64, 81 up to 1024 squares; 1 pada is considered the simplest plan, as a seat for a hermit or devotee to sit and meditate on, do yoga, or make offerings with Vedic fire in front. The second design of 4 padas has a symbolic central core at the diagonal intersection, and is also a meditative layout. The 9 pada design has a sacred surrounded centre, and is the template for the smallest temple. Older Hindu temple vastumandalas may use the 9 through 49 pada series, but 64 is considered the most sacred geometric grid in Hindu temples. It is also called Manduka, Bhekapada or Ajira in various ancient Sanskrit texts. Each pada is conceptually assigned to a symbolic element, sometimes in the form of a deity or to a spirit or apasara. The central square(s) of the 64 is dedicated to the Brahman (not to be confused with Brahmin), and are called Brahma padas.

In a Hindu temple's structure of symmetry and concentric squares, each concentric layer has significance. The outermost layer, Paisachika padas, signify aspects of Asuras and evil; the next inner concentric layer is Manusha padas signifying human life; while Devika padas signify aspects of Devas and good. The Manusha padas typically houses the ambulatory. The devotees, as they walk around in clockwise fashion through this ambulatory to complete Parikrama (or Pradakshina), walk between good on inner side and evil on the outer side. In smaller temples, the Paisachika pada is not part of the temple superstructure, but may be on the boundary of the temple or just symbolically represented.

The Paisachika padas, Manusha padas and Devika padas surround Brahma padas, which signifies creative energy and serves as the location for temple's primary idol for darsana. Finally at the very centre of Brahma padas is Garbhagruha(Garbha- Centre, gruha- house; literally the centre of the house) (Purusa Space), signifying Universal Principle present in everything and everyone. The spire of a Hindu temple, called Shikhara in north India and Vimana in south India, is perfectly aligned above the Brahma pada(s).

{{multiple image

| direction = horizontal

| width = 200

| footer = A Hindu temple has a Shikhara (Vimana or Spire) that rises symmetrically above the central core of the temple. These spires come in many designs and shapes, but they all have mathematical precision and geometric symbolism. One of the common principles found in Hindu temple spires is circles and turning-squares theme (left), and a concentric layering design (right) that flows from one to the other as it rises towards the sky.{{cite journal |last=Meister |first=Michael W. |date=March 2006 |title=Mountain Temples and Temple-Mountains: Masrur |journal=Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians |volume=65 |issue=1 |pages=26–49 |doi=10.2307/25068237 |jstor=25068237}}

| image1 = Circle and squares in Hindu temple Spires Vastu Purusa Mandala.svg

| image2 = Hindu temple Spire design principle concentric circles squares Vastu Purusa Mandala without label.svg

}}

Beneath the mandala's central square(s) is the space for the formless shapeless all pervasive all connecting Universal Spirit, the Purusha. This space is sometimes referred to as garbha-griya (literally womb house) – a small, perfect square, windowless, enclosed space without ornamentation that represents universal essence. In or near this space is typically a murti. This is the main deity image, and this varies with each temple. Often it is this idol that gives it a local name, such as Vishnu temple, Krishna temple, Rama temple, Narayana temple, Siva temple, Lakshmi temple, Ganesha temple, Durga temple, Hanuman temple, Surya temple, and others. It is this garbha-griya which devotees seek for ‘‘darsana’’ (literally, a sight of knowledge,{{sfn|Stella Kramrisch|1976|p=8}} or vision).

Above the vastu-purusha-mandala is a high superstructure called the shikhara in north India, and vimana in south India, that stretches towards the sky. Sometimes, in makeshift temples, the superstructure may be replaced with symbolic bamboo with few leaves at the top. The vertical dimension's cupola or dome is designed as a pyramid, conical or other mountain-like shape, once again using principle of concentric circles and squares (see below). Scholars such as Lewandowski state that this shape is inspired by cosmic mountain of Mount Meru or Himalayan Kailasa, the abode of gods according to its ancient mythology.{{rp|69–72}}

In larger temples, the outer three padas are visually decorated with carvings, paintings or images meant to inspire the devotee. In some temples, these images or wall reliefs may be stories from Hindu Epics, in others they may be Vedic tales about right and wrong or virtues and vice, in some they may be idols of minor or regional deities. The pillars, walls and ceilings typically also have highly ornate carvings or images of the four just and necessary pursuits of life—kama, artha, dharma, and moksa. This walk around is called pradakshina.

Large temples also have pillared halls called mandapa. One on the east side, serves as the waiting room for pilgrims and devotees. The mandapa may be a separate structure in older temples, but in newer temples this space is integrated into the temple superstructure. Mega temple sites have a main temple surrounded by smaller temples and shrines, but these are still arranged by principles of symmetry, grids and mathematical precision. An important principle found in the layout of Hindu temples is mirroring and repeating fractal-like design structure,Trivedi, K. (1989). Hindu temples: models of a fractal universe. The Visual Computer, 5(4), 243-258 each unique yet also repeating the central common principle, one which Susan Lewandowski refers to as “an organism of repeating cells”.Susan Lewandowski, The Hindu Temple in South India, in Buildings and Society: Essays on the Social Development of the Built Environment, Anthony D. King (Editor), {{ISBN|978-0710202345}}, Routledge, pp 71-73

;Exceptions to the square grid principle

Predominant number of Hindu temples exhibit the perfect square grid principle.{{cite journal |last=Meister |first=Michael W. |date=April–June 1979 |title=Maṇḍala and Practice in Nāgara Architecture in North India |journal=Journal of the American Oriental Society |volume=99 |issue=2 |pages=204–219 |doi=10.2307/602657 |jstor=602657}} However, there are some exceptions. For example, the Teli ka Mandir in Gwalior, built in the 8th century CE is not a square but is a rectangle consisting of stacked squares. Further, the temple explores a number of structures and shrines in 1:1, 1:2, 1:3, 2:5, 3:5 and 4:5 ratios. These ratios are exact, suggesting the architect intended to use these harmonic ratios, and the rectangle pattern was not a mistake, nor an arbitrary approximation. Other examples of non-square harmonic ratios are found at Naresar temple site of Madhya Pradesh and Nakti-Mata temple near Jaipur, Rajasthan. Michael Meister states that these exceptions mean the ancient Sanskrit manuals for temple building were guidelines, and Hinduism permitted its artisans flexibility in expression and aesthetic independence.

The Hindu text Sthapatya Veda describes many plans and styles of temples of which the following are found in other derivative literature: Chaturasra (square), Ashtasra (octagonal), Vritta (circular), Ayatasra (rectangular), Ayata Ashtasra (rectangular-octagonal fusion), Ayata Vritta (elliptical), Hasti Prishta (apsidal), Dvayasra Vrita (rectangular-circular fusion); in Tamil literature, the Prana Vikara (shaped like a Tamil Om sign, 20px) is also found. Methods of combining squares and circles to produce all of these plans are described in the Hindu texts.{{sfn| Vinayak Bharne| Krupali Krusche|2014|pp=66-69 with Figure 5.8}}

File:Plan of Srirangam Temple. Burgess,1910.jpg|Srirangam Ranganathaswamy temple, cross section and plan (1910 sketch).

File:1910 sketches, Gondeshwar temple Sinnar, Nashik temple overview, cross section and plan.jpg|Nashik Maharashtra temple, cross section and plan (1910 sketch)

File:1910 sketch of plan, Govinda Deva temple at Vrindavan, Uttar Pradesh.jpg|Vrindavan Uttar Pradesh temple plan

File:1910 sketch of plan, Kandariya Mahadeva Temple, Khajuraho.jpg|Khajuraho Madhya Pradesh temple plan

File:1910 sketch of plan, Jagannath Temple, Puri Odisha.jpg|Puri Odisha temple complex plan

File:1910 sketch of plan, Rajarani Temple, Bhubaneswar Odisha.jpg|Bhubneshwar Odisha, a smaller temple plan

File:12th century Halebid Shiva temple plan annotated.jpg|Halebidu Karnataka temple plan

File:10th to 13th century Chidambaram Nataraja Temple plan.svg|Chidambaram Tamil Nadu temple plan

File:1915 sketch of a Tamil Hindu temple complex architecture.jpg|Thiruvallur Sri Veera Raghavaswamy temple, Tamil Hindu temple complex.

File:Chitragupta temple belonging to Western Group of Temples at Khajuraho in Madhya Pradesh.jpg|Mandapa and Shikara of Khajuraho Group of Monuments, ca. 885 CE and 1000 CE.

The temples were built by guilds of architects, artisans and workmen. Their knowledge and craft traditions, states Michell, were originally preserved by the oral tradition, later with palm-leaf manuscripts.Michell (1988), 55–56 with Figure 20 The building tradition was typically transmitted within families from one generation to the next, and this knowledge was jealously guarded. The guilds were like a corporate body that set rules of work and standard wages. These guilds over time became wealthy, and themselves made charitable donations as evidenced by inscriptions. The guilds covered almost every aspect of life in the camps around the site where the workmen lived during the period of construction, which in the case of large projects might be several years.Michell (1988), 55-57

The work was led by a chief architect (sutradhara). The construction superintendent was equal in his authority. Other important members were stonemason chief and the chief image-maker who collaborated to complete a temple. The sculptors were called shilpins. Women participated in temple building, but in lighter work such as polishing stones and clearing. Hindu texts are inconsistent about which caste did the construction work, with some texts accepting all castes to work as a shilpin.Stella Kramrisch (1994), Exploring India's Sacred Art, Editor: Stella Miller, Motilal Banarsidass, {{ISBN|978-81-208-1208-6}}, pages 60–64 The Brahmins were the experts in art theory and guided the workmen when needed. They also performed consecration rituals of the superstructure and in the sanctum.

In the earliest periods of Hindu art, from about the 4th century to about the 10th century, the artists had considerable freedom and this is evidenced in the considerable variations and innovations in images crafted and temple designs. Later, much of this freedom was lost as iconography became more standardized and the demand for iconometry consistency increased. This "presumably reflected the influence of Brahman theologians" states Michell, and the "increasing dependence of the artist upon the brahmins" on suitable forms of sacred images. The "individual pursuit of self-expression" in a temple project was not allowed and instead, the artist expressed the sacred values in the visual form through a temple, for the most part anonymously.

File:Door Desavatara Deogarh.jpg sculpture at Deogarh, completed about 500 CE.]]

The sponsors used contracts for the building tasks.Michell (1988), 54-55, 57 Though great masters probably had assistants to help complete principal images in a temple, the reliefs panels in a Hindu temple were "almost certainly the inspiration of a single artist".Michell (1988), 57

Along with guilds, surviving texts suggest that several schools of Hindu temple architecture had developed in ancient India. Each school developed its own gurukuls (study centres) and texts. Of these, state Bharne and Krusche, two became most prominent: the Vishwakarma school and the Maya (Devanagari: मय not to be pronounced as Maayaa) school.{{sfn| Vinayak Bharne| Krupali Krusche|2014|pp=66-72}}{{cite book|author=Madhusudan A. Dhaky|title=The Indian Temple Forms in Karṇāṭa Inscriptions and Architecture|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=VyW32NwcMr4C |year=1977|publisher=Abhinav Publications|isbn=978-81-7017-065-5|pages=1–19}} The Vishwakarma school is credited with treatises, terminology and innovations related to the Nagara style of architecture, while the Maya school with those related to the Dravida style.{{sfn| Vinayak Bharne| Krupali Krusche|2014|pp=66-72}}{{cite book|author=Tarapada Bhattacharyya|title=The Canons of Indian Art: Or, a Study on Vāstuvidyā|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=cGAPNQAACAAJ|year=1986|publisher=Firma KLM|isbn=978-0-8364-1618-3|pages=i–v, 87–99, 201–204, 291–292}} The style now called Vesara bridges and combines elements of the Nagara and the Dravida styles, it probably reflects one of the other extinct schools.{{cite book|author=Tarapada Bhattacharyya|title=The Canons of Indian Art: Or, a Study on Vāstuvidyā|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=cGAPNQAACAAJ|year=1986|publisher=Firma KLM|isbn=978-0-8364-1618-3|pages=155–163}}

Some scholars have questioned the relevance of these texts, whether the artists relied on śilpa śāstras theory and Sanskrit construction manuals probably written by Brahmins, and did these treatises precede or follow the big temples and ancient sculptures therein. Other scholars question whether big temples and complex symmetric architecture or sculpture with consistent themes and common iconography across distant sites, over many centuries, could have been built by artists and architects without adequate theory, shared terminology and tools, and if so how.{{sfn| Vinayak Bharne| Krupali Krusche|2014|pp=66-72}} According to Adam Hardy – an architecture historian and professor of Asian Architecture, the truth "must lie somewhere in between".{{cite journal | last=Hardy | first=Adam | title=Drāvida Temples in the Samarānganasūtradhāra | journal=South Asian Studies | volume=25 | issue=1 | year=2009 | doi=10.1080/02666030.2009.9628698 | pages=41–62| s2cid=15290721 | url=http://orca.cf.ac.uk/13911/1/Dravida%20Temples%20in%20the%20Samarangana.pdf }} According to George Michell – an art historian and professor specializing in Hindu Architecture, the theory and the creative field practice likely co-evolved, and the construction workers and artists building complex temples likely consulted the theoreticians when they needed to.

File:Architecture of the Khajuraho temples.jpgThe ancient Hindu texts on architecture such as Brihatsamhita and others, states Michell, classify temples into five orders based on their typological features: Nagara, Dravida, Vesara, ellipse and rectangle. The plan described for each include square, octagonal and apsidal. Their horizontal plan regulates the vertical form. Each temple architecture in turn has developed its own vocabulary, with terms that overlap but do not necessarily mean exactly the same thing in another style and may apply to a different part of the temple.{{sfn|George Michell|1988|p=88}} Following a general historical division, the early Hindu temples, up to the 7th or 8th century, are often called classical or ancient temples, while those after the classical period to the 12th or 13th century are sometimes referred to as medieval. However, this division does not reflect a major break in Hindu architecture, which continued to evolve gradually across these periods.{{sfn|George Michell|1988|p=88-89}}

The style of Hindu temple architecture is not only the result of the theology, spiritual ideas, and the early Hindu texts but also a result of innovation driven by regional availability of raw materials and the local climate.{{sfn|George Michell|1988|p=88-89}} Some materials of construction were imported from distant regions, but much of the temples were built from readily available materials. In some regions, such as in South Karnataka, the local availability of soft stone led to Hoysala architects to innovate architectural styles that are difficult with hard crystalline rocks.{{sfn|George Michell|1988|p=88-89}} In other places, artists used to cut granite or other stones to build temples and create sculptures. Rock faces allowed artists to carve cave temples or a region's rocky terrain encouraged monolithic rock-cut temple architecture. In regions where stones were unavailable, brick temples flourished. Hindu temple architecture has historically been affected by the building material available in each region, its "tonal value, texture and structural possibilities" states Michell.{{sfn|George Michell|1988|p=88-89}}

{{Main|Dravidian architecture}}

File:Varadaraja Perumal Temple Kanchipuram (31).jpg Gopuram and the temple tank Anandasaras Pushkarini]]

Dravidian architecture is an architectural idiom in Hindu temple architecture that emerged from South India, reaching its final form by the 1500 CE. It is seen in Hindu temples, and the most distinctive difference from north Indian styles is the use of a shorter and more pyramidal tower over the garbhagriha or sanctuary called a vimana, where the north has taller towers, usually bending inwards as they rise, called shikhara. However, for modern visitors to larger temples the dominating feature is the high Gopura or gatehouse at the edge of the compound; large temples have several, dwarfing the vimana; these are a much more recent development. There are numerous other distinct features such as the dvarapalakas – twin guardians at the main entrance and the inner sanctum of the temple and goshtams – deities carved in niches on the outer side walls of the garbhagriha.

Mentioned as one of three styles of temple building in the ancient book Vastu shastra, the majority of the existing structures are located in the Southern Indian states of Karnataka, Tamil Nadu, Kerala, Andhra Pradesh, Telangana, some parts of Maharashtra, Odisha and Sri Lanka.{{Cite book|last=Fergusson|first=James|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=mmtDAQAAMAAJ&q=dravidian+architecture+in+maharashtra|title=The Rock-cut Temples of India: Illustrated by Seventy-four Photographs Taken on the Spot by Major Gill|date=1864|publisher=J. Murray|language=en}}{{Cite book|last=Hardy|first=Adam|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=ofUVAQAAIAAJ&q=dravidian+architecture+in+maharashtra|title=The Temple Architecture of India|date=2007|publisher=Wiley|isbn=978-0-470-02827-8|language=en}} Various kingdoms and empires such as the Satavahanas, the Vakatakas of Vidarbha, the Cholas, the Chera, the Kakatiyas, the Reddis, the Pandyas, the Pallavas, the Gangas, the Kadambas, the Rashtrakutas, the Chalukyas, the Hoysalas and Vijayanagara Empire among others have made substantial contribution to the evolution of the Dravida architecture.

Of the different styles of temple architecture in India, the Nagara architecture of northern India and the Dravidian architecture of southern India are most common.Hardy (1995), 5; Michell (1988), 88-89 Other styles are also found. For example, the rainy climate and the materials of construction available in Bengal, Kerala, Java and Bali Indonesia have influenced the evolutions of styles and structures in these regions.{{sfn|George Michell|1988|pp=89, 155-158}} At other sites such as Ellora and Pattadakal, adjacent temples may have features drawing from different traditions, as well as features in a common style local to that region and period. In modern era literature, many styles have been named after the royal dynasties in whose territories they were built.Michell (1988), 155-182; Hardy (1995), 5-10

The architecture of the rock-cut temples, particularly the rathas, became a model for south Indian temples.{{Cite web|url=http://www.bl.uk/onlinegallery/onlineex/apac/photocoll/t/019pho0000472s1u00027000.html|title= The Rathas, monolithic [Mamallapuram]| access-date=23 October 2012|publisher= Online Gallery of British Library}} Architectural features, particularly the sculptures, were widely adopted in South Indian, Cambodian, Annamese and Javanese temples.{{Cite web|url=https://whc.unesco.org/en/list/249/|title=Group of Monuments at Mahabalipuram|access-date=23 October 2012|publisher=UNESCO.org}} Descendants of the sculptors of the shrines are artisans in contemporary Mahabalipuram.{{cite book|first1=Pippa de |last1=Bruyn|first2=Keith |last2=Bain|first3=David |last3=Allardice|author4=Shonar Joshi|title=Frommer's India|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=qG-9cwHOcCIC&pg=PA333|access-date=7 February 2013|date=18 February 2010|publisher=John Wiley & Sons|isbn=978-0-470-64580-2|pages=333–}}

The Badami Chalukya Architecture style originated by 5th century in Aihole and was perfected in Pattadakal and Badami.

{{multiple image

| align = right

| direction = horizontal

| header_align = center

| header = Chalukya Architecture of temples at Aihole and Pattadakal

|image1 = Mallikarjuna temple complex at Aihole.jpg

|width1 = 200

|height1 = 100

|caption1 = Mallikarjuna temple complex at Aihole, is a historic site of ancient and medieval era Buddhist, Hindu and Jain monuments in north Karnataka, India dated from the sixth century through the twelfth century CE.{{cite book|author=Himanshu Prabha Ray|title=Archaeology and Text: The Temple in South Asia|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=QgFPAQAAIAAJ|year=2010|publisher=Oxford University Press|isbn=978-0-19-806096-3|pages=17–18, 27}}{{sfn|Heather Elgood|2000|p=151}}{{cite book|author=Jeffery D. Long|author-link=Jeffery D. Long|title=Historical Dictionary of Hinduism|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=ZkkFCwAAQBAJ&pg=PA29|year=2011|publisher=Scarecrow|isbn=978-0-8108-7960-7|page=29}}, Quote: "AIHOLE. Pronounced "Eye-ho-lé", village in northern Karnataka that, from the fourth to the sixth centuries CE, was a major city (...)"

| image2 = Virupaksha temple at Pattadakal.jpg

| width2 = 200

| alt2 =

| caption2 = The Virupaksha temple (or Lokesvara temple) at Pattadakal, built by queen Lokamahadevi (queen of Badami Chalukya King Vikramaditya II) around 740 CE, now a World Heritage Site.

}}

Between 500 and 757 CE, Badami Chalukyas built Hindu temples out of sandstone cut into enormous blocks from the outcrops in the chains of the Kaladgi hills.

In Aihole, known as the "Cradle of Indian architecture," there are over 150 temples scattered around the village. The Lad Khan Temple is the oldest. The Durga Temple is notable for its semi-circular apse, elevated plinth and the gallery that encircles the sanctum sanctorum. A sculpture of Vishnu sitting atop a large cobra is at Hutchimali Temple. The Ravalphadi cave temple celebrates the many forms of Shiva. Other temples include the Konthi temple complex and the Meguti Jain temple.

Pattadakal is a World Heritage Site, where one finds the Virupaksha temple; it is the biggest temple, having carved scenes from the great epics of the Ramayana and the Mahabharata. Other temples at Pattadakal are Mallikarjuna, Kashivishwanatha, Galaganatha and Papanath.

{{Further|Bengal temple architecture}}

Several styles of temple architecture developed in Bengal. Notable temple architectural styles of Bengal are the Chala, Ratna and Dalan temples.McCutchion, David J., Late Mediaeval Temples of Bengal, first published 1972, reprinted 2017, pp. 1–14, 19–22. The Asiatic Society, Kolkata, {{ISBN| 978-93-81574-65-2}}.{{cite book |last1=Becker-Ritterspach |first1=Raimund Otto Artur |title=Ratna style Temples with an Ambulatory: Selected temple concepts in Bengal and the Kathmandu Valley |url=https://himalbooks.com/product/ratna-style-temples-with-an-ambulatory-selected-temple-concepts-in-bengal-and-the-kathmandu-valley/ |date=2016 |publisher=Himal Books |location=Kathmandu, Nepal |isbn=978-9937-597-29-6 |edition=First |access-date=8 June 2023}} Chala-style is a hut with a sloping roof, which follows the pattern of huts in most villages of Bengal. Ratna-style originated in Bengal from the 15th to 16th centuries, under the Mallabhum kingdom (also called Malla dynasty). One of the most prominent features of the Chala and Ratna style is the terracotta artwork on the temple walls. The Dalan-style is flat-roofed temples with their heavy cornices on S-curved brackets, and this style was later influenced by European ideas in the 19th century.

The prominent examples of Chala-style are Siddheshwari Kali Temple of Kalna City and Palpara Terracotta Temple of Palpara. One of the prominent example of Ratna-style is Ramchandraji temple at Guptipara. The Sharabhuja Gauranga temple at Panchrol is an example of Dalan-style.

File:Charchala temple at Palpara in Nadia district 01.jpg|Chala-style (Charchala) temple at Palpara in Nadia district.

File:Ram Chandraji temple of Guptipara in Hooghly district 01.jpg|Ek-ratna Ramchandraji temple at Guptipara, Hooghly district

File:Dakshineswar Kali Temple (7169302531).jpg|Naba-ratna Dakshineswar Kali Temple near Kolkata, North 24 Parganas district.

File:Sharabhuja Gauranga Dalan temple at Panchrol under Purba Medinipur district 03.jpg|Dalan-style Sharabhuja Gauranga temple at Panchrol, Purba Medinipur district.

{{more citations needed section|date=December 2017}}

The Gadag style of architecture is also called Western Chalukya architecture. The style flourished for 150 years (1050 to 1200 CE); in this period, about 50 temples were built. Some examples are the Saraswati temple in the Trikuteshwara temple complex at Gadag, the Doddabasappa Temple at Dambal, the Kasivisvesvara Temple at Lakkundi, and the Amriteshwara temple at Annigeri. which is marked by ornate pillars with intricate sculpture. This style originated during the period of the Kalyani Chalukyas (also known as Western Chalukya) Someswara I.

Image:Stepped Diamond floorplan of Dattatreya Temple at Chattarki in Gulbarga district.svg|Stepped floorplan of Dattatreya Temple (one side of the shrine) with five projections at Chattarki in Gulbarga district, 12th century CE

Image:Shrine at Kasivisvesvara temple in Lakkundi .jpg|Shrine wall and superstructure in Kasivisvesvara temple at Lakkundi

Image:Pillars at Sarasvati Temple in Gadag.JPG|Ornate Gadag style pillars at Sarasvati Temple, Trikuteshwara temple complex at Gadag

Image:Itagi Mahadeva temple.JPG| Mahadeva Temple at Itagi, Koppal district in Karnataka, also called Devalaya Chakravarti,Cousens (1926), p. 101Kamath (2001), pp. 117–118 1112 CE, an example of dravida articulation with a nagara superstructure.

{{Further|Kalinga architecture}}

{{multiple image

| align = right

| direction = horizontal

| header_align = center

| header = The three types of Deulas

|image1 = Nágara sikhara felépítése.svg

|width1 = 120

|caption1 = Rekha and Pidha Deula of the Konark Sun Temple

| image2 = Vaitala Mandira.jpg

| caption2 = Khakhara Deula of the Vaital Deula

| width2 = 178

}}

{{more citations needed section|date=December 2017}}

The design which flourished in eastern Indian state of Odisha and Northern Andhra Pradesh are called Kalinga style of architecture. The style consists of three distinct type of temples namely Rekha Deula, Pidha Deula and Khakhara Deula. Deula means "temple" in the Odia language. The former two are associated with Vishnu, Surya and Shiva temple while the third is mainly with Chamunda and Durga temples. The Rekha deula and Khakhara deula houses the sanctum sanctorum while the Pidha Deula constitutes outer dancing and offering halls.

The prominent examples of Rekha Deula are Lingaraja Temple of Bhubaneswar and Jagannath Temple of Puri. One of the prominent example of Khakhara Deula is Vaital Deula. The Mukhasala structure that remains of the Konark Sun Temple is an example of Pidha Deula.

File:Navlakha arial view 02 (cropped).jpg, Gujarat, 12th century]]

Māru-Gurjara architecture, or Solaṅkī style,Hegewald, note 3. Mitchell (1988) uses "Solanki style", while Harle is reluctant to tie the style to a specific name. is a style of north Indian temple architecture that originated in Gujarat and Rajasthan from the 11th to 13th centuries, under the Chaulukya dynasty (or Solaṅkī dynasty).Mitchell (1988), 123; Hegewald Although originating as a regional style in Hindu temple architecture, it became especially popular in Jain temples and, mainly under Jain patronage, later spread across India and to diaspora communities around the world.Hegewald

On the exteriors, the style is distinguished from other north Indian temple styles of the period in "that the external walls of the temples have been structured by increasing numbers of projections and recesses, accommodating sharply carved statues in niches. These are normally positioned in superimposed registers, above the lower bands of moldings. The latter display continuous lines of horse riders, elephants, and kīrttimukhas. Hardly any segment of the surface is left unadorned." The main shikhara tower usually has many urushringa subsidiary spirelets on it, and two smaller side-entrances with porches are common in larger temples.

File:BAPS Houston Aarti.jpg temple in Houston, Texas (2004)]]

Interiors are if anything even more lavishly decorated, with elaborate carving on most surfaces. In particular, Jain temples often have small low domes carved on the inside with a highly intricate rosette design. Another distinctive feature is "flying" arch-like elements between pillars, touching the horizontal beam above in the centre, and elaborately carved. These have no structural function, and are purely decorative. The style developed large pillared halls, many open at the sides, with Jain temples often having one closed and two pillared halls in sequence on the main axis leading to the shrine.Hegewald; Harle, 219–220

The style mostly fell from use in Hindu temples in its original regions by the 13th century, especially as the area had fallen to the Muslim Delhi Sultanate by 1298. But, unusually for an Indian temple style, it continued to be used by Jains there and elsewhere, with a notable "revival" in the 15th century.Harle, 239–240; Hegewald Since then it has continued in use in Jain and some Hindu temples, and from the late 20th century has spread to temples built outside India by both the Jain diaspora and Hindus. Some buildings mix Māru-Gurjara elements with those of local temple styles and modern international ones. Generally, where there is elaborate carving, often still done by craftsmen from Gujarat or Rajasthan, this has more ornamental and decorative work than small figures. In particular the style is used in India and abroad by the Swaminarayan sect. Sometimes the Māru-Gurjara influence is limited to the "flying arches" and mandapa ceiling rosettes, and a preference for white marble.

This style is one of the oldest styles of temples on the Asian continent and derives its shape from Himalayan fir trees. The ground floor is typically the residence of the deity, either Hindu or Buddhist, while the upper floors are used as storage for religious items. There is gajura at the top which is the combination of a lotus base, an upside-down vase, a triangle and a kalasha. The pagoda style flourished in Nepal from the beginning of the 13th century. The temples of Pashupatinath, Changunarayan, Chandeshwori and Banepa are excellent examples of ancient architecture in the pagoda style. The Malla period produced various pagoda-style temples and palaces such as Nayatapola, Dattatraya of Bhaktapur, Kasthamandap of Kathmandu, Taleju Temple, Vajrabarahi, Vajrayogini.{{Cite journal |last=Shokoohy |first=Mehradad |date=November 1996 |title=Nepal: a guide to the art and architecture of the Kathmandu Valley. By Michael Hutt, with contributions by David N. Gellner, Axel Michaels, Greta Rana and Govinda Tandan. pp. 240, 16 col. pl., 263 bl. & wh. photos, 11 figs, 22 maps and plans. Gartmore, Stirling, Paul Strachan. Kiscadale, 1994. £25.00. |url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s1356186300008129 |journal=Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society |volume=6 |issue=3 |pages=454–455 |doi=10.1017/s1356186300008129 |issn=1356-1863}}

{{see also | Architecture_of_India#inf | l1= Influence of Indian architecture on other nations | Indianization of Southeast Asia | Greater India | Indosphere | Indomania | History of Indian influence on Southeast Asia }}

Architecture of the southeast nations was inspired by the Indian temple architecture,{{Cite web|url=http://www.bl.uk/onlinegallery/onlineex/apac/photocoll/t/019pho0000472s1u00027000.html|title= The Rathas, monolithic [Mamallapuram]| access-date=23 October 2012|publisher= Online Gallery of British Library}} as those were Indianised as part of the Greater India.

{{further|Art of Champa#Temples of brick | l1 = Champa architecture}}

File:Tháp Po Klaung Garai, Phan Rang, Ninh Thuận.JPG near Phan Rang includes all the buildings typical of a Cham temple. From left to right one can see the gopura, the saddle-shaped kosagrha, and mandapa attached to the kalan tower.]]

Between the 6th and the 16th century, the Kingdom of Champa flourished in present-day central and southern Vietnam. Unlike the Javanese that mostly used volcanic andesite stone for their temples, and Khmer of Angkor which mostly employed grey sandstones to construct their religious buildings, the Cham built their temples from reddish bricks. The most important remaining sites of Cham bricks temple architecture include Mỹ Sơn near Da Nang, Po Nagar near Nha Trang, and Po Klong Garai near Phan Rang.{{citation needed|date=November 2017}}

Typically, a Cham temple complex consisted of several different kinds of buildings.Tran Ky Phuong, Vestiges of Champa Civilization. They are kalan, a brick sanctuary, typically in the form of a tower with garbahgriha used to host the murti of deity. A mandapa is an entry hallway connected with a sanctuary. A kosagrha or "fire-house" is a temple construction typically with a saddle-shaped roof, used to house the valuables belonging to the deity or to cook for the deity. The gopura was a gate-tower leading into a walled temple complex. These building types are typical for Hindu temples in general; the classification is valid not only for the architecture of Champa, but also for other architectural traditions of Greater India.{{citation needed|date=November 2017}}

{{further|Candi of Indonesia|Indonesian architecture|Balinese temple}}

{{multiple image|align = right|perrow = 2|total_width=400

| header_align = center

| header = Prambanan, an example of Indonesian temple architecture

| image1 = Shiva Temple of Prambanan in Java Indonesia.jpg

| image2 = Prambanan Cross Section Shiva.svg

| image3 = Prambanan Temple Compound Map en.svg

| image4 = Prambanan Plain en.svg

| footer = Prambanan temple (Shivagrha) of Central Java, an example of the 9th century Indonesian Javanese Hindu temple architecture with mandala layout and prasad tower crowned with stylized ratna-vajra.

}}

Temples are called candi ({{IPA|id|ˈtʃandi|pron}}) in Indonesia, whether it is Buddhist or Hindu. A candi refers to a structure based on the Indian type of single-celled shrine, with a pyramidal tower above it (Meru tower in Bali), and a portico for entrance,Philip Rawson: The Art of Southeast Asia mostly built between the 7th to 15th centuries.{{harvp|Soekmono|1995|p=1}} In Hindu Balinese architecture, a candi shrine can be found within a pura compound. The best example of Indonesian Javanese Hindu temple architecture is the 9th century Prambanan (Shivagrha) temple compound, located in Central Java, near Yogyakarta. This largest Hindu temple in Indonesia has three main prasad towers, dedicated to Trimurti gods. Shiva temple, the largest main temple is towering to 47 metre-high (154 ft).

The term "candi" itself is believed was derived from Candika, one of the manifestations of the goddess Durga as the goddess of death.{{cite book | last =Soekmono | first =Dr R.| title =Pengantar Sejarah Kebudayaan Indonesia 2 | publisher =Penerbit Kanisius | year =1973 | location =Yogyakarta, Indonesia| pages =81 | isbn = 978-979-413-290-6}}

The candi architecture follows the typical Hindu architecture traditions based on Vastu Shastra. The temple layout, especially in central Java period, incorporated mandala temple plan arrangements and also the typical high towering spires of Hindu temples. The candi was designed to mimic Meru, the holy mountain the abode of gods. The whole temple is a model of Hindu universe according to Hindu cosmology and the layers of Loka.{{harvp|Sedyawati|2013|p=4}}

The candi structure and layout recognize the hierarchy of the zones, spanned from the less holy to the holiest realms. The Indic tradition of Hindu-Buddhist architecture recognize the concept of arranging elements in three parts or three elements. Subsequently, the design, plan and layout of the temple follows the rule of space allocation within three elements; commonly identified as foot (base), body (centre), and head (roof). They are Bhurloka represented by the outer courtyard and the foot (base) part of each temples, Bhuvarloka represented by the middle courtyard and the body of each temples, and Svarloka which symbolized by the roof of Hindu structure usually crowned with ratna (sanskrit: jewel) or vajra.{{citation needed|date=November 2017}}

{{further|Khmer architecture}}

{{multiple image

| direction = horizontal

| width = 200

| align = right

| footer = A diagram map of Angkor Wat reveal the concentric square galleries. On the right is an aerial view of the central structure of Angkor Wat, in front of it lies the cruciform terrace.

| image1 = Angkor Wat M3.png

| image2 =

}}

Before the 14th century, the Khmer Empire flourished in present-day Cambodia with its influence extended to most of mainland Southeast Asia. Its great capital, Angkor ({{langx|km|អង្គរ}}, "Capital City", derived from Sanskrit "nagara"), contains some of the most important and the most magnificent example of Khmer temple architecture. The classic style of Angkorian temple is demonstrated by the 12th century Angkor Wat. Angkorian builders mainly used sandstone and laterite as temple building materials.

The main superstructure of typical Khmer temple is a towering prasat called prang which houses the garbhagriha inner chamber, where the murti of Vishnu or Shiva, or a lingam resides. Khmer temples were typically enclosed by a concentric series of walls, with the central sanctuary in the middle; this arrangement represented the mountain ranges surrounding Mount Meru, the mythical home of the gods. Enclosures are the spaces between these walls, and between the innermost wall and the temple itself. The walls defining the enclosures of Khmer temples are frequently lined by galleries, while passage through the walls is by way of gopuras located at the cardinal points. The main entrance usually adorned with elevated causeway with cruciform terrace.Glaize, Monuments of the Angkor Group, p.27.

The Hindu texts on temple architecture have an extensive terminology. Most terms have several different names in the various Indian languages used in different regions of India, as well as the Sanscrit names used in ancient texts. A few of the more common terms are tabulated below, mostly in their Sanscrit/Hindi forms:

File:1834 sketch of elements in Hindu temple architecture, single storey gopura.jpg|Single storey gopura (Dravidian architecture)

File:1834 sketch of elements in Hindu temple architecture, two storey gopura.jpg|Two storey gopura (Dravidian architecture)

File:1834 sketch of pillar elements in Hindu temple architecture, 03.jpg|Pillar elements (shared by Nagara and Dravidian)

File:1834 sketch of athisthana, base elements in Hindu temple architecture.jpg|Athisthana architectural elements of a Hindu temple

File:1834 sketch of prastaras, entablature elements in Hindu temple architecture.jpg|Entablature elements

File:1834 sketch of elements in Hindu temple architecture, four storey vimana.jpg|A vimana with mandapam elements (Dravidian architecture)

{{commons category|Temple architecture of India}}

• Temple tank
• Vedic altars
• Indonesian architecture, Candi of Indonesia
• Rock-cut architecture
• Indian rock-cut architecture
• Architecture of Angkor
• Hemadpanthi architecture Style
• Dhvajastambha (flagstaff)

{{reflist|group=note}}

{{reflist|30em}}

• {{citation|author=Prasanna Kumar Acharya|title=An encyclopaedia of Hindu architecture|year=2010|publisher=Oxford University Press (Republished by Motilal Banarsidass)|url= https://archive.org/stream/encyclopaediaofh07achauoft#page/n9/mode/2up | isbn=978-81-7536-534-6}}
• {{cite book|author=Prasanna Kumar Acharya|title=A Dictionary of Hindu Architecture: Treating of Sanskrit Architectural Terms with Illustrative Quotations |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=rbayQwAACAAJ|year=1997|publisher=Oxford University Press (Reprinted in 1997 by Motilal Banarsidass)|isbn=978-81-7536-113-3}}
• {{cite book|author=Prasanna Kumar Acharya|title=Hindu Architecture in India and Abroad|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=Jw79PAAACAAJ|year=1996|publisher=Laurier|isbn=978-81-215-0732-5}}
• {{citation|author1=Vinayak Bharne|author2=Krupali Krusche|title=Rediscovering the Hindu Temple: The Sacred Architecture and Urbanism of India|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=CGukBgAAQBAJ |year=2014|publisher=Cambridge Scholars Publishing|isbn=978-1-4438-6734-4}}
• {{cite book|author=Alice Boner|title=Principles of Composition in Hindu Sculpture: Cave Temple Period|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=doQLZ21CGScC|year=1990|publisher=Motilal Banarsidass |isbn=978-81-208-0705-1}}
• {{citation|author1=Alice Boner|author2=Sadāśiva Rath Śarmā|title=Śilpa Prakāśa |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=itQUAAAAIAAJ|year=2005|publisher=Brill Academic (Reprinted by Motilal Banarsidass)|isbn=978-81-208-2052-4}}
• {{cite book|author1=A.K. Coomaraswamy|author2=Michael W. Meister|title=Essays in Architectural Theory|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=5B1QAAAAMAAJ|year=1995|publisher=Indira Gandhi National Centre for the Arts|isbn=978-0-19-563805-9}}
• Dehejia, V. (1997). Indian Art. Phaidon: London. {{ISBN|0-7148-3496-3}}.
• {{cite book |author=Heather Elgood |title=Hinduism and the Religious Arts |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=cj2tAwAAQBAJ |year=2000 |publisher=Bloomsbury Academic |isbn=978-0-304-70739-3}}
• {{citation|author=Adam Hardy|title=Indian Temple Architecture: Form and Transformation |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=aU0hCAS2-08C|year=1995|publisher=Abhinav Publications|isbn=978-81-7017-312-0}}
• {{cite book|author=Adam Hardy|title=The Temple Architecture of India|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=ofUVAQAAIAAJ |year=2007|publisher=Wiley|isbn=978-0-470-02827-8}}
• {{cite book|author=Adam Hardy|title=Theory and Practice of Temple Architecture in Medieval India: Bhoja's Samarāṅgaṇasūtradhāra and the Bhojpur Line Drawings|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=_oADrgEACAAJ|year=2015|publisher=Indira Gandhi National Centre for the Arts|isbn=978-93-81406-41-0}}
• Hardy, Adam (2007). The Temple Architecture of India, Wiley: Chichester. {{ISBN|978-0-470-02827-8}}
• {{Cite journal|last=Hegewald|first=Julia A. B.|title=The International Jaina Style? Māru-Gurjara Temples Under the Solaṅkīs, throughout India and in the Diaspora|url=https://quod.lib.umich.edu/a/ars/13441566.0045.005?view=text;rgn=main|journal=Ars Orientalis|volume=45|doi=10.3998/ars.13441566.0045.005|issn=2328-1286|year=2011|doi-access=free}}
• Harle, J.C., The Art and Architecture of the Indian Subcontinent, 2nd edn. 1994, Yale University Press Pelican History of Art, {{ISBN|0300062176}}
• {{cite book|author1=Knut A. Jacobsen|author2=Helene Basu|author3=Angelika Malinar|display-authors=etal|title=Brill's Encyclopedia of Hinduism: Sacred texts, ritual traditions, arts, concepts |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=QnVQSAAACAAJ |year=2009|publisher=Brill Academic|isbn=978-90-04-17893-9}}
• {{cite book|author=Monica Juneja|title=Architecture in Medieval India: Forms, Contexts, Histories|url= https://books.google.com/books?id=7N7VAAAAMAAJ|year=2001|publisher=Orient Blackswan|isbn=978-81-7824-228-6}}
• {{citation|author=Stella Kramrisch|title=The Hindu Temple Volume 1|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=NNcXrBlI9S0C|year= 1976|publisher=Motilal Banarsidass (Reprinted 1946 Princeton University Press)|isbn=978-81-208-0223-0}}
• {{cite book|author=Stella Kramrisch|title=The Hindu Temple Volume 2|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=8-aS52MgIkMC|year= 1979|publisher=Motilal Banarsidass (Reprinted 1946 Princeton University Press)|isbn=978-81-208-0224-7}}
• {{cite book|author1=Michael W. Meister|author2=Madhusudan Dhaky|title=Encyclopaedia of Indian temple architecture|url= https://books.google.com/books?id=DRY3AQAAIAAJ|year=1986|publisher=American Institute of Indian Studies|isbn=978-0-8122-7992-4}}
• {{citation|author=George Michell|title=The Hindu Temple: An Introduction to Its Meaning and Forms|url= https://books.google.com/books?id=ajgImLs62gwC|year=1988|publisher=University of Chicago Press|isbn=978-0-226-53230-1}}
• {{citation|author=George Michell|title=Hindu Art and Architecture|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=YVl2QgAACAAJ|year=2000|publisher=Thames & Hudson|isbn=978-0-500-20337-8}}
• Michell, George (1990), The Penguin Guide to the Monuments of India, Volume 1: Buddhist, Jain, Hindu, 1990, Penguin Books, {{ISBN|0140081445}}
• {{citation|author=George Michell|title=Architecture and Art of Southern India|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=W6bphUvvPf4C |year=1995|publisher=Cambridge University Press|isbn=978-0-521-44110-0}}
• {{cite book|author=T. A. Gopinatha Rao|title=Elements of Hindu iconography|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=MJD-KresBwIC |year=1993 |publisher=Motilal Banarsidass |isbn=978-81-208-0878-2}}
• Rajan, K.V. Soundara (1998). Rock-Cut Temple Styles. Somaiya Publications: Mumbai. {{ISBN|81-7039-218-7}}
• {{cite book |last1=Sedyawati |first1=Edi |first2=Hariani |last2=Santiko |first3=Hasan |last3=Djafar |first4=Ratnaesih |last4=Maulana |first5=Wiwin Djuwita Sudjana |last5=Ramelan |first6=Chaidir |last6=Ashari |title=Candi Indonesia: Seri Jawa |language=id, en |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=MsLiCQAAQBAJ |publisher=Direktorat Jenderal Kebudayaan |year=2013 |location=Jakarta |isbn=978-602-17669-3-4 |ref={{sfnRef|Sedyawati|2013}}}}
• {{cite book|author=Ajay J. Sinha|title=Imagining Architects: Creativity in the Religious Monuments of India|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=WvqLzaSUGi8C |year=2000|publisher=University of Delaware Press|isbn=978-0-87413-684-5}}
• {{cite book |last=Soekmono |author-link=Soekmono |first=R. |editor=Jan Fontein |editor-link=Jan Fontein |title=The Javanese Candi: Function and Meaning, Volume 17 from Studies in Asian Art and Archaeology, Vol 17 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=7cd2Ha7fT90C |publisher=E.J. BRILL |year=1995 |location=Leiden |isbn=978-90-04-10215-6}}
• {{cite book|author1=Stella Snead|author2=Wendy Doniger|author3=George Michell|title=Animals in Four Worlds: Sculptures from India|url=https://archive.org/details/animalsinfourwor1989snea |url-access=registration|year=1989|publisher=University of Chicago Press|isbn=978-0-226-76726-0 }}
• {{cite book|author=D Srinivasan|title=Many Heads, Arms, and Eyes: Origin, Meaning, and Form of Multiplicity in Indian Art|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=vZheP9dIX9wC|year=1997|publisher=BRILL Academic|isbn=978-90-04-10758-8}}
• {{cite book|title=South Indian Temples|author=Burton Stein|isbn=978-0-7069-0449-9|publisher =Vikas|url= https://books.google.com/books?id=Hq5BngAACAAJ| year=1978}}
• {{cite book|author=Burton Stein|title=The New Cambridge History of India: Vijayanagara|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=OpxeaYQbGDMC|year=1989|publisher=Cambridge University Press|isbn=978-0-521-26693-2}}
• {{cite book|author1=Burton Stein|author2=David Arnold|title=A History of India|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=QY4zdTDwMAQC|year=2010|publisher=John Wiley & Sons|isbn=978-1-4443-2351-1}}
• {{cite book|author=Kapila Vatsyayan|title=The Square and the Circle of the Indian Arts|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=vwLJc3pBzzUC&pg=PR10|year=1997|publisher=Abhinav Publications|isbn=978-81-7017-362-5}}

• [http://ccat.sas.upenn.edu/george/ Sabha, Vedic altar, Indian temples and Buddhist Mandala: Drawings], Patrick George, University of Pennsylvania
• [http://www.ece.lsu.edu/kak/Time2.pdf Space and Cosmology in the Hindu Temple]
• [https://web.archive.org/web/20040624010732/http://pages.slc.edu/~eraymond/ccorner/representation2.html Hindu Javanese Temples] (archived 24 June 2004)

{{Architecture of India}}

{{Hindudharma}}

{{DEFAULTSORT:Hindu Temple Architecture}}

Category:Sacral architecture