:History of chemical warfare

Ancient Greek myths about Heracles poisoning his arrows with the venom of the Hydra monster are the earliest references to toxic weapons in western literature. Homer's epics, the Iliad and the Odyssey, allude to poisoned arrows used by both sides in the legendary Trojan War (Bronze Age Greece).Adrienne Mayor, "Greek Fire, Poison Arrows & Scorpion Bombs: Biological and Chemical Warfare in the Ancient World" Overlook-Duckworth, 2003, rev ed with new Introduction 2008

Some of the earliest surviving references to toxic warfare appear in the Indian epics Ramayana and Mahabharata.{{Citation|title=The New Chemical Weapons Convention – Implementation and Prospects|editor1=Michael Bothe|editor2=Natalino Ronzitti|editor3=Allan Rosas|year=1998|publisher=Martinus Nijhoff Publishers|isbn=978-90-411-1099-2|page=17}} The "Laws of Manu," a Hindu treatise on statecraft (c. 400 BC) forbids the use of poison and fire arrows, but advises poisoning food and water. Kautilya's "Arthashastra", a statecraft manual of the same era, contains hundreds of recipes for creating poison weapons, toxic smokes, and other chemical weapons. Ancient Greek historians recount that Alexander the Great encountered poison arrows and fire incendiaries in India at the Indus basin in the 4th century BC.

File:The Art of War-Tangut script.jpg described the use of fire weapons against the enemy.]]

Arsenical smokes were known to the Chinese as far back as {{circa|1000}} BC{{Citation|last=Richardt|first=Andre|title=CBRN Protection: Managing the Threat of Chemical, Biological, Radioactive and Nuclear Weapons|year=2013|publisher=Wiley-VCH Verlag & Co.|location=Germany|isbn=978-3-527-32413-2|page=4}} and Sun Tzu's "Art of War" (c. 200 BC) advises the use of incendiary weapons. In the second century BC, writings of the Mohist sect in China describe the use of bellows to pump smoke from burning balls of toxic plants and vegetables into tunnels being dug by a besieging army. Other Chinese writings dating around the same period contain hundreds of recipes for the production of poisonous or irritating smokes for use in war along with numerous accounts of their use. These accounts describe an arsenic-containing "soul-hunting fog", and the use of finely divided lime dispersed into the air to suppress a peasant revolt in 178 AD.{{citation needed|date=April 2017}}

The earliest recorded use of gas warfare in the West dates back to the fifth century BC, during the Peloponnesian War between Athens and Sparta. Spartan forces besieging an Athenian city placed a lighted mixture of wood, pitch, and sulfur under the walls hoping that the noxious smoke would incapacitate the Athenians, so that they would not be able to resist the assault that followed. Sparta was not alone in its use of unconventional tactics in ancient Greece; Solon of Athens is said to have used hellebore roots to poison the water in an aqueduct leading from the River Pleistos around 590 BC during the siege of Kirrha.

The earliest archaeological evidence of gas warfare is during the Roman–Persian wars. Research carried out on the collapsed tunnels at Dura-Europos in Syria suggests that during the siege of the town in the third century AD, the Sasanians used bitumen and sulfur crystals to get it burning. When ignited, the materials gave off dense clouds of choking sulfur dioxide gases which killed 19 Roman soldiers and a single Sassanian, purported to be the fire-tender, in a matter of two minutes.Science Daily, dated January 19, 2009 [https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/01/090114075921.htm Sciencedaily.com]“Death Underground: Gas Warfare at Dura-Europos,” Current Archaeology, November 26, 2009 (online feature) http://www.archaeology.co.uk/cwa/world-news/death-underground-gas-warfare-at-dura-europos.htm (accessed October 3, 2014)Samir S. Patel, “Early Chemical Warfare – Dura-Europos, Syria,” Archaeology, Vol. 63, No. 1, January/February 2010, http://www.archaeology.org/1001/topten/syria.html (accessed October 3, 2014)Stephanie Pappas, “Buried Soldiers May Be Victims of Ancient Chemical Weapon,” LiveScience, March 8, 2011, http://www.livescience.com/13113-ancient-chemical-warfare-romans-persians.html (accessed October 3, 2014).

Quicklime may have been used in medieval naval warfare, including to use of "lime-mortars" to throw it at enemy ships.Sayers W. The Use of Quicklime in Medieval Naval Warfare // The Mariner's Mirror. – Volume 92 (2006). – Issue 3. – PP. 262–269. Scottish historian David Hume, in his work The History of England, recounted how during the reign of Henry III of England the English navy destroyed an invading French fleet by attacking it with quicklime.David Hume, History of England, Volume II.

In the late 15th century, Spanish conquistadors encountered a rudimentary type of chemical warfare on the island of Hispaniola. The Taíno threw gourds filled with ashes and ground hot peppers at the Spaniards to create a blinding smoke screen before launching their attack.{{citation|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=IqaMEWNvsJQC|title=1493: Uncovering the New World Columbus Created|page=9|author=Charles C. Mann|publisher=Random House Digital|year=2011|isbn=978-0-307-59672-7}}

The natives of the Pernambuco province used pepper smoke during sieges; they would wait till the wind was blowing towards the enemy, and light a bonfire filled with peppers.{{Cite journal |last1=Silva |first1=Gustavo Rocha |last2=Borges Jr. |first2=Itamar |last3=Figueroa-Villar |first3=José Daniel |last4=Castro |first4=Alexandre Taschetto de |date=2012 |title=Defesa química: histórico, classificação dos agentes de guerra e ação dos neurotóxicos |journal=Química Nova |language=pt |volume=35 |issue=10 |pages=2083–2091 |doi=10.1590/S0100-40422012001000033 |issn=0100-4042|doi-access=free }}

File:Adriaen Millaert - Portrait of Christoph Bernhardt von Galen, Bishop of Munster.jpg tried to use toxic fumes during the siege of the city of Groningen in 1672.]]

Leonardo da Vinci proposed the use of a powder of sulfide, arsenic and verdigris in the 15th century:

:throw poison in the form of powder upon galleys. Chalk, fine sulfide of arsenic, and powdered verdegris may be thrown among enemy ships by means of small mangonels, and all those who, as they breathe, inhale the powder into their lungs will become asphyxiated.

It is unknown whether this powder was ever actually used.

In the 17th century during sieges, armies attempted to start fires by launching incendiary shells filled with sulfur, tallow, rosin, turpentine, saltpeter, and/or antimony. Even when fires were not started, the resulting smoke and fumes provided a considerable distraction. Although their primary function was never abandoned, a variety of fills for shells were developed to maximize the effects of the smoke.

In 1672, during his siege of the city of Groningen, Christoph Bernhard von Galen, the Bishop of Münster, employed several different explosive and incendiary devices, some of which had a fill that included belladonna, intended to produce toxic fumes. Just three years later, August 27, 1675, the French and the Holy Roman Empire concluded the Strasbourg Agreement, which included an article banning the use of "perfidious and odious" toxic devices.{{Citation needed|date=November 2010}}

Pirate Captain Thompson used "vast numbers of powder flasks, grenade shells, and stinkpots" to defeat two pirate-hunters sent by the Governor of Jamaica in 1721.{{cite book |last1=Headlam |first1=Cecil |url=http://www.british-history.ac.uk/cal-state-papers/colonial/america-west-indies/vol31/pp1-21 |title=America and West Indies: January 1719 {{!}} British History Online |date=1933 |publisher=His Majesty's Stationery Office |edition=January 1719 |location=London |pages=1–21 |language=en |access-date=28 July 2017}}

The Qing dynasty used stinkpots in naval operations.Needham, Joseph (1986). Science and Civilization in China: Volume 5, Chemistry and Chemical Technology, Part 7, Military Technology: the gunpowder epic. Taipei: Caves Books Ltd. Pages 189. Those earthenware incendiary weapons were in part filled with sulphur, gunpowder, nails, and shot, while the other part was filled with noxious materials designed to emanate a highly unpleasant and suffocating smell to its enemies when ignited. During the War of 1812, the Royal Navy used stinkpots in a bombardment of Stonington, Connecticut on 9 August 1814.Johnson, Rossiter. Chapter XVI. Operations Along the Coast. A History of the War of 1812–1815 between the United States and Great Britain. Rossiter Johnson. {{ISBN|1347974431}}

File:Lyon Playfair.jpg proposed the industrial manufacture of cyanide artillery shells for use during the Crimean War.]]

The modern notion of chemical warfare emerged from the mid-19th century, with the development of modern chemistry and associated industries. The first recorded modern proposal for the use of chemical warfare was made by Lyon Playfair, Secretary of the Science and Art Department, in 1854 during the Crimean War. He proposed a cacodyl cyanide artillery shell for use against enemy ships as way to solve the stalemate during the siege of Sevastopol. The proposal was backed by Admiral Thomas Cochrane of the Royal Navy. It was considered by the Prime Minister, Lord Palmerston, but the British Ordnance Department rejected the proposal as "as bad a mode of warfare as poisoning the wells of the enemy." Playfair's response was used to justify chemical warfare into the next century:

{{cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=MQMGhInCvlgC|title=Chemical and Biological Warfare: A Comprehensive Survey for the Concerned Citizen|author=Eric Croddy|year=2002|publisher=Springer|page=131|isbn=9780387950761}}

:There was no sense in this objection. It is considered a legitimate mode of warfare to fill shells with molten metal which scatters among the enemy, and produced the most frightful modes of death. Why a poisonous vapor which would kill men without suffering is to be considered illegitimate warfare is incomprehensible. War is destruction, and the more destructive it can be made with the least suffering the sooner will be ended that barbarous method of protecting national rights. No doubt in time chemistry will be used to lessen the suffering of combatants, and even of criminals condemned to death.

Later, during the American Civil War, New York school teacher John Doughty proposed the offensive use of chlorine gas, delivered by filling a 10-inch (254 millimeter) artillery shell with two to three quarts (1.89{{endash}}2.84 liters) of liquid chlorine, which could produce many cubic feet of chlorine gas. Doughty's plan was apparently never acted on, as it was probably{{cite web|last1=Smart|first1=Jeffery K|title=CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL WARFARE RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT DURING THE CIVIL WAR|url=http://www.wood.army.mil/ccmuseum/ccmuseum/library/Civil_War_CBW.pdf|website=United States Army|publisher=US Army Soldier and Biological Chemical Command|access-date=November 7, 2014|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150714165422/http://www.wood.army.mil/ccmuseum/ccmuseum/library/Civil_War_CBW.pdf|archive-date=July 14, 2015|url-status=dead}} presented to Brigadier General James Wolfe Ripley, Chief of Ordnance.{{Clarify|reason=Why would presenting it to Ripley be cause for the idea to be shot down?|date=April 2020}}

In March 1868, during the War of Triple Alliance, the Paraguayan troops threw lit tubes full of asphixiating mixtures in their attempt to board Brazilian ironclads with canoes. The attack failed since the tubes were easily put out by the defenders.{{Cite journal |last=Barros |first=Aldeir Isael Faxina |date=2021-05-31 |title=Abordagem aos Encouraçados no Tagy (1868) |url=http://portaldeperiodicos.marinha.mil.br/index.php/navigator/article/view/1123 |journal=Navigator |language=pt |volume=17 |issue=33 |pages=98–114 |issn=2763-6267}}

A general concern over the use of poison gas manifested itself in 1899 at the Hague Conference with a proposal prohibiting shells filled with asphyxiating gas. The proposal was passed, despite a single dissenting vote from the United States. The American representative, Navy Captain Alfred Thayer Mahan, justified voting against the measure on the grounds that "the inventiveness of Americans should not be restricted in the development of new weapons."{{cite book|last1=Tuchman|first1=Barbara|title=The Proud Tower: A Portrait of the World Before the War, 1890–1914|date=1966|publisher=Penguin Books Limited |isbn=9780241968253|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=Lh3QAgAAQBAJ&q=%22the+inventive+genius%22&pg=PT364|access-date=June 23, 2020}}

{{Main|Chemical weapons in World War I}}

File:British 55th Division gas casualties 10 April 1918.jpg, April 10, 1918]]

File:Smelling Case of War Gases, Clifton Park Museum.jpg

The French were the first to use chemical weapons during the First World War, using the tear gases ethyl bromoacetate and chloroacetone. They likely did not realize that effects might be more serious under wartime conditions than in riot control. It is also likely that their use of tear gas escalated to the use of poisonous gases.{{cite book|last1=Verwey|first1=Wil D.|title=Riot control agents and herbicides in war : their humanitarian, toxicological, ecological, military, palemological, and legal aspects|date=1977|publisher=Sigthoff|location=Lieden|isbn=9789028603363|pages=33–34, 196|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=QgmHOdIjITsC&pg=PA33|access-date=April 13, 2017}}

File:mustard gas burns.jpg burns, ca. 1917–1918]]

The Hague Declaration of 1899 and the Hague Convention of 1907 prohibit the firing of any projectiles "the sole object of which is the diffusion of asphyxiating or deleterious gases."{{Cite web |title=About this Service | Federal Research Division | Services | Library of Congress |url=https://www.loc.gov/services/federal-research-division/about-this-service/ |website=Library of Congress, Washington, D.C. 20540 USA}} Germany exploited this loophole by opening canisters filled with poison gas into the wind and letting it carry it towards the enemy lines, instead of launching it in artillery rounds. One of Germany's earliest uses of chemical weapons occurred on October 27, 1914, when shells containing the irritant dianisidine chlorosulfonate were fired at British troops near Neuve-Chapelle, France. Germany used another irritant, xylyl bromide, in artillery shells that were fired in January 1915 at the Russians near Bolimów, in present-day Poland.[http://www.channel4.com/history/microsites/F/firstworldwar/cont_harbinger_3.html "The First World War"] (a Channel 4 documentary based on the book by Hew Strachan) The first full-scale deployment of deadly chemical warfare agents during World War I was at the Second Battle of Ypres, on April 22, 1915, when the Germans attacked French, Canadian and Algerian troops with chlorine gas released from canisters and carried by the wind towards the Allied trenches.{{Cite web|url=https://www.britannica.com/technology/chemical-weapon|title = Chemical weapon | History, Facts, Types, & Effects| date=11 May 2024 }}{{cite book|last1=Faith|first1=Thomas|title=Behind the gas mask : the U.S. chemical warfare service in war and peace.|date=2014|publisher=University of Illinois Press|location=Champaign, IL|isbn=978-0252080265|page=9|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=vG1zAwAAQBAJ&pg=PA57|access-date=April 14, 2017}}{{cite web|title=April 22, 1915: Germans introduce poison gas|url=http://www.history.com/this-day-in-history/germans-introduce-poison-gas|website=This Day In History|access-date=April 14, 2017}}{{cite journal|last1=Gross|first1=Daniel A.|title=Chemical Warfare: From the European Battlefield to the American Laboratory|journal=Distillations|date=Spring 2015|volume=1|issue=1|pages=16–23|url=https://www.sciencehistory.org/distillations/magazine/chemical-warfare-from-the-european-battlefield-to-the-american-laboratory|access-date=March 20, 2018}}

A total 50,965 tons of pulmonary, lachrymatory, and vesicant agents were deployed by both sides of the conflict, including chlorine, phosgene, and mustard gas. Historians have reached a wide range of estimates on gas casualties, ranging from 500k to 1.3 million casualties directly caused by chemical warfare agents during the course of the war. A minimum of around 1300 civilians were injured due to the use of the weapons, and at least around 4000 were injured during weapon production.{{cite book|title=The Poisonous Cloud: Chemical warfare in the First World War|pages = 239-253|last1 = Haber|first1 = L. F.|year = 2002|isbn=9780191512315 }}

File:World War I, British soccer team with gas masks, 1916.jpgs, Western Front, 1916]]

World War I-era chemical ammunition is still found, unexploded, at former battle, storage, or test sites and poses an ongoing threat to inhabitants of Belgium, France and other countries.{{cite book|last1=Colditz|first1=Graham A.|title=Encyclopedia of cancer and society|date=2007|publisher=Sage Publications|location=Los Angeles|isbn=978-1412949897|pages=1013–1015|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=nbQ5DQAAQBAJ&pg=PA1013|access-date=April 14, 2017}} Camp American University where American chemical weapons were developed and later buried, has undergone 20 years of remediation efforts.{{cite book|last1=Albright|first1=Richard D.|title=Cleanup of chemical and explosive munitions : locating, identifying contaminants, and planning for environmental remediation of land and sea military ranges and ordnance dumpsites|date=2012|publisher=Elsevier/William Andrew|location=Amsterdam|isbn=978-1-4377-3477-5|pages=137–240|edition=2nd|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=2tu0ech7-KUC&pg=PR16|access-date=April 13, 2017}}{{cite news|last1=Ashooh|first1=Emma|title=A Hidden History: American University's Role in World War I|url=http://www.amwordmag.com/article/2015/12/a-hidden-history|access-date=April 13, 2017|work=American Word|date=December 7, 2015}}

After the war, the most common method of disposal of chemical weapons was to dump them into the nearest large body of water.{{cite journal|last1=Curry|first1=Andrew|title=Weapons of War Litter the Ocean Floor|journal=Hakai Magazine|date=November 10, 2016|url=https://www.hakaimagazine.com/article-long/weapons-war-litter-ocean-floor|access-date=April 14, 2017}} As many as 65,000 tons of chemical warfare agents may have been dumped in the Baltic Sea alone; agents dumped in that sea included mustard gas, phosgene, lewisite (β-chlorovinyldichloroarsine), adamsite (diphenylaminechloroarsine), Clark I (diphenylchloroarsine) and Clark II (diphenylcyanoarsine).{{cite book|last1=Tyner|first1=James A.|title=Military legacies : a world made by war|date=2010|publisher=Routledge|location=New York (N.Y.)|isbn=978-0415995948|pages=113–115|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=L7SLAgAAQBAJ&pg=PT113|access-date=April 14, 2017}}{{cite book|author-last=Andrulewicz|author-first=E.|chapter=Chemical weapons dumped in the Baltic Sea|title=Assessment of the Fate and Effects of Toxic Agents on Water Resources|pages=299–319|editor-last1=Gonenc|editor-first1=I.E.|editor-last2=Koutitonsky|editor-first2=V.G.|editor-last3=Rashleigh|editor-first3=B.|editor-last4=Ambrose|editor-first4=R.B.|editor-last5=Wolflin|editor-first5=J.P.|date=2007|publisher=Springer|location=Dordrecht|edition=NATO Security through Science Series|doi=10.1007/978-1-4020-5528-7_15|series=NATO Security through Science Series|isbn=978-1-4020-5526-3}}{{cite book|last1=HELCOM|title=Report on Chemical Munitions Dumped in the Baltic Sea Report to the 16th Meeting of Helsinki Commission 8 - 11 March 1994 from the Ad Hoc Working Group on Dumped Chemical Munition (HELCOM CHEMU) January 1994|date=1994|publisher=Danish Environmental Protection Agency|url=http://www.helcom.fi/Lists/Publications/Report%20on%20chemical%20munitions%20dumped%20in%20the%20Baltic%20Sea.pdf}} Over time the containers corrode, and the chemicals leaked out. On the sea floor, at low temperatures, mustard gas tends to form lumps within a "skin" of chemical byproducts. These lumps can wash onto shore, where they look like chunks of waxy yellowish clay. They are extremely toxic, but the effects may not be immediately apparent.

During the interwar period, chemical agents were occasionally used to subdue populations and suppress rebellion. In 1925, 16 of the world's major nations signed the Geneva Protocol, thereby pledging never to use chemical weapons in interstate warfare again. Notably, while the United States delegation under presidential authority signed the Protocol, it was not ratified until 1975. The Protocol does not ban the development or production of chemical weapons nor it applies to non-international armed conflicts.

{{see also|Alleged British use of chemical weapons in Mesopotamia in 1920}}

It has been alleged that the British used chemical weapons in Mesopotamia during the Iraqi revolt of 1920. Noam Chomsky claimed that Winston Churchill at the time was keen on chemical weapons, suggesting they be used "against recalcitrant Arabs as an experiment", and that he stated to be "strongly in favour of using poisoned gas against uncivilised tribes".{{cite web|last=Glancey |first=Jonathan |date=19 April 2003 |title=Our last occupation |url=https://www.theguardian.com/world/2003/apr/19/iraq.arts |work=The Guardian}}{{cite book |last=Chomsky |first=Noam |author-link=Noam Chomsky |year=1996 |title=World Orders Old and New |location=New York |publisher=Columbia University Press}}

According to some historians, including Geoff Simons and Charles Townshend, the British used chemical weapons in the conflict,{{cite book|last=Townshend|first=Charles|year=1986|chapter=Civilisation and “Frightfulness”: Air Control in the Middle East Between the Wars|editor=Chris Wrigley|title=Warfare, diplomacy and politics: essays in honour of A.J.P. Taylor|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=rkhnAAAAMAAJ|publisher=Hamilton|isbn=978-0-241-11789-7|page=148}}Geoff Simons, Iraq: From Sumer to Saddam, London/New York: St. Martins, 1994, {{ISBN|9780312102098}}, pp. 179–81. while according to Lawrence James and Niall Ferguson the weapons were agreed by Churchill but eventually not used;Lawrence James, The Rise and Fall of the British Empire, London: Little, Brown, 1994; New York: St Martin's, 1996, {{ISBN|9780312140397}}, p. 392.Niall Ferguson, The War of the World: History's Age of Hatred, London/New York: Allen Lane, 2006, {{ISBN|9780713997088}}, p. 412. R.M. Douglas of Colgate University also observed that Churchill's statement had served to convince observers of the existence of weapons of mass destruction which were not actually there.{{cite journal |last=Douglas |first=R. M. |date=December 2009 |title=Did Britain Use Chemical Weapons in Mandatory Iraq? |journal=Journal of Modern History |volume=81 |issue=4 |page=859 |doi=10.1086/605488|s2cid=154708409 }}

{{section-stub|date=June 2022}}

Lenin's Soviet government employed poison gas in 1921 during the Tambov Rebellion. An order signed by military commanders Tukhachevsky and Vladimir Antonov-Ovseyenko stipulated, "The forests where the bandits are hiding are to be cleared by the use of poison gas. This must be carefully calculated, so that the layer of gas penetrates the forests and kills everyone hiding there."{{cite book|author=Edvard Radzinsky|title=Stalin|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=3DtwdU7921YC&pg=PA173|year=2011|publisher=Knopf Doubleday |page=173|isbn=9780307754684}}Nicolas Werth, Karel Bartošek, Jean-Louis Panné, Jean-Louis Margolin, Andrzej Paczkowski, Stéphane Courtois, The Black Book of Communism: Crimes, Terror, Repression, Harvard University Press, 1999, hardcover, 858 pages, {{ISBN|0-674-07608-7}}

In the 1930s, the Soviet Union used mustard gas deployed from planes against Basmachi rebels in Central Asia.{{Cite book|last1=Christianson|first1=Scott |title=Fatal Airs: The Deadly History and Apocalyptic Future of Lethal Gases that Threaten Our World |year=2010 |publisher=ABC-CLIO |isbn=9780313385520 |page=38}}

During the Soviet invasion of Xinjiang in 1934, Ma Zhongying's New 36th Division put up a fierce resistance at the Battle of Dawan Cheng, but was forced to retreat after Soviets delivered mustard gas from planes.{{Cite book|last=Cote|first=James D.|authorlink=|editor-last=Dowling|editor-first=Timothy C.|chapter=Dawan Cheng, Battle of (1934)|title=Russia at War: From the Mongol Conquest to Afghanistan, Chechnya, and Beyond|publisher=ABC-CLIO|year=2014|isbn=9781598849486|pages=237–238}}

A chemical arms race developed during the Warlord Era. The first chemical weapons were imported by a minor Hunan warlord, who bought two small cases of "gas-producing shells" in August 1921. Marshal Cao Kun, approached a British-owned chemical company in Tianjin in 1923; he attempted to order gas bombs, but as far as is known they turned down his proposal. In 1925, Zhang Zuolin had a chemical plant built in Mukden and hired German and Russian experts to produce chlorine, phosgene and mustard gas, in the same year Feng Yuxiang also set up a ‘special arsenal’ to produce chemical weapons designed by Soviet and German experts. All of these efforts appear to have failed. There was one reported incident of chemical warfare when Zhang Zuolin's aircraft dropped gas bombs’ on the forces of Wu Peifu; who branded the use of these bombs as inhumane.{{Cite book |last=Jowett |first=Philip S. |url=https://www.worldcat.org/oclc/495781134 |title=Chinese warlord armies, 1911–30 |date=2010 |publisher=Osprey |others=Stephen Walsh |isbn=978-1-84908-402-4 |location=Oxford |oclc=495781134}}

{{see also|Chemical weapons in the Rif War}}

Combined Spanish and French forces dropped mustard gas bombs against Berber rebels and civilians during the Rif War in Spanish Morocco (1921–1927). These attacks marked the first widespread employment of gas warfare in the post-WWI era.{{cite web |url=http://www.20minutos.es/noticia/152104/0/supervivientes/bombardeos/rif/ |title=Los últimos de Alhucemas |access-date=2007-04-13 |last=Rada |first=Javier |date= September 2006 |publisher=20minutos.es |language=es |quote=Durante la guerra del Rif (1921–1927), la última pesadilla colonial, España fue una de las primeras potencias en utilizar armas químicas contra población civil. }} The Spanish army indiscriminately used phosgene, diphosgene, chloropicrin and mustard gas against civilian populations, markets and rivers.{{cite news |url=http://www.elpais.com/articulo/cataluna/ERC/exige/Espana/pida/perdon/uso/armas/quimicas/guerra/Rif/elpepuespcat/20050703elpcat_12/Tes |title=ERC exige que España pida perdón por el uso de armas químicas en la guerra del Rif |access-date=2007-04-13 |last=Noguer |first=Miquel |date= July 2005 |newspaper=El País |language=es |quote=Tras tan estrepitosa derrota, el ejército español no tuvo reparos en utilizar productos como fosgeno, difosgeno, cloropicrina o el mismo gas mostaza contra la población civil. }}Enrique Cerro Aguilar. "España fue el primer país que utilizó armas químicas contra civiles en Marruecos en 1920". Revista Rebelión. 13 de enero de 2001. – {{in lang|es}} Although Spain signed the Geneva Protocol in 1925, it only prohibited the use of chemical and biological weapons in international conflicts, instead of non-international conflicts like the Rif War.

In a telegram sent by the High Commissioner of Spanish Morocco Dámaso Berenguer on August 12, 1921, to the Spanish minister of War, Berenguer stated: "I have been obstinately resistant to the use of suffocating gases against these indigenous peoples but after what they have done, and of their treacherous and deceptive conduct, I have to use them with true joy."{{cite web |url=http://www.elmundo.es/2001/04/18/sociedad/983737.html |title=Gas mostaza sobre el Rif |access-date=2007-04-13 |last=Espinosa |first=Javier |date= April 2001 |publisher=El Mundo |language=es |quote=Juan Pando en su reciente libro Historia secreta de Annual han documentado su uso }}

According to military aviation general Hidalgo de Cisneros in his autobiographical book Cambio de rumbo,Hidalgo, de Cisneros. Cambio de Rumbo – p. 193-7 he was the first warfighter to drop a 100-kilogram mustard gas bomb from his Farman F60 Goliath aircraft in the summer of 1924.{{cite book |last=Balfour |first=Sebastian |title=Deadly Embrace: Morocco and the road to the Spanish Civil War |year=2002 |publisher=Oxford University Press |isbn=0-19-925296-3 |pages=142 }} About 127 fighters and bombers flew in the campaign, dropping around 1,680 bombs each day.Informe sobre la actuación de la Aviación en el Protectorado. 4 Mar. 1924. AGA Africa, caja M12, exp. 2. The mustard gas bombs were brought from the stockpiles of Germany and delivered to Melilla before being carried on Farman F60 Goliath airplanes.Hidalgo, de Cisneros. Cambio de Rumbo – p. 193-4 Historian Juan Pando has been the only Spanish historian to have confirmed the usage of mustard gas starting in 1923. Spanish newspaper La Correspondencia de España published an article called Cartas de un soldado (Letters of a soldier) on August 16, 1923, which backed the usage of mustard gas.{{cite book |last=Balfour |first=Sebastian |title=Deadly Embrace: Morocco and the road to the Spanish Civil War |year=2002 |publisher=Oxford University Press |isbn=0-19-925296-3 |pages=130 }}

Some have cited the chemical weapons used in the region as the main reason for the widespread occurrence of cancer among the population.{{Cite web|last=Yabiladi.com|title=حرب الريف: عريضة تدعو إسبانيا وفرنسا وألمانيا والولايات المتحدة لتحمل مسؤولياتهم|url=https://www.yabiladi.ma/articles/details/63500/حرب-الريف-عريضة-تدعو-إسبانيا.html|access-date=2021-05-06|website=www.yabiladi.ma|language=ar}} In 2007, the Catalan party of the Republican Left (Esquerra Republicana de Catalunya) passed a bill to the Spanish Congress of Deputies requesting Spain to acknowledge the "systematic" use of chemical weapons against the population of the Rif mountains;{{cite web|url=http://www.esquerra.cat/web_nova/php_admin/inici.php?seccio=Noticies&num_article=5161 |title=Esquerra lamenta que ni PSC ni CiU no donin suport a reconèixer la barbàrie espanyola contra la població del Rif |access-date=2007-04-11 |author=Rosa Maria Bonàs |publisher=Esquerra Republicana de Catalunya |language=ca |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110716202834/http://www.esquerra.cat/web_nova/php_admin/inici.php?seccio=Noticies&num_article=5161 |archive-date=2011-07-16 }} however, the bill was rejected by 33 votes from the governing Socialist Labor Party and the opposition right-wing Popular Party.{{cite web|url=http://www.map.ma/eng/sections/regional/spanish_parliament_r/view |title=Spanish parliament refuses to discuss Spain's use of chemical weapons during Rif war in Morocco |access-date=2007-04-11 |work=Maghreb Arab Press |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070927220656/http://www.map.ma/eng/sections/regional/spanish_parliament_r/view |archive-date=2007-09-27 |url-status=dead }}

Italy used mustard gas and other "gruesome measures" against Senussi forces in Libya (see Pacification of Libya, Italian colonization of Libya).Saskia van Genugten, Libya in Western Foreign Policies, 1911–2011 (Palgrave Macmillan, 2016), p. 31. Poison gas was used against the Libyans as early as January 1928 Ronald Bruce St. John, Libya: Continuity and Change (Routledge, 2015), p. 16. The Italians dropped mustard gas from the air.Andrew Jackson Waskey & Spencer C. Tucker, "Senussi and Sultan of Darfur Rebellions" in Encyclopedia of Insurgency and Counterinsurgency: A New Era of Modern Warfare (ed. Spencer C. Tucker: ABC-CLIO, 2013), p. 498.

Beginning in October 1935 and continuing into the following months, Fascist Italy used mustard gas against the Ethiopians during the Second Italo-Abyssinian War in violation of the Geneva Protocol. Italian general Rodolfo Graziani first ordered the use of chemical weapons at Gorrahei against the forces of Ras Nasibu."Chemical Weapons" in Historical Dictionary of Ethiopia, 2d ed. (eds. David H. Shinn & Thomas P. Ofcansky: Scarecrow Press, 2013). Benito Mussolini personally authorized Graziani to use chemical weapons.Rainer Baudendistel, Between Bombs and Good Intentions: The International Committee of the Red Cross and the Italo-Ethiopian War, 1935–1936, pp. 264–67. Chemical weapons dropped by warplane "proved to be very effective" and was used "on a massive scale against civilians and troops, as well as to contaminate fields and water supplies."William R. Cullen, Is Arsenic an Aphrodisiac?: Th Sociochemistry of an Element (Royal Society of Chemistry, 2008), p. 241. Among the most intense chemical bombardment by the Italian Air Force in Ethiopia occurred in February and March 1936, although "gas warfare continued, with varying intensity, until March 1939." J. F. C. Fuller, who was present in Ethiopia during the conflict, stated that mustard gas "was the decisive tactical factor in the war."Jeffrey Legro, Cooperation Under Fire: Anglo-German Restraint During World War II (Cornell University Press, 2005). Some estimate that up to one-third of Ethiopian casualties of the war were caused by chemical weapons.Walter Laqueur, The New Terrorism: Fanaticism and the Arms of Mass Destruction (Oxford University Press, 1999), p. 57.

The Italians' deployment of mustard gas prompted international criticism. In April 1936, British Prime Minister Stanley Baldwin told Parliament: "If a great European nation, in spite of having given its signature to the Geneva Protocol against the use of such gases, employs them in Africa, what guarantee have we that they may not be used in Europe?"Edward M. Spiers, Chemical and Biological Weapons: A Study of Proliferation (Macmillan: 1994). Mussolini initially denied the use of chemical weapons; later, Mussolini and Italian government sought to justify their use as lawful retaliation for Ethiopian atrocities.

After the liberation of Ethiopia in 1941, Ethiopia repeatedly but unsuccessfully sought to prosecute Italian war criminals. The Allied powers excluded Ethiopia from the United Nations War Crimes Commission (established in 1942) because the Allies feared that Ethiopia would seek to prosecute Italian commander Pietro Badoglio, who had ordered the use of chemical gas in the Second Italo-Ethiopian War but later "became a valuable ally against the Axis powers" after the fall of the Fascist regime in Italy, serving as a senior officer in the Italian Co-belligerent Army. In 1946, Ethiopians ruler Haile Selassie again sought "to prosecute senior Italian officials who had sanctioned the use of chemical weapons and had committed other war crimes such as torturing and executing Ethiopian prisoners and citizens during the Italian-Ethiopian War." These attempts failed, in large part because the Western Allies wished to avoid alienating the Italian government at a time when Italy was seen as key to containing the Soviet Union.

Following World War II, the Italian government denied that Italy had ever used chemical weapons in Africa; only in 1995 did Italy formally acknowledge that it had used chemical weapons in colonial wars."Introduction" in Italian Colonialism (eds. Ruth Ben-Ghiat & Mia Fuller: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005), p. 6.

File:Sarin-2D-skeletal.png nerve gas, developed in Germany in 1939]]

Shortly after the end of World War I, Germany's General Staff enthusiastically pursued a recapture of their preeminent position in chemical warfare. In 1923, Hans von Seeckt pointed the way, by suggesting that German poison gas research move in the direction of delivery by aircraft in support of mobile warfare. Also in 1923, at the behest of the German army, poison gas expert Dr. Hugo Stoltzenberg negotiated with the USSR to build a huge chemical weapons plant at Trotsk, on the Volga river.

Collaboration between Germany and the Soviet Union in poison gas research continued on and off through the 1920s. In 1924, German officers debated the use of poison gas versus non-lethal chemical weapons against civilians.

Chemical warfare was revolutionized by Nazi Germany's discovery of the nerve agents tabun (in 1937) and sarin (in 1939) by Gerhard Schrader, a chemist of IG Farben.

IG Farben was Germany's premier poison gas manufacturer during World War II, so the weaponization of these agents cannot be considered accidental.Corum, James S., The Roots of Blitzkrieg, University Press of Kansas, USA, 1992, pp.106–107. Both were turned over to the German Army Weapons Office prior to the outbreak of the war.

The nerve agent soman was later discovered by Nobel Prize laureate Richard Kuhn and his collaborator Konrad Henkel at the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute for Medical Research in Heidelberg in the spring of 1944.{{citation|first=Florian|last=Schmaltz|title=Kampfstoff-Forschung im Nationalsozialismus Zur Kooperation von Kaiser-Wilhelm-Instituten, Militär und Industrie|publisher=Wallstein Verlag|year=2005}}{{citation|first=Florian |last=Schmaltz|title=Neurosciences and Research on Chemical Weapons of Mass Destruction in Nazi Germany|journal=Journal of the History of the Neurosciences|year=2006|pages=186–209|doi=10.1080/09647040600658229|volume=15|pmid=16887760|issue=3|s2cid=46250604}} The Germans developed and manufactured large quantities of several agents, but chemical warfare was not extensively used by either side. Chemical troops were set up (in Germany since 1934) and delivery technology was actively developed.

File:Japanese Special Naval Landing Forces in Battle of Shanghai 1937.jpg in the Battle of Shanghai ]]

Despite the 1899 Hague Declaration IV, 2 – Declaration on the Use of Projectiles the Object of Which is the Diffusion of Asphyxiating or Deleterious Gases,{{cite web|url=http://avalon.law.yale.edu/19th_century/dec99-02.asp |title=Laws of War: Declaration on the Use of Projectiles the Object of Which is the Diffusion of Asphyxiating or Deleterious Gases; July 29, 1899 |publisher=Avalon.law.yale.edu |access-date=January 18, 2014}} Article 23 (a) of the 1907 Hague Convention IV – The Laws and Customs of War on Land,{{cite web |url=http://www.icrc.org/ihl/385ec082b509e76c41256739003e636d/1d1726425f6955aec125641e0038bfd6?OpenDocument |title=Convention (IV) respecting the Laws and Customs of War on Land and its annex: Regulations concerning the Laws and Customs of War on Land. The Hague, 18 October 1907. |publisher=International Committee of the Red Cross |access-date=January 18, 2014}} and a resolution adopted against Japan by the League of Nations on May 14, 1938, the Imperial Japanese Army frequently used chemical weapons. Because of fear of retaliation, however, those weapons were never used against Westerners, but against other Asians judged "inferior" by imperial propaganda. According to historians Yoshiaki Yoshimi and Kentaro Awaya, gas weapons, such as tear gas, were used only sporadically in 1937 but in early 1938, the Imperial Japanese Army began full-scale use of sneeze and nausea gas (red), and from mid-1939, used mustard gas (yellow) against both Kuomintang and Communist Chinese troops.Yuki Tanaka, Poison Gas, the Story Japan Would Like to Forget, Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, October 1988, p. 16-17

According to historians Yoshiaki Yoshimi and Seiya Matsuno, the chemical weapons were authorized by specific orders given by Emperor Hirohito himself, transmitted by the chief of staff of the army. For example, the Emperor authorized the use of toxic gas on 375 separate occasions during the Battle of Wuhan from August to October 1938.Y. Yoshimi and S. Matsuno, Dokugasusen Kankei Shiryô II, Kaisetsu, Jugonen Sensô Gokuhi Shiryoshu, 1997, p.27-29 They were also profusely used during the invasion of Changde. Those orders were transmitted either by Prince Kan'in Kotohito or General Hajime Sugiyama.Yoshimi and Matsuno, idem, Herbert Bix, Hirohito and the Making of Modern Japan, 2001, p.360-364 The Imperial Japanese Army had used mustard gas and the US-developed (CWS-1918) blister agent lewisite against Chinese troops and guerrillas. Experiments involving chemical weapons were conducted on live prisoners (Unit 731 and Unit 516).

The Japanese also carried chemical weapons as they swept through Southeast Asia towards Australia. Some of these items were captured and analyzed by the Allies. Historian Geoff Plunkett has recorded how Australia covertly imported 1,000,000 chemical weapons from the United Kingdom from 1942 onwards and stored them in many storage depots around the country, including three tunnels in the Blue Mountains to the west of Sydney. They were to be used as a retaliatory measure if the Japanese first used chemical weapons.{{citation|url=http://www.bookdepository.co.uk/Chemical-Warfare-Australia-Geoff-Plunkett/9780987427908|title=Chemical Warfare in Australia (2nd Edn) 2013 (Army Military History Series)|author=Army History Unit}} Buried chemical weapons have been recovered at Marrangaroo and Columboola.{{citation|url=http://www.mustardgas.org|title=Chemical Warfare in Australia|author=Geoff Plunkett}}{{citation|url=http://www.bigskypublishing.com.au/Books/Military/Death-by-Mustard-Gas/1067/productview.aspx|title=Death By Mustard Gas|author=Geoff Plunkett|access-date=November 10, 2014|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20141110104625/http://www.bigskypublishing.com.au/Books/Military/Death-by-Mustard-Gas/1067/productview.aspx|archive-date=November 10, 2014|url-status=dead|df=mdy-all}}

File:Bundesarchiv B 145 Bild-F016216-0020A, Flugzeug über der Halbinsel Kertsch.jpg, May 1942.]]

During the Holocaust, a genocide perpetrated by Nazi Germany, millions of Jews, Romani, Slavs, homosexuals, people with disabilities, and other victims were gassed with carbon monoxide and hydrogen cyanide (including Zyklon B).Patrick Coffey, American Arsenal: A Century of Weapon Technology and Strategy (Oxford University Press, 2014), p. 152-54.James J. Wirtz, "Weapons of Mass Destruction" in Contemporary Security Studies (4th ed.), ed. Alan Collins, Contemporary Security Studies (Oxford University Press, 2016), p. 302. This remains the deadliest use of poison gas in history. Nevertheless, the Nazis did not extensively use chemical weapons in combat, at least not against the Western Allies,Callum Borchers, [https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2017/04/11/sean-spicer-someone-as-despicable-as-hitler-didnt-even-sink-to-using-chemical-weapons/ Sean Spicer takes his questionable claims to a new level in Hitler-Assad comparison], The Washington Post (April 11, 2017). despite maintaining an active chemical weapons program in which the Nazis used concentration camp prisoners as forced labor to secretly manufacture tabun, a nerve gas, and experimented upon concentration camp victims to test the effects of the gas. Otto Ambros of IG Farben was a chief chemical-weapons expert for the Nazis.Germany and the Second World War, Vol. 5, Issue 2 (Clarendon Press, 2003), p. 764.

The Nazis' decision to avoid the use of chemical weapons on the battlefield has been variously attributed to a lack of technical ability in the German chemical weapons program and fears that the Allies would retaliate with their own chemical weapons. It also has been speculated to have arisen from Adolf Hitler's experiences as a soldier in the German army during World War I, where he was injured by a British mustard gas attack in 1918.{{Cite web|url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/1562534.stm|title=Century of biological and chemical weapons |date=September 25, 2001|website=BBC News}} After the Battle of Stalingrad, Joseph Goebbels, Robert Ley, and Martin Bormann urged Hitler to approve the use of tabun and other chemical weapons to slow the Soviet advance. At a May 1943 meeting in the Wolf's Lair, however, Hitler was told by Ambros that Germany had 45,000 tons of chemical gas stockpiled, but that the Allies likely had far more. Hitler responded by suddenly leaving the room and ordering production of tabun and sarin to be doubled, but "fearing some rogue officer would use them and spark Allied retaliation, he ordered that no chemical weapons be transported to the Russian front." After the Allied invasion of Italy, the Germans rapidly moved to remove or destroy both German and Italian chemical-weapon stockpiles, "for the same reason that Hitler had ordered them pulled from the Russian front—they feared that local commanders would use them and trigger Allied chemical retaliation."

Stanley P. Lovell, deputy director for Research and Development of the Office of Strategic Services, reports in his book Of Spies and Stratagems that the Allies knew the Germans had quantities of Gas Blau available for use in the defense of the Atlantic Wall. The use of nerve gas on the Normandy beachhead would have seriously impeded the Allies and possibly caused the invasion to fail altogether. He submitted the question "Why was nerve gas not used in Normandy?" to be asked of Hermann Göring during his interrogation after the war had ended. Göring answered that the reason was that the Wehrmacht was dependent upon horse-drawn transport to move supplies to their combat units, and had never been able to devise a gas mask horses could tolerate; the versions they developed would not pass enough pure air to allow the horses to pull a cart. Thus, gas was of no use to the German Army under most conditions.Stanley P. Lovell, Of Spies & Strategems (Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, 1963), p. 78.

The Nazis did use chemical weapons in combat on several occasions along the Black Sea, notably in Sevastopol, where they used toxic smoke to force Soviet resistance fighters out of caverns below the city, in violation of the 1925 Geneva Protocol.Chris Bellamy, Absolute War: Soviet Russia in the Second World War (Knopf, 2008). The Nazis also used asphyxiating gas in the catacombs of Odessa in November 1941, following their capture of the city, and in late May 1942 during the Battle of the Kerch Peninsula in eastern Crimea. Victor Israelyan, a Soviet ambassador, reported that the latter incident was perpetrated by the Wehrmacht's Chemical Forces and organized by a special detail of SS troops with the help of a field engineer battalion. Chemical Forces General Ochsner reported to German command in June 1942 that a chemical unit had taken part in the battle.{{cite book|last1=Israelyan|first1=Victor|title=On the Battlefields of the Cold War: A Soviet Ambassador's Confession|pages=339|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=sSDP-XiRMwUC&pg=PA339|isbn=978-0271047737|date=2010-11-01|publisher=Penn State Press }} After the battle in mid-May 1942, roughly 3,000 Red Army soldiers and Soviet civilians not evacuated by sea were besieged in a series of caves and tunnels in the nearby Adzhimushkay quarry. After holding out for approximately three months, "poison gas was released into the tunnels, killing all but a few score of the Soviet defenders."Merridale, Catherine, Ivan's War, Faber & Faber: pp. 148–150. Thousands of those killed around Adzhimushkay were documented to have been killed by asphyxiation from gas.

In February 1943, German troops stationed in Kuban received a telegram: "Russians might have to be cleared out of the mountain range with gas."Гречко, p. 468. The troops also received two wagons of toxin antidotes.

File:A BCV (Bulk Contamination Vehicle.jpg. Pictured is a chemical warfare bulk decontamination vehicle.]]

The Western Allies did not use chemical weapons during the Second World War. The British planned to use mustard gas and phosgene to help repel a German invasion in 1940–1941,{{cite news | url = https://www.independent.co.uk/news/sixty-secret-mustard-gas-sites-uncovered-1335343.html| title =Sixty secret mustard gas sites uncovered | work =The Independent | first =Christopher | last=Bellamy | date = June 4, 1996}}{{cite web | url=http://pillboxes-suffolk.webeden.co.uk/#/chemical-warfare/4543908803 | title=Chemical Warfare -Suffolk | work=Anti-Invasion defences Suffolk World War II | access-date=June 18, 2008 | archive-date=August 24, 2011 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110824121014/http://pillboxes-suffolk.webeden.co.uk/#/chemical-warfare/4543908803 | url-status=dead }} and had there been an invasion may have also deployed it against German cities.{{cite web | url =http://www.bpears.org.uk/Misc/War_NE/w_section_05.html | work =Rowlands Gill and the North-East 1939 – 1945 | title =Chapter 5 Invasion | first =Brian | last =Pears | url-status =dead | archive-url =https://web.archive.org/web/20060806075839/http://www.bpears.org.uk/Misc/War_NE/w_section_05.html | archive-date =August 6, 2006 | df =mdy-all }} General Alan Brooke, Commander-in-Chief, Home Forces, in command of British anti-invasion preparations of the Second World War said that he "...had every intention of using sprayed mustard gas on the beaches" in an annotation in his diary.Alanbrooke, 2001. Entry July 22, 1940. The British manufactured mustard, chlorine, lewisite, phosgene and Paris Green and stored them at airfields and depots for use on the beaches.

The mustard gas stockpile was enlarged in 1942–1943 for possible use by RAF Bomber Command against German cities, and in 1944 for possible retaliatory use if German forces used chemical weapons against the D-Day landings.

Winston Churchill, the British Prime Minister, issued a memorandum advocating a chemical strike on German cities using poison gas and possibly anthrax. Although the idea was rejected, it has provoked debate.BBC2 Newsnight, 1/5/81; The Guardian, 7,9,13,20,30/5, 2/6/81; [https://web.archive.org/web/20081006085903/http://archive.timesonline.co.uk/ The Times, 11/5/81, 20/5/81, 15/6/81]; The Listener, 25/6, 2/7, 17/8/81; Daily Telegraph, 18,21,25,29/5, 2,11/6/81; Encounter magazine, Vol.58–9 no.2; New Society, Vol.60; Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, Vol.4 no.4 and [https://books.google.com/books?id=_wUAAAAAMBAJ&dq=bernstein+gas+lewis+atomic+anthrax&pg=PA42 'Churchill's Anthrax Bombs – a debate'], Vol.4 no.12, November 1987.

In July 1944, fearing that rocket attacks on London would get even worse, and saying he would only use chemical weapons if it were "life or death for us" or would "shorten the war by a year",{{cite book |first1= Jeremy |last1= Paxman |author-link1= Jeremy Paxman |first2= Robert |last2= Harris |author-link2= Robert Harris (novelist) |chapter-url= http://libcom.org/library/churchills-plans-drench-germany-poison-gas-anthrax-robert-harris-jeremy-paxman |oclc= 268949025 |isbn= 978-0-8129-6653-4 |date= August 6, 2002 |title= A higher form of killing: the secret history of chemical and biological warfare |page= [https://archive.org/details/isbn_9780812966534/page/128 128] |quote= I want the matter studied in cold blood by sensible people |orig-year= 1982 |chapter= The War That Never Was |publisher= Random House Publishing |url= https://archive.org/details/isbn_9780812966534/page/128 }} Churchill wrote a secret memorandum asking his military chiefs to "think very seriously over this question of using poison gas." He stated "it is absurd to consider morality on this topic when everybody used it in the last war without a word of complaint..."

The Joint Planning Staff, however, advised against the use of gas because it would inevitably provoke Germany to retaliate with gas. They argued that this would be to the Allies' disadvantage in France both for military reasons and because it might "seriously impair our relations with the civilian population when it became generally known that chemical warfare was first employed by us."[http://libcom.org/library/churchills-plans-drench-germany-poison-gas-anthrax-robert-harris-jeremy-paxman "Paxman and Harris"], p132-35.

In 1945, the U.S. Army's Chemical Warfare Service standardized improved chemical warfare rockets intended for the new M9 and M9A1 "Bazooka" launchers, adopting the M26 Gas Rocket, a cyanogen chloride (CK)-filled warhead for the 2.36-in rocket launcher.{{Citation | last = Smart | first = Jeffrey | title = History of Chemical and Biological Warfare: An American Perspective | chapter = 2 | place = Aberdeen, MD, USA | publisher = Army Chemical and Biological Defense Command | year = 1997 | page = 32}}. CK, a deadly blood agent, was capable of penetrating the protective filter barriers in some gas masks,{{Cite web|url=https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/ershdb/EmergencyResponseCard_29750039.html|title = Cyanogen chloride (CK): Systemic Agent | NIOSH | CDC|date = 9 July 2021}} and was seen as an effective agent against Japanese forces (particularly those hiding in caves or bunkers), whose gas masks lacked the impregnants that would provide protection against the chemical reaction of CK.{{Citation | title = Field Manual 3–5 | contribution = Characteristics and Employment of Ground Chemical Munitions | place = Washington, DC | publisher = War Department | year = 1946 | pages = 108–19}}.{{Citation | last = Skates | first = John R | title = The Invasion of Japan: Alternative to the Bomb | publisher = University of South Carolina Press | year = 2000 | isbn = 978-1-57003-354-4 | pages = 93–96}} While stockpiled in US inventory, the CK rocket was never deployed or issued to combat personnel.

On the night of December 2, 1943, German Ju 88 bombers attacked the port of Bari in Southern Italy, sinking several American ships—among them the {{SS|John Harvey}}, which was carrying mustard gas intended for use in retaliation by the Allies if German forces initiated gas warfare. The presence of the gas was highly classified, and authorities ashore had no knowledge of it, which increased the number of fatalities since physicians, who had no idea that they were dealing with the effects of mustard gas, prescribed treatment improper for those suffering from exposure and immersion.

The whole affair was kept secret at the time and for many years after the war. According to the U.S. military account, "Sixty-nine deaths were attributed in whole or in part to the mustard gas, most of them American merchant seamen"{{citation|url=http://www.history.navy.mil/faqs/faq104-4.htm |title=Naval Armed Guard Service: Tragedy at Bari, Italy on 2 December 1943 |author=US Naval Historical Center |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080112101131/http://www.history.navy.mil/faqs/faq104-4.htm |archive-date=January 12, 2008 }} out of 628 mustard gas military casualties.{{citation|url=http://www.historynet.com/world-war-ii-german-raid-on-bari.htm|title=World War II: German Raid on Bari|first1 = Eric | last1 = Niderost|date=12 June 2006|publisher=HistoryNet.com}}

The large number of civilian casualties among the Italian population was not recorded. Part of the confusion and controversy derives from the fact that the German attack was highly destructive and lethal in itself, also apart from the accidental additional effects of the gas (the attack was nicknamed "The Little Pearl Harbor"), and attribution of the causes of death between the gas and other causes is far from easy.{{Citation|title=Disaster at Bari|author=Infield, Glenn B. Infield}}{{Citation|title=Nightmare in Bari: The World War II Liberty Ship Poison Gas Disaster and Coverup|author=Reminick, Gerald }}

Rick Atkinson, in his book The Day of Battle, describes the intelligence that prompted Allied leaders to deploy mustard gas to Italy. This included Italian intelligence that Adolf Hitler had threatened to use gas against Italy if the state changed sides, and prisoner of war interrogations suggesting that preparations were being made to use a "new, egregiously potent gas" if the war turned decisively against Germany. Atkinson concludes, "No commander in 1943 could be cavalier about a manifest threat by Germany to use gas."

After World War II, the Allies recovered German artillery shells containing the three German nerve agents of the day (tabun, sarin, and soman), prompting further research into nerve agents by all of the former Allies.

Although the threat of global thermonuclear war was foremost in the minds of most during the Cold War, both the Soviet and Western governments put enormous resources into developing chemical and biological weapons.

File:2inchMortarsPortonDown.jpg was first established in 1916 and became the centre for the development of chemical weapons.]]

In the late 1940s and early 1950s, British postwar chemical weapons research was based at the Porton Down facility. Research was aimed at providing Britain with the means to arm itself with a modern nerve-agent-based capability and to develop specific means of defense against these agents.

Ranajit Ghosh, a chemist at the Plant Protection Laboratories of Imperial Chemical Industries was investigating a class of organophosphate compounds (organophosphate esters of substituted aminoethanethiols),{{cite journal|last=Ghosh|first=R.|author2=Newman, J.E. |title=A new group of organophosphorus pesticides|journal=Chemistry and Industry|date=Jan 29, 1955|page=118}} for use as a pesticide. In 1954, ICI put one of them on the market under the trade name Amiton. It was subsequently withdrawn, as it was too toxic for safe use.

The toxicity did not go unnoticed, and samples of it were sent to the research facility at Porton Down for evaluation. After the evaluation was complete, several members of this class of compounds were developed into a new group of much more lethal nerve agents, the V agents. The best-known of these is probably VX, assigned the UK Rainbow Code Purple Possum, with the Russian V-Agent coming a close second (Amiton is largely forgotten as VG).{{cite book|title=Porton Down: a brief history|author=G B Carter}}

On the defensive side, there were years of difficult work to develop the means of prophylaxis, therapy, rapid detection and identification, decontamination and more effective protection of the body against nerve agents, capable of exerting effects through the skin, the eyes and respiratory tract.

Tests were carried out on servicemen to determine the effects of nerve agents on human subjects, with one recorded death due to a nerve gas experiment. There have been persistent allegations of unethical human experimentation at Porton Down, such as those relating to the death of Leading Aircraftman Ronald Maddison, aged 20, in 1953. Maddison was taking part in sarin nerve agent toxicity tests. Sarin was dripped onto his arm and he died shortly afterwards.{{cite book|title=Chemical and Biological Defence at Porton Down 1916–2000|author=G B Carter|publisher=The Stationery Office|year=2000}}

In the 1950s, the Chemical Defence Experimental Establishment became involved with the development of CS, a riot control agent, and took an increasing role in trauma and wound ballistics work. Both these facets of Porton Down's work had become more important because of the situation in Northern Ireland.{{cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=HMx_6FtHBcUC|title=Cold War, Hot Science: Applied Research in Britain's Defence Laboratories, 1945–1990|author1=Robert Bud |author2=Philip Gummett |year=2002|publisher=Science museum|isbn=9781900747479}}

In the early 1950s, nerve agents such as sarin were produced— about 20 tons were made from 1954 until 1956. CDE Nancekuke was an important factory for stockpiling chemical weapons. Small amounts of VX were produced there, mainly for laboratory test purposes, but also to validate plant designs and optimise chemical processes for potential mass production. However, full-scale mass production of VX agent never took place, with the 1956 decision to end the UK's offensive chemical weapons programme.{{cite web|url=http://www.mod.uk:80/DefenceInternet/AboutDefence/WhatWeDo/DefenceEstateandEnvironment/Nancekuke/ |archive-url=http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20101208174527/http://www.mod.uk:80/DefenceInternet/AboutDefence/WhatWeDo/DefenceEstateandEnvironment/Nancekuke/ |url-status=dead |archive-date=December 8, 2010 |title=Nancekuke Remediation Project |publisher=Ministry of Defence (Archived by The National Archives) |access-date=April 25, 2012 }} In the late 1950s, the chemical weapons production plant at Nancekuke was mothballed, but was maintained through the 1960s and 1970s in a state whereby production of chemical weapons could easily re-commence if required.

In 1952, the U.S. Army patented a process for the "Preparation of Toxic Ricin", publishing a method of producing this powerful toxin. In 1958 the British government traded their VX technology with the United States in exchange for information on thermonuclear weapons{{Citation needed|reason=No authoritative source supports this trade.|date=February 2023}}. By 1961 the U.S. was producing large amounts of VX and performing its own nerve agent research. This research produced at least three more agents; the four agents (VE, VG, VM, VX) are collectively known as the "V-Series" class of nerve agents.

Between 1951 and 1969, Dugway Proving Ground was the site of testing for various chemical and biological agents, including an open-air aerodynamic dissemination test in 1968 that accidentally killed, on neighboring farms, approximately 6,400 sheep by an unspecified nerve agent.{{citation|url=http://www.gulfweb.org/bigdoc/rockrep.cfm|id=103d Congress, 2d Session – Committee Print – S. Prt. 103–97|title=Is Military Research Hazardous to Veterans' Health? Lessons spanning half a century|author=Staff, Committee on Veterans' Affairs, US Senate|date=December 8, 1994|access-date=December 22, 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060813164326/http://gulfweb.org/bigdoc/rockrep.cfm|archive-date =August 13, 2006|url-status=dead|df=mdy-all}}

From 1962 to 1973, the Department of Defense planned 134 tests under Project 112, a chemical and biological weapons "vulnerability-testing program." In 2002, the Pentagon admitted for the first time that some of tests used real chemical and biological weapons, not just harmless simulants.{{citation|url=http://www.dailyemerald.com/2.2378/sickening-strategy-1.222877 |title=Sickening strategy |date=October 17, 2002 |author=Philip Huang |journal=Oregon Daily Emerald }}{{dead link|date=May 2016|bot=medic}}{{cbignore|bot=medic}}

Specifically under Project SHAD, 37 secret tests were conducted in California, Alaska, Florida, Hawaii, Maryland, and Utah. Land tests in Alaska and Hawaii used artillery shells filled with sarin and VX, while Navy trials off the coasts of Florida, California and Hawaii tested the ability of ships and crew to perform under biological and chemical warfare, without the crew's knowledge. The code name for the sea tests was Project Shipboard Hazard and Defense—"SHAD" for short.

In October 2002, the Senate Armed Forces Subcommittee on Personnel held hearings as the controversial news broke that chemical agents had been tested on thousands of American military personnel. The hearings were chaired by Senator Max Cleland, former VA administrator and Vietnam War veteran.

In December 2001, the United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), and National Personal Protective Technology Laboratory (NPPTL), along with the U.S. Army Research, Development and Engineering Command (RDECOM), Edgewood Chemical and Biological Center (ECBC), and the U.S. Department of Commerce National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) published the first of six technical performance standards and test procedures designed to evaluate and certify respirators intended for use by civilian emergency responders to a chemical, biological, radiological, or nuclear weapon release, detonation, or terrorism incident.

To date NIOSH/NPPTL has published six new respirator performance standards based on a tiered approach that relies on traditional industrial respirator certification policy, next-generation emergency response respirator performance requirements, and special live chemical warfare agent testing requirements of the classes of respirators identified to offer respiratory protection against chemical, biological, radiological, and nuclear (CBRN) agent inhalation hazards. These CBRN respirators are commonly known as open-circuit self-contained breathing apparatus (CBRN SCBA), air-purifying respirator (CBRN APR), air-purifying escape respirator (CBRN APER), self-contained escape respirator (CBRN SCER) and loose- or tight-fitting powered air-purifying respirators (CBRN PAPR).

Due to the secrecy of the Soviet Union's government, very little information was available about the direction and progress of the Soviet chemical weapons until relatively recently. After the fall of the Soviet Union, Russian chemist Vil Mirzayanov published articles revealing illegal chemical weapons experimentation in Russia.

In 1993, Mirzayanov was imprisoned and fired from his job at the State Research Institute of Organic Chemistry and Technology, where he had worked for 26 years. In March 1994, after a major campaign by U.S. scientists on his behalf, Mirzayanov was released.Yevgenia Albats and Catherine A. Fitzpatrick. The State Within a State: The KGB and Its Hold on Russia – Past, Present, and Future, 1994. {{ISBN|0-374-18104-7}} (see pages 325–328)

Among the information related by Vil Mirzayanov was the direction of Soviet research into the development of even more toxic nerve agents, which saw most of its success during the mid-1980s. Several highly toxic agents were developed during this period; the only unclassified information regarding these agents is that they are known in the open literature only as "Foliant" agents (named after the program under which they were developed) and by various code designations, such as A-230 and A-232.{{citation |url=https://fas.org/nuke/guide/russia/cbw/jptac008_l94001.htm|title=Chemical Weapons in Russia: History, Ecology, Politics|first=Lev|last=Fedorov|publisher=Center of Ecological Policy of Russia|date=July 27, 1994}}

According to Mirzayanov, the Soviets also developed weapons that were safer to handle, leading to the development of binary weapons, in which precursors for the nerve agents are mixed in a munition to produce the agent just prior to its use. Because the precursors are generally significantly less hazardous than the agents themselves, this technique makes handling and transporting the munitions a great deal simpler.

Additionally, precursors to the agents are usually much easier to stabilize than the agents themselves, so this technique also made it possible to increase the shelf life of the agents a great deal. During the 1980s and 1990s, binary versions of several Soviet agents were developed and designated "Novichok" agents (after the Russian word for "newcomer").{{citation|first=Vadim J.|last=Birstein|title=The Perversion Of Knowledge: The True Story of Soviet Science|publisher=Westview Press|year=2004|isbn=978-0-8133-4280-1}} Together with Lev Fedorov, he told the secret Novichok story exposed in the newspaper The Moscow News.{{citation|first1=Lev|last1=Federov|first2=Vil |last2=Mirzayanov|title=A Poisoned Policy|journal=Moscow News|issue=weekly No. 39|year=1992}}

File:Red Cross at Uqd.jpg hospital at Uqd, North Yemen, where the use of chemical weapons was alleged to have occurred]]

The first attack of the North Yemen Civil War took place on June 8, 1963, against Kawma, a village of about 100 inhabitants in northern Yemen, killing about seven people and damaging the eyes and lungs of 25 others. This incident is considered to have been experimental, and the bombs were described as "home-made, amateurish and relatively ineffective". The Egyptian authorities suggested that the reported incidents were probably caused by napalm, not gas.

There were no reports of gas during 1964, and only a few were reported in 1965. The reports grew more frequent in late 1966. On December 11, 1966, fifteen gas bombs killed two people and injured thirty-five. On January 5, 1967, the biggest gas attack came against the village of Kitaf, causing 270 casualties, including 140 fatalities. The target may have been Prince Hassan bin Yahya, who had installed his headquarters nearby. The Egyptian government denied using poison gas, and alleged that Britain and the US were using the reports as psychological warfare against Egypt. On February 12, 1967, it said it would welcome a UN investigation. On March 1, U Thant, the then Secretary-General of the United Nations, said he was "powerless" to deal with the matter.

On May 10, 1967, the twin villages of Gahar and Gadafa in Wadi Hirran, where Prince Mohamed bin Mohsin was in command, were gas bombed, killing at least seventy-five. The Red Cross was alerted and on June 2, 1967, it issued a statement in Geneva expressing concern. The Institute of Forensic Medicine at the University of Berne made a statement, based on a Red Cross report, that the gas was likely to have been halogenous derivatives—phosgene, mustard gas, lewisite, chloride or cyanogen bromide.

{{See also|Rhodesia and weapons of mass destruction}}

Evidence points to a top-secret Rhodesian program in the 1970s to use organophosphate pesticides and heavy metal rodenticides to contaminate clothing as well as food and beverages. The contaminated items were covertly introduced into insurgent supply chains. Hundreds of insurgent deaths were reported, although the actual death toll likely rose over 1,000.{{Citation |author=Cross, Glenn|title=Dirty War: Rhodesia and Chemical Biological Warfare, 1975–1980|publisher=Helion & Company|year=2017|isbn=978-1-911512-12-7}}

During the Cuban intervention in Angola, United Nations toxicologists certified that residue from both VX and sarin nerve agents had been discovered in plants, water, and soil where Cuban units were conducting operations against National Union for the Total Independence of Angola (UNITA) insurgents.{{cite book|last1=Hawk|first1=Kathleen Dupes|last2=Villella|first2=Ron|last3=Varona|first3=Adolfo Leyva de|title=Florida and the Mariel Boatlift of 1980: The First Twenty Days|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=DWbvAwAAQBAJ&pg=PA67|access-date=October 11, 2014|date=July 30, 2014|publisher=University of Alabama Press|isbn=978-0817318376}} In 1985, UNITA made the first of several claims that their forces were the target of chemical weapons, specifically organophosphates. The following year guerrillas reported being bombarded with an unidentified greenish-yellow agent on three separate occasions. Depending on the length and intensity of exposure, victims suffered blindness or death. The toxin was also observed to have killed plant life.{{cite news|title=Chemical weapons being used in Angola?

|url=https://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=1697&dat=19860822&id=kzQqAAAAIBAJ&pg=5194,5088760&hl=en|work=Park City Daily News|location=Bowling Green, Kentucky|date=August 22, 1986|access-date=July 28, 2015}} Shortly afterwards, UNITA also sighted strikes carried out with a brown agent which it claimed resembled mustard gas.Helen E. Purkitt, Stephen F. Burgess: The Rollback of South Africa's Chemical and Biological Warfare Program, Air University, Counterproliferation Center, Maxwell Airforce Base, Alabama, 2001 As early as 1984 a research team dispatched by the University of Ghent had examined patients in UNITA field hospitals showing signs of exposure to nerve agents, although it found no evidence of mustard gas.{{cite news|title=Cubans using poison gas in Angola|url=https://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=1899&dat=19880826&id=qmMgAAAAIBAJ&pg=2776,3400252&hl=en|work=The Lewiston Journal|location=Lewiston–Auburn, Maine|date=August 26, 1988|access-date=July 28, 2015}}

The UN first accused Cuba of deploying chemical weapons against Angolan civilians and partisans in 1988. Wouter Basson later disclosed that South African military intelligence had long verified the use of unidentified chemical weapons on Angolan soil; this was to provide the impetus for their own biological warfare programme, Project Coast. During the Battle of Cuito Cuanavale, South African troops then fighting in Angola were issued with gas masks and ordered to rehearse chemical weapons drills. Although the status of its own chemical weapons program remained uncertain, South Africa also deceptively bombarded Cuban and Angolan units with colored smoke in an attempt to induce hysteria or mass panic. According to Defence Minister Magnus Malan, this would force the Cubans to share the inconvenience of having to take preventative measures such as donning NBC suits, which would cut combat effectiveness in half. The tactic was effective: beginning in early 1988 Cuban units posted to Angola were issued with full protective gear in anticipation of a South African chemical strike.

On October 29, 1988, personnel attached to Angola's 59 Brigade, accompanied by six Soviet military advisors, reported being struck with chemical weapons on the banks of the Mianei River.{{cite book |editor1=Tokarev, Andrei |editor2=Shubin, Gennady |title=Bush War: The Road to Cuito Cuanavale: Soviet Soldiers' Accounts of the Angolan War |year=2011 |pages=128–130 |publisher=Jacana Media (Pty) Ltd |location=Auckland Park |isbn=978-1-4314-0185-7}} The attack occurred shortly after one in the afternoon. Four Angolan soldiers lost consciousness while the others complained of violent headaches and nausea. That November the Angolan representative to the UN accused South Africa of employing poison gas near Cuito Cuanavale for the first time.

Technically, the reported employment of tear gas by Argentine forces during the 1982 invasion of the Falkland Islands constitutes chemical warfare.The Argentine Fight for The Falklands, Lieutenant-Commander Sanchez-Sabarots However, the tear gas grenades were employed as nonlethal weapons to avoid British casualties. The barrack buildings the weapons were used on proved to be deserted in any case. The British claim that more lethal, but legally justifiable as they are not considered chemical weapons under the Chemical Weapons Convention, white phosphorus grenades were used.Falkland Islanders at war, Bound, Graham, Pen and Sword Books Limited, {{ISBN|1-84415-429-7}}.

There were reports of chemical weapons being used by Soviet forces during the Soviet–Afghan War, sometimes against civilians.[http://publishing.cdlib.org/ucpressebooks/view?docId=ft7b69p12h&chunk.id=ch013&toc.depth=1&toc.id=ch013&brand=eschol The Story of Genocide in Afghanistan] Hassan Kakar[http://www.paulbogdanor.com/left/afghan/report.pdf Report from Afghanistan] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170128201614/http://www.paulbogdanor.com/left/afghan/report.pdf |date=2017-01-28 }} Claude Malhuret

There is some evidence suggesting that Vietnamese troops used phosgene gas against Cambodian resistance forces in Thailand during the 1984–1985 dry-season offensive on the Thai-Cambodian border."KPNLF says Vietnamese Using Suffocant Gas," Bangkok World, January 4, 1985, p. 1."Viets Accused of Using Gas Against Rebels," Associated Press, February 19, 1985."Thais Report a Clash with Vietnamese Troops," Associated Press, February 20, 1985.

{{See also|Iraqi chemical weapons program}}

File:Sardashtchemic.jpg, Iran]]

Chemical weapons employed by Saddam Hussein killed and injured numerous Iranians and Iraqi Kurds. According to Iraqi documents, assistance in developing chemical weapons was obtained from firms in many countries, including the United States, West Germany, the Netherlands, the United Kingdom, and France.{{Citation |author=Lafayette, Lev |title=Who armed Saddam? |journal=World History Archives |date=July 26, 2002 |url=http://www.hartford-hwp.com/archives/51/040.html}}

About 100,000 Iranian soldiers were victims of Iraq's chemical attacks. Many were hit by mustard gas. The official estimate does not include the civilian population contaminated in bordering towns or the children and relatives of veterans, many of whom have developed blood, lung and skin complications, according to the Organization for Veterans. Nerve gas agents killed about 20,000 Iranian soldiers immediately, according to official reports. Of the 80,000 survivors, some 5,000 seek medical treatment regularly and about 1,000 are still hospitalized with severe, chronic conditions.{{citation|url=http://www.nj.com/specialprojects/index.ssf?/specialprojects/mideaststories/me1209.html|title=In Iran, grim reminders of Saddam's arsenal|date=October 27, 2002|first=Farnaz|last=Fassihi|journal=New Jersey Star Ledger|access-date=September 2, 2019|archive-date=December 13, 2007|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20071213061050/http://www.nj.com/specialprojects/index.ssf?%2Fspecialprojects%2Fmideaststories%2Fme1209.html|url-status=dead}}{{citation|url=http://www.thestar.co.za/index.php?fArticleId=39470|title=It's like a knife stabbing into me|author=Paul Hughes|work=The Star (South Africa)|date=January 21, 2003}}{{citation|url=http://www.commondreams.org/headlines03/0213-05.htm |date=February 13, 2003 |journal=The New York Times |title=Iraq Chemical Arms Condemned, but West Once Looked the Other Way |first=Elaine |last=Sciolino |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130527105217/http://www.commondreams.org/headlines03/0213-05.htm |archive-date=May 27, 2013 }}

According to the Foreign Policy, the "Iraqis used mustard gas and sarin prior to four major offensives in early 1988 that relied on U.S. satellite imagery, maps, and other intelligence. ... According to recently declassified CIA documents and interviews with former intelligence officials like Francona, the U.S. had firm evidence of Iraqi chemical attacks beginning in 1983."{{cite news |title=Exclusive: CIA Files Prove America Helped Saddam as He Gassed Iran |url=https://foreignpolicy.com/2013/08/26/exclusive-cia-files-prove-america-helped-saddam-as-he-gassed-iran/ |work=Foreign Policy |date=August 26, 2013}}{{cite news |title=Chemical attacks on Iran: When the US looked the other way |url=https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2018/04/chemical-attacks-iran-180415122524733.html |publisher=Al-Jazeera |date=19 April 2018}}

{{Main|Halabja chemical attack}}

In March 1988, the Iraqi Kurdish town of Halabja was exposed to multiple chemical agents dropped from warplanes; these "may have included mustard gas, the nerve agents sarin, tabun and VX and possibly cyanide."[http://news.bbc.co.uk/onthisday/hi/dates/stories/march/16/newsid_4304000/4304853.stm On this day: 1988: Thousands die in Halabja gas attack], BBC News (March 16, 1988). Between 3,200 and 5,000 people were killed, and between 7,000 and 10,000 were injured. Some reports indicated that three-quarters of them were women and children. The preponderance of the evidence indicates that Iraq was responsible for the attack.

The U.S. Department of Defense and Central Intelligence Agency's longstanding official position is that Iraqi forces under Saddam Hussein did not use chemical weapons during the Persian Gulf War in 1991. In a memorandum in 1994 to veterans of the war, Defense Secretary William J. Perry and General John M. Shalikashvili, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, wrote that "There is no evidence, classified or unclassified, that indicates that chemical or biological weapons were used in the Persian Gulf."Jonathan B. Tucker, [https://www.nonproliferation.org/wp-content/uploads/npr/tucker43.pdf Evidence Iraq Used Chemical Weapons During the 1991 Persian Gulf War], The Nonproliferation Review (Spring-Summer 1997), pp. 114–22.

However, chemical weapons expert Jonathan B. Tucker, writing in the Nonproliferation Review in 1997, determined that although "[t]he absence of severe chemical injuries or fatalities among Coalition forces makes it clear that no large-scale Iraqi employment of chemical weapons occurred," an array of "circumstantial evidence from a variety of sources suggests that Iraq deployed chemical weapons into the Kuwait Theater of Operations (KTO)—the area including Kuwait and Iraq south of the 31st Parallel, where the ground war was fought—and engaged in sporadic chemical warfare against Coalition forces." In addition to intercepts of Iraqi military communications and publicly available reporting:

{{blockquote|Other sources of evidence for sporadic Iraqi chemical warfare include U.S. intelligence reports on the presence of Iraqi chemical weapons in the KTO; military log entries describing the discovery by U.S. units of chemical munitions in Iraqi bunkers during and after the ground war; incidents in which troops reported acute symptoms of toxic chemical exposure; and credible detections of chemical-warfare agents by Czech, French, and American forces.}}

Nerve agents (specifically, tabun, sarin, and cyclosarin) and blister agents (specifically, sulfur-mustard and lewisite) were detected at Iraqi sites.

The threat itself of gas warfare had a major effect on Israel, which was not part of the coalition forces led by the US. Israel was attacked with 39 scud missiles, most of which were knocked down in the air above their targets by Patriot missiles developed by Raytheon together with Israel, and supplied by the US. Sirens warned of the attacks approximately 10 minutes before their expected arrival, and Israelis donned gas masks and entered sealed "safe" rooms, over a period 5 weeks. Babies were issued special gas-safe cribs, and religious men were issued gas masks that allowed them to preserve their beards.[https://faculty.biu.ac.il/~steing/arms/chem.htm Israeli Responses to the Threat of Chemical Warfare], Prof. Gerald Steinberg, Published in Armed Forces and Society, Vol. 20., No. 1 Fall 1993, pp.85–101 (Faculty of Chemistry, Bar Ilan University website)[http://mfa.gov.il/MFA/AboutIsrael/History/Pages/The%20Gulf%20War%20-%201991.aspx The Gulf War], Netanel Lorch (published on the Israel ministry of foreign affairs website)[https://books.google.com/books?id=y4HlrGJbFYYC&pg=PA139 The distribution of special gas masks for bearded men] in footnote 19 about Prof. Yosseph Shilhav's research. Sticking Together page 139, Yakov Kop and Robert E. Litan (Google Books)

In 2014, tapes from Saddam Hussain's archives revealed that Saddam had given orders to use gas against Israel as a last resort if his military communications with the army were cut off.[https://www.timesofisrael.com/saddam-gave-orders-to-fire-chemical-weapons-at-tel-aviv-if-he-was-toppled-in-first-gulf-war/ Saddam gave orders to fire chemical weapons at Tel-Aviv if he was toppled in first gulf war] January 25, 2014 (Times of Israel website)

In 2015, The New York Times published an article about the declassified report of operation Avarice in 2005 in which over 400 chemical weapons including many rockets and missiles from the Iran-Iraq war period were recovered and subsequently destroyed by the CIA.{{cite web|last1=Chivers|first1=C.J.|last2=Schmitt|first2=Eric|title=CIA is said to have bought and destroyed Iraqi chemical weapons|work=The New York Times|date =February 15, 2015|url=http://mobile.nytimes.com/2015/02/16/world/cia-is-said-to-have-bought-and-destroyed-iraqi-chemical-weapons.html?referer&_r=1|access-date=May 21, 2016}} Many other stockpiles, estimated by UNSCOM up to 600 metric tons of chemical weapons, were known to have existed and even admitted by Saddam's regime, but claimed by them to have been destroyed. These have never been found but are believed to still exist.[http://edition.cnn.com/2003/US/01/27/sprj.irq.blix.report/index.html The chief U.N. weapons inspector said on Monday that Iraq could not account for stocks of anthrax and a deadly nerve gas that it said it had destroyed] January 27, 2003, Cnn[https://books.google.com/books?id=7F-nbw6q8S4C&pg=PA343 Deadly arsenals] Joseph Cirincione et al. Page 343 quoting UNSCOM reports. (Google Books)

During Operation Iraqi Freedom, American service members who demolished or handled older explosive ordnance may have been exposed to blister agents (mustard agent) or nerve agents (sarin).{{cite web|publisher= U.S. Army Public Health Command|title= Chemical Warfare Agents|url= https://ph.health.mil/topics/envirohealth/em/Pages/CWA.aspx|access-date= July 10, 2015|archive-date= November 16, 2015|archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20151116230331/http://phc.amedd.army.mil/topics/envirohealth/em/Pages/CWA.aspx|url-status= live}} According to The New York Times, "In all, American troops secretly reported finding roughly 5,000 chemical warheads, shells or aviation bombs, according to interviews with dozens of participants, Iraqi and American officials, and heavily redacted intelligence documents obtained under the Freedom of Information Act."{{cite web |url=https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2014/10/14/world/middleeast/us-casualties-of-iraq-chemical-weapons.html |title=The Secret Casualties of Iraq's Abandoned Chemical Weapons |author=C. J. Chivers |date=October 14, 2014 |website=The New York Times |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20141015025712/http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2014/10/14/world/middleeast/us-casualties-of-iraq-chemical-weapons.html |archive-date=October 15, 2014}} Among these, over 2,400 nerve-agent rockets were found in summer 2006 at Camp Taji, a former Iraqi Republican Guard compound. "These weapons were not part of an active arsenal"; "they were remnants from an Iraqi program in the 1980s during the Iran-Iraq war".

File:Ghouta massacre4.JPG

{{Main|Syria and weapons of mass destruction|Use of chemical weapons in the Syrian Civil War}}

{{See also|Syria chemical weapons program|Destruction of Syria's chemical weapons}}

Sarin, mustard gas, and chlorine have been used during the conflict. Numerous casualties led to an international reaction, especially the 2013 Ghouta attacks. A UN fact-finding mission was requested to investigate alleged chemical weapons attacks. In four cases the UN inspectors confirmed use of sarin gas.{{cite web|title = CDC {{!}} Facts About Sarin|url = http://www.bt.cdc.gov/agent/sarin/basics/facts.asp|website = www.bt.cdc.gov|access-date = October 7, 2015|archive-date = April 14, 2003|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20030414181911/http://www.bt.cdc.gov/agent/sarin/basics/facts.asp|url-status = dead}} In August 2016, a confidential report by the United Nations and the OPCW explicitly blamed the Syrian military of Bashar al-Assad for dropping chemical weapons (chlorine bombs) on the towns of Talmenes in April 2014 and Sarmin in March 2015 and ISIS for using sulfur mustard on the town of Marea in August 2015.[https://www.nytimes.com/2016/08/25/world/middleeast/syria-used-chlorine-in-bombs-against-civilians-report-says.html Syria Used Chlorine in Bombs Against Civilians, Report Says], The New York Times, Rick Gladstone, August 24, 2016 retrieved August 25, 2016. In 2016, Jaysh al-Islam rebel group had used chlorine gas or other agents against Kurdish militia and civilians in the Sheikh Maqsood neighborhood of Aleppo.{{cite web|title=Kurdish Officials: Rebels May Have Used Chemicals in Aleppo|url=https://www.voanews.com/a/kurdish-officials-rebels-may-have-used-chemicals-aleppo/3276743.html|website=Voice of America|date=April 8, 2016|access-date=April 11, 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160411110119/http://www.voanews.com/content/kurdish-officials-rebels-may-have-used-chemicals-aleppo/3276743.html|archive-date=April 11, 2016|url-status=live}}

Many countries, including the United States and the European Union have accused the Syrian government of conducting several chemical attacks. Following the 2013 Ghouta attacks and international pressure, Syria acceded to the Chemical Weapons Convention and the destruction of Syria's chemical weapons began. In 2015 the UN mission disclosed previously undeclared traces of sarin compounds{{Disputed inline|talk=Talk:Use_of_chemical_weapons_in_the_Syrian_civil_war#Undeclared_.22traces_of_sarin.22|date=May 2015}} in a "military research site".{{cite news | url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/middleeast/syria/11594763/UN-inspectors-find-undeclared-sarin-linked-chemicals-at-Syrian-military-site.html | title=UN inspectors find undeclared sarin-linked chemicals at Syrian military site | newspaper=The Telegraph | date=May 9, 2015 | access-date=May 9, 2015 | author=Louisa Loveluck | location=London}} After the April 2017 Khan Shaykhun chemical attack, the United States launched its first attack against Syrian government forces. On 14 April 2018, the United States, France and the United Kingdom carried out a series of joint military strikes against multiple government sites in Syria, including the Barzah scientific research centre, after a chemical attack in Douma.

Russians have used tear gas against Ukrainian forces.{{Cite web |date=2023-12-27 |title=Military: 465 documented cases of Russia using chemical weapons in Ukraine since Feb. 24, 2022 |url=https://kyivindependent.com/military-465-documented-cases-of-russia-using-chemical-weapons-in-ukraine-since-feb-24-2022/ |access-date=2024-01-02 |website=The Kyiv Independent |language=en}} It has been done by having a drone drop a grenade with K-51 aerosol CS gas in it. {{Cite web |title=Have Chemical Weapons been Used in Ukraine? |url=https://rusi.orghttps//rusi.org |access-date=2024-01-02 |website=rusi.orghttps |language=en }}{{Dead link|date=August 2024 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }} As of March 2024, Ukrainian forces reported an increase of Russian drones dropping “grenades with suffocating and tear gas”. 371 Cases of gas usage was reported over the past month, an increase of 90 incidents was recorded compared to February. Compared to Ukrainian soldiers are receiving training to deal with such attacks but lack modern gas masks. Old Soviet issued masks are “ineffective” and soldiers are having to crowd fund newer masks. Tear Gas or Captir Spray is banned under the Chemical Weapons Convention {{cite news |url= https://kyivindependent.com/military-russian-troops-begin-to-use-munition-with-prohibited-chemicals-more-frequent/ |title= Military: Russian use of prohibited chemical weapons has become 'systemic' |publisher=The Kyiv Independent |author= Kateryna Hodunova |date=5 April 2024}}{{cite news |url= https://www.telegraph.co.uk/world-news/2024/04/06/russia-using-illegal-chemical-attacks-against-ukraine/ |title= Russia inflicting illegal chemical attacks against Ukrainian soldiers |publisher=The Telegraph|author= James Rushton |date=6 April 2024}}

{{See also|Chemical terrorism}}

For many terrorist organizations, chemical weapons might be considered an ideal choice for a mode of attack, if they are available: they are cheap, relatively accessible, and easy to transport. A skilled chemist can readily synthesize most chemical agents if the precursors are available.

In July 1974, a group calling themselves the Aliens of America successfully firebombed the houses of a judge, two police commissioners, and one of the commissioner's cars, burned down two apartment buildings, and bombed the Pan Am Terminal at Los Angeles International Airport, killing three people and injuring eight. The organization, which turned out to be a single resident alien named Muharem Kurbegovic, claimed to have developed and possessed a supply of sarin, as well as four unique nerve agents named AA1, AA2, AA3, and AA4S. Although no agents were found at the time Kurbegovic was arrested in August 1974, he had reportedly acquired "all but one" of the ingredients required to produce a nerve agent. A search of his apartment turned up a variety of materials, including precursors for phosgene and a drum containing 25 pounds of sodium cyanide.{{citation|url=https://www.nbcnews.com/id/wbna3070093|title=T Is for Terror: A mad bomber who stalked Los Angeles in the '70s could be the poster boy for the kind of terrorist the FBI fears today|journal=Newsweek Web Exclusive|date=July 9, 2003}}

File:U.S. Navy Seabees assigned to Naval Mobile Construction Battalion 1 don their MCU-2P gas masks at the Naval Construction Battalion Center in Gulfport, Miss., Oct 081024-N-LD343-001.jpgs don their M40 Field Protective Mask]]

The first successful use of chemical agents by terrorists against a general civilian population was on June 27, 1994, when Aum Shinrikyo, an apocalyptic group based in Japan that believed it necessary to destroy the planet, released sarin gas in Matsumoto, Japan, killing eight and harming 200. The following year, Aum Shinrikyo released sarin into the Tokyo subway system killing 12 and injuring over 5,000.

On December 29, 1999, four days after Russian forces began an assault of Grozny, Chechen terrorists exploded two chlorine tanks in the town. Because of the wind conditions, no Russian soldiers were injured.Ксения Мяло. Россия и последние войны XX века: к истории падения сверхдержавы. Глава 5: [http://militera.lib.ru/research/myalo_kg/05.html Чеченский узел]. М.: Вече, 2002

Following the September 11 attacks on the U.S. cities of New York City and Washington, D.C., the organization Al-Qaeda responsible for the attacks announced that they were attempting to acquire radiological, biological, and chemical weapons. This threat was lent a great deal of credibility when a large archive of videotapes was obtained by the cable television network CNN in August 2002 showing, among other things, the killing of three dogs by an apparent nerve agent.{{citation|author=Nic Robertson |date=August 19, 2002 |url=http://archives.cnn.com/2002/US/08/19/terror.tape.chemical/ |title=Disturbing scenes of death show capability with chemical gas |work=CNN |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130407174830/http://archives.cnn.com/2002/US/08/19/terror.tape.chemical/ |archive-date=April 7, 2013 }}

In an anti-terrorist attack on October 26, 2002, Russian special forces used a chemical agent (presumably KOLOKOL-1, an aerosolized fentanyl derivative), as a precursor to an assault on Chechen terrorists, which ended the Moscow theater hostage crisis. All 42 of the terrorists and 120 out of 850 hostages were killed during the raid. Although the use of the chemical agent was justified as a means of selectively targeting terrorists, it killed over 100 hostages.

In early 2007, multiple terrorist bombings had been reported in Iraq using chlorine gas. These attacks wounded or sickened more than 350 people. Reportedly the bombers were affiliated with Al-Qaeda in Iraq,{{citation|url=http://www.mnf-iraq.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=11530&Itemid=128 |title=Chlorine Tanks Destroyed, Terrorists Killed in Raids |date=April 20, 2007 |author=Multi-National Force Iraq, Combined Press Information Center |id=Press Release A070420a |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090807182521/http://www.mnf-iraq.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=11530&Itemid=128 |archive-date=August 7, 2009 }} and they have used bombs of various sizes up to chlorine tanker trucks.{{citation|url=http://www.mnf-iraq.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=11185&Itemid=128 |id=Press Release 20070406-34 |date=April 6, 2007 |author=Multi-National Force Iraq, Combined Press Information Center |title=Suicide Vehicle Detonates outside Police Checkpoint |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090912161746/http://www.mnf-iraq.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=11185&Itemid=128 |archive-date=September 12, 2009 }} United Nations Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon condemned the attacks as "clearly intended to cause panic and instability in the country."{{citation|url=https://www.un.org/radio/6542.asp|first=Ki-Moon|last=Ban|journal=United Nations Radio|title=Secretary-General Condemns Chlorine Attack in Iraq|date=March 19, 2007}}

{{See also|Destruction of chemical weapons|Chemical Weapons Convention}}

The Protocol for the Prohibition of the Use in War of Asphyxiating, Poisonous or other Gases, and the Bacteriological Methods of Warfare, or the Geneva Protocol, is an international treaty which prohibits the use of chemical and biological weapons between signatory nations in international armed conflicts. Signed into international law at Geneva on June 17, 1925, and entered into force on February 8, 1928, this treaty states that chemical and biological weapons are "justly condemned by the general opinion of the civilised world."{{cite web |url=http://www.brad.ac.uk/acad/sbtwc/keytext/genprot.htm |title=Text of the Biological and Toxin Weapons Convention |publisher=Brad.ac.uk |access-date=September 5, 2013 |archive-date=September 7, 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130907031103/http://www.brad.ac.uk/acad/sbtwc/keytext/genprot.htm |url-status=dead }}

{{Main|Chemical Weapons Convention}}

File:Chemical Weapons Convention 2007.svg in 2015. Light colored territories are those states parties that have declared stockpiles of chemical weapons and/or have known production facilities for chemical weapons.]]

The most recent arms control agreement in international law, the Convention of the Prohibition of the Development, Production, Stockpiling and Use of Chemical Weapons and on their Destruction, or the Chemical Weapons Convention, outlaws the production, stockpiling, and use of chemical weapons. It is administered by the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW), an intergovernmental organisation based in The Hague.{{cite web |url=http://treaties.un.org/Pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=XXVI-3&chapter=26&lang=en |title=UNTC |publisher=Treaties.un.org |access-date=September 16, 2011 |archive-date=April 7, 2015 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150407202014/https://treaties.un.org/Pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=XXVI-3&chapter=26&lang=en |url-status=dead }}

{{reflist}}

• CBWInfo.com (2001). [https://web.archive.org/web/20041205051646/http://www.cbwinfo.com/History/History.html A Brief History of Chemical and Biological Weapons: Ancient Times to the 19th Century]. Retrieved November 24, 2004.
• Chomsky, Noam (March 4, 2001). [https://web.archive.org/web/20050103232821/http://www.countercurrents.org/chomsky1.htm Prospects for Peace in the Middle East], page 2. Lecture.
• Cordette, Jessica, MPH(c) (2003). [https://web.archive.org/web/20050416035052/http://www.want2race.net/hper/Chemical_Weapons_of_Mass_Destruction.ppt Chemical Weapons of Mass Destruction]. Retrieved November 29, 2004.
• {{Citation |author=Croddy, Eric |title=Chemical and Biological Warfare |publisher=Copernicus |year=2001 |isbn=978-0-387-95076-1 |url=https://archive.org/details/chemicalbiologic00crod }}
• Smart, Jeffery K., M.A. (1997). [https://web.archive.org/web/20041015013158/http://usuhs.mil/cbw/history.htm History of Biological and Chemical Warfare]. Retrieved November 24, 2004.
• United States Senate, 103d Congress, 2d Session. (May 25, 1994). [https://web.archive.org/web/20120706121855/http://www.gulfweb.org/bigdoc/report/riegle1.html The Riegle Report]. Retrieved November 6, 2004.
• Gerard J Fitzgerald. American Journal of Public Health. Washington: Apr 2008. Vol. 98, Iss. 4; p. 611
• {{cite book|title=Годы Войны|year=1976|author=Гречко, А.А.|publisher=Военное Издательство Министерства Оборонны СССР.Москва}}

• Leo P. Brophy and George J. B. Fisher; The Chemical Warfare Service: Organizing for War Office of the Chief of Military History, 1959; L. P. Brophy, W. D. Miles and C. C. Cochrane, The Chemical Warfare Service: From Laboratory to Field (1959); and B. E. Kleber and D. Birdsell, The Chemical Warfare Service in Combat (1966). official US history;
• Glenn Cross, Dirty War: Rhodesia and Chemical Biological Warfare, 1975–1980, Helion & Company, 2017
• Gordon M. Burck and Charles C. Flowerree; International Handbook on Chemical Weapons Proliferation 1991
• L. F. Haber. The Poisonous Cloud: Chemical Warfare in the First World War Oxford University Press: 1986
• James W. Hammond Jr; Poison Gas: The Myths Versus Reality Greenwood Press, 1999
• Jiri Janata, [http://arjournals.annualreviews.org/doi/abs/10.1146/annurev-anchem-060908-155242 Role of Analytical Chemistry in Defense Strategies Against Chemical and Biological Attack], Annual Review of Analytical Chemistry, 2009
• Ishmael Jones, The Human Factor: Inside the CIA's Dysfunctional Intelligence Culture, Encounter Books, New York 2008, revised 2010, {{ISBN|978-1-59403-382-7}}. WMD espionage.
• Benoit Morel and Kyle Olson; Shadows and Substance: The Chemical Weapons Convention Westview Press, 1993
• Geoff Plunkett, [http://www.bookdepository.co.uk/Chemical-Warfare-Australia-Geoff-Plunkett/9780987427908 Chemical Warfare in Australia: Australia's Involvement In Chemical Warfare 1914 – Today, (2nd Edition), 2013.]. Leech Cup Books. A volume in the Army Military History Series published in association with the Army History Unit.
• Jonathan B. Tucker. Chemical Warfare from World War I to Al-Qaeda (2006)

{{Chemical warfare}}

Category:Chemical warfare